↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL453+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:07:34 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   9 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(4,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    implies_1,
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    implies_2,
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    or_3,
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    ~ cn3,
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(28,axiom,
    ( ~ implies_1
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(v,u))) ),
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(skc98),skc98),skc98))
    | cn3 ),
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(60,axiom,
    ( ~ op_implies_and
    | equal(not__dfg(and__dfg(u,not__dfg(v))),implies__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(61,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(v) ),
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(64,axiom,
    ( ~ implies_2
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(u,v)),implies__dfg(u,v))) ),
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(66,axiom,
    ( ~ op_or
    | equal(not__dfg(and__dfg(not__dfg(u),not__dfg(v))),or__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(79,axiom,
    ( ~ or_3
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(w,v),implies__dfg(or__dfg(u,w),v)))) ),
    file('LCL453+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(89,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(v,u))),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[28,9]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:28.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(90,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(skc98),skc98),skc98)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[49,22]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:49.1,22.0')] ).

cnf(95,plain,
    equal(not__dfg(and__dfg(u,not__dfg(v))),implies__dfg(u,v)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[60,5]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:60.0,5.0')] ).

cnf(96,plain,
    ( ~ op_or
    | equal(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),or__dfg(u,v)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[95,66]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:95.0,66.1')] ).

cnf(97,plain,
    equal(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),or__dfg(u,v)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[96,4]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:96.0,4.0')] ).

cnf(100,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(or__dfg(skc98,skc98),skc98)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[97,90]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:97.0,90.0')] ).

cnf(102,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(u,v)),implies__dfg(u,v))),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[64,10]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:64.0,10.0')] ).

cnf(105,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(v) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[61,7]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:61.1,7.0')] ).

cnf(112,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(w,v),implies__dfg(or__dfg(u,w),v)))),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[79,17]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:79.0,17.0')] ).

cnf(209,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(u,v)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[102,105]),
    [iquote('0:Res:102.0,105.1')] ).

cnf(419,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(or__dfg(u,u),v))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[209,112]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:209.0,112.0')] ).

cnf(424,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,u)),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[209,89]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:209.0,89.0')] ).

cnf(526,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(or__dfg(u,u),v)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[419,105]),
    [iquote('0:Res:419.0,105.1')] ).

cnf(668,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(or__dfg(u,u),u)),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[526,424]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:526.0,424.0')] ).

cnf(679,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[668,100]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:668.0,100.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL453+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 12:36:09 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.22/0.51  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.22/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.51  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.22/0.51  SPASS derived 430 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 300 clauses.
% 0.22/0.51  SPASS allocated 98575 KBytes.
% 0.22/0.51  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.22/0.51  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.22/0.51  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.22/0.51  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.22/0.51  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.22/0.51  		0:00:00.03 for the reduction.
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 29 :
% 0.22/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.51  Formulae used in the proof : hilbert_op_or hilbert_op_implies_and hilbert_modus_ponens hilbert_implies_1 hilbert_implies_2 hilbert_or_3 luka_cn3 implies_1 cn3 op_implies_and modus_ponens implies_2 hilbert_and_3 and_3 op_or or_3
% 0.22/0.51  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------