↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL453+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  25   ~;  21   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   3 sgn  17   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(implies_1,axiom,
    ( implies_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_1) ).

fof(implies_2,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(X,Y)),implies(X,Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_2) ).

fof(or_3,axiom,
    ( or_3
  <=> ! [X,Y,Z] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Z),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(or(X,Y),Z)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',or_3) ).

fof(cn3,axiom,
    ( cn3
  <=> ! [P] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(P),P),P)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn3) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X,Y] : or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_or) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_implies_and) ).

fof(luka_cn3,conjecture,
    cn3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',luka_cn3) ).

fof(luka_cn3_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn3,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[luka_cn3]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A)))
    | ~ implies_1 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_1]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_2]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,B),implies(or(A,C),B))))
    | ~ or_3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[or_3]) ).

fof(nnf_21,plain,
    ( ( ? [P] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(P),P),P))
      | cn3 )
    & ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),X0),X0))
      | ~ cn3 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn3]) ).

fof(sk_cn3_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0))
      | cn3 )
    & ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),X0),X0))
      | ~ cn3 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(P,sK0)],[nnf_21]) ).

fof(sk_cn3,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0))
      | cn3 )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(VAR_0),VAR_0),VAR_0))
        | ~ cn3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_cn3_sk]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0))
    | cn3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_cn3]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    ( or(A,B) = not(and(not(A),not(B)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_or]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B)
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    ( not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and]) ).

fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

cnf(c_95,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_1,axiom,
    implies_1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_1) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    implies_1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_2,axiom,
    implies_2,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_2) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_2]) ).

fof(hilbert_or_3,axiom,
    or_3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_or_3) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    or_3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_3]) ).

cnf(c_114,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[luka_cn3_neg]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_92]) ).

cnf(c_118,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_120,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_121,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_128,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,B),implies(or(A,C),B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_133,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_320,plain,
    implies(not(A),B) = or(A,B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_115]) ).

cnf(c_134,plain,
    or(A,B) = implies(not(A),B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_320]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,B),implies(implies(not(A),C),B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_134,c_128]) ).

cnf(c_321,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(C)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,A)),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_120]) ).

cnf(c_159,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_321,c_121]) ).

cnf(c_322,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,A),B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_159]) ).

cnf(c_312,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(B),A),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_138]) ).

cnf(c_323,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,A),B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_159]) ).

cnf(c_318,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,A),implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_133]) ).

cnf(c_319,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_318,c_312]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL453+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.37  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:35:33 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.06/0.37  % Process 1289684 was started by sandbox on n014,
% 0.06/0.37  % Fri Sep 25 22:35:33 2026
% 0.06/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.06/0.38  
% 0.06/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.10/0.46  
% 0.10/0.46  % Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (94).
% 0.10/0.46  
% 0.10/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.46  
% 0.10/0.46  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.10/0.46  % Length of proof is 36.
% 0.10/0.46  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.10/0.46  % Maximum clause weight is 70.000.
% 0.10/0.46  % Given clauses 63.
% 0.10/0.46  
% 0.10/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------