↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL453+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:58:43 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   44
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  180 (  59 unt;  22 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  430 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  458 ( 208   ~; 202   |;   2   &)
%                                         (  31 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   36 (  34 usr;  34 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  145 (   0 sgn 144   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X0)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ( substitution_of_equivalents
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(equiv(X0,X1))
       => X0 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',substitution_of_equivalents) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_tollens) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_2) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ( and_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_2) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_3) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ( or_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_2) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ( equivalence_3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',equivalence_3) ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    ( cn3
  <=> ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),X0),X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn3) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_or) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

fof(f36,axiom,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    implies_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_2) ).

fof(f41,axiom,
    and_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_2) ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    and_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_3) ).

fof(f44,axiom,
    or_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_or_2) ).

fof(f48,axiom,
    equivalence_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_equivalence_3) ).

fof(f49,axiom,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',use_substitution_of_equivalents) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    cn3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',luka_cn3) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn3,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ~ cn3,
    inference(flattening,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),X0),X0))
   => cn3 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ( equivalence_3
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ( or_2
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( and_3
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ( and_2
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X1)) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ( implies_2
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( modus_tollens
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ( substitution_of_equivalents
   => ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(equiv(X0,X1))
       => X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
   => ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X0)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( X0 = X1
        | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ substitution_of_equivalents ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ modus_tollens ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X1))
    | ~ and_2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1)))
    | ~ or_2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1))))
    | ~ equivalence_3 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( cn3
    | ? [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),X0),X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( cn3
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f91]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f76]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X0,X1))
      | ~ substitution_of_equivalents ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1)))
      | ~ modus_tollens ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1)))
      | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f80]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X1))
      | ~ and_2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
      | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1)))
      | ~ or_2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1))))
      | ~ equivalence_3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ( cn3
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1)))
      | ~ op_or ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1)))
      | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    modus_tollens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    and_2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    or_2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    equivalence_3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ~ cn3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f145,definition,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> op_implies_and ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f149,definition,
    ( spl1_4
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1)))
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f149]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_3
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f113,f149,f145]) ).

fof(f153,definition,
    ( spl1_5
  <=> op_or ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f157,definition,
    ( spl1_6
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1)))
    | ~ spl1_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f157]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_5
    | spl1_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f112,f157,f153]) ).

fof(f161,definition,
    ( spl1_7
  <=> is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK0),sK0))
    | spl1_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f161]) ).

fof(f165,definition,
    ( spl1_8
  <=> cn3 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_7
    | spl1_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f111,f165,f161]) ).

fof(f170,definition,
    ( spl1_9
  <=> equivalence_3 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_9])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f174,definition,
    ( spl1_10
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1)))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_10])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1))))
    | ~ spl1_10 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f174]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_9
    | spl1_10 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f110,f174,f170]) ).

fof(f202,definition,
    ( spl1_17
  <=> or_2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_17])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f206,definition,
    ( spl1_18
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_18])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl1_18 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f206]) ).

fof(f208,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_17
    | spl1_18 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f106,f206,f202]) ).

fof(f218,definition,
    ( spl1_21
  <=> and_3 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_21])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f222,definition,
    ( spl1_22
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_22])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f223,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ spl1_22 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f224,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_21
    | spl1_22 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f104,f222,f218]) ).

fof(f226,definition,
    ( spl1_23
  <=> and_2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_23])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f230,definition,
    ( spl1_24
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X1)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_24])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X1))
    | ~ spl1_24 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f230]) ).

fof(f232,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_23
    | spl1_24 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f103,f230,f226]) ).

fof(f250,definition,
    ( spl1_29
  <=> implies_2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_29])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f254,definition,
    ( spl1_30
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_30])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f255,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl1_30 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f254]) ).

fof(f256,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_29
    | spl1_30 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f100,f254,f250]) ).

fof(f266,definition,
    ( spl1_33
  <=> modus_tollens ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_33])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f270,definition,
    ( spl1_34
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_34])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f271,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl1_34 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f270]) ).

fof(f272,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_33
    | spl1_34 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f98,f270,f266]) ).

fof(f274,definition,
    ( spl1_35
  <=> substitution_of_equivalents ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_35])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f278,definition,
    ( spl1_36
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( X0 = X1
        | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_36])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f279,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X0,X1))
        | X0 = X1 )
    | ~ spl1_36 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f278]) ).

fof(f280,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_35
    | spl1_36 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f97,f278,f274]) ).

fof(f282,definition,
    ( spl1_37
  <=> modus_ponens ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_37])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f286,definition,
    ( spl1_38
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_38])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f287,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | is_a_theorem(X1) )
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f286]) ).

fof(f288,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_37
    | spl1_38 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f96,f286,f282]) ).

fof(f289,plain,
    ~ spl1_8,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f135,f165]) ).

fof(f290,plain,
    spl1_5,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f115,f153]) ).

fof(f291,plain,
    spl1_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f116,f145]) ).

fof(f293,plain,
    spl1_37,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f118,f282]) ).

fof(f294,plain,
    spl1_33,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f119,f266]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    spl1_29,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f121,f250]) ).

fof(f299,plain,
    spl1_23,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f124,f226]) ).

fof(f300,plain,
    spl1_21,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f125,f218]) ).

fof(f302,plain,
    spl1_17,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f127,f202]) ).

fof(f306,plain,
    spl1_9,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f131,f170]) ).

fof(f307,plain,
    spl1_35,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f132,f274]) ).

fof(f317,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = implies(not(X0),X1)
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f158,f150]) ).

fof(f326,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(X0,or(X1,not(X0))))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | ~ spl1_18 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f207,f317]) ).

fof(f328,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK0,sK0),sK0))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | spl1_7 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f163,f317]) ).

fof(f332,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)))
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f255,f287]) ).

fof(f337,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X0)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | ~ spl1_34 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f271,f317]) ).

fof(f340,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(not(X0))),or(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | ~ spl1_34 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f337,f317]) ).

fof(f350,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1)))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f175,f287]) ).

fof(f404,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f332,f223]) ).

fof(f418,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X0,not(not(X1))))
        | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X0)) )
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | ~ spl1_34
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f340,f287]) ).

fof(f460,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | is_a_theorem(equiv(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f350,f287]) ).

fof(f883,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X0),X0))
        | is_a_theorem(equiv(and(X0,X0),X0)) )
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f460,f404]) ).

fof(f894,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(equiv(and(X0,X0),X0))
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f883,f231]) ).

fof(f912,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : and(X0,X0) = X0
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f894,f279]) ).

fof(f968,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : implies(not(X0),X0) = not(not(X0))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f150,f912]) ).

fof(f991,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : or(X0,X0) = not(not(X0))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f968,f317]) ).

fof(f1104,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(or(X0,not(not(not(X0)))))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f326,f991]) ).

fof(f1112,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(sK0)),sK0))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f328,f991]) ).

fof(f1113,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(not(sK0),sK0))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f1112,f317]) ).

fof(f1211,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(or(not(X0),X0))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_34
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1104,f418]) ).

fof(f1219,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_34
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1211,f1113]) ).

fof(f1224,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_34
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1219]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_3
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f151]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_5
    | spl1_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f159]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_7
    | spl1_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f168]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_9
    | spl1_10 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f176]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_17
    | spl1_18 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f208]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_21
    | spl1_22 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f224]) ).

cnf(s12,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_23
    | spl1_24 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f232]) ).

cnf(s15,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_29
    | spl1_30 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f256]) ).

cnf(s17,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_33
    | spl1_34 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f272]) ).

cnf(s18,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_35
    | spl1_36 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f280]) ).

cnf(s19,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_37
    | spl1_38 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f288]) ).

cnf(s20,plain,
    ~ spl1_8,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f289]) ).

cnf(s21,plain,
    spl1_5,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f290]) ).

cnf(s22,plain,
    spl1_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f291]) ).

cnf(s24,plain,
    spl1_37,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f293]) ).

cnf(s25,plain,
    spl1_33,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f294]) ).

cnf(s27,plain,
    spl1_29,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f296]) ).

cnf(s30,plain,
    spl1_23,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f299]) ).

cnf(s31,plain,
    spl1_21,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f300]) ).

cnf(s33,plain,
    spl1_17,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f302]) ).

cnf(s37,plain,
    spl1_9,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f306]) ).

cnf(s38,plain,
    spl1_35,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f307]) ).

cnf(s43,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_6
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_10
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_22
    | ~ spl1_24
    | ~ spl1_30
    | ~ spl1_34
    | ~ spl1_36
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f1224]) ).

cnf(s44,plain,
    spl1_38,
    inference(rat,[],[s19,s24]) ).

cnf(s45,plain,
    spl1_36,
    inference(rat,[],[s18,s38]) ).

cnf(s46,plain,
    spl1_34,
    inference(rat,[],[s17,s25]) ).

cnf(s48,plain,
    spl1_30,
    inference(rat,[],[s15,s27]) ).

cnf(s51,plain,
    spl1_24,
    inference(rat,[],[s12,s30]) ).

cnf(s52,plain,
    spl1_22,
    inference(rat,[],[s11,s31]) ).

cnf(s54,plain,
    spl1_18,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s33]) ).

cnf(s58,plain,
    spl1_10,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s37]) ).

cnf(s59,plain,
    ~ spl1_7,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s20]) ).

cnf(s60,plain,
    spl1_6,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s21]) ).

cnf(s61,plain,
    ~ spl1_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s43,s44,s45,s46,s48,s51,s52,s54,s58,s59,s60]) ).

cnf(s62,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s61,s22]) ).

fof(f1225,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s62]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL453+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:45:00 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.38  Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.38  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200954)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200959)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=4288398222_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % TRYING [1]
% 0.12/0.45  % TRYING [2]
% 0.12/0.45  % TRYING [3]
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200960)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200961)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=4079386606:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200960)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2061727363:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200962)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=1504808296:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % TRYING [4]
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200963)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1458507711:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200964)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=1676952524:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200965)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=3560021129:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200962) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2200954-2200962"...
% 0.12/0.45  % TRYING [5]
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200962)...printing done.
% 0.12/0.45  % (2200962)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200962)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200962)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200962)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200962)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200962)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200962)Time elapsed: 0.027 s
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200962)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200962)Instructions burned: 39 (million)
% 0.12/0.46  % (2200954)Success in time 0.061 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------