↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  30 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  26   ~;  20   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   8 sgn  21   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(implies_1,axiom,
    ( implies_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_1) ).

fof(or_1,axiom,
    ( or_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,or(X,Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',or_1) ).

fof(or_3,axiom,
    ( or_3
  <=> ! [X,Y,Z] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Z),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(or(X,Y),Z)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',or_3) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',r3) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X,Y] : or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_or) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_implies_and) ).

fof(principia_r3,conjecture,
    r3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',principia_r3) ).

fof(principia_r3_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[principia_r3]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A)))
    | ~ implies_1 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_1]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,or(A,B)))
    | ~ or_1 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[or_1]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,B),implies(or(A,C),B))))
    | ~ or_3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[or_3]) ).

fof(nnf_24,plain,
    ( ( ? [P,Q] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P)))
      | r3 )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
      | ~ r3 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3]) ).

fof(sk_r3_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK0,sK1),or(sK1,sK0)))
      | r3 )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
      | ~ r3 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(P,sK0),skolemize(Q,sK1)],[nnf_24]) ).

fof(sk_r3,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK0,sK1),or(sK1,sK0)))
      | r3 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(VAR_0,VAR_1),or(VAR_1,VAR_0)))
        | ~ r3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_r3_sk]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK0,sK1),or(sK1,sK0)))
    | r3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_r3]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    ( or(A,B) = not(and(not(A),not(B)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_or]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B)
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    ( not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and]) ).

fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

cnf(c_95,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_1,axiom,
    implies_1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_1) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    implies_1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).

fof(hilbert_or_1,axiom,
    or_1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_or_1) ).

cnf(c_106,plain,
    or_1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_1]) ).

fof(hilbert_or_3,axiom,
    or_3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_or_3) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    or_3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_3]) ).

cnf(c_115,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[principia_r3_neg]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_117,plain,
    not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_92]) ).

cnf(c_119,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_121,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_127,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,or(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_129,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,B),implies(or(A,C),B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_136,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK0,sK1),or(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_83]) ).

cnf(c_289,plain,
    implies(not(A),B) = or(A,B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_116]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    or(A,B) = implies(not(A),B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_289]) ).

cnf(c_290,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK1),or(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_136]) ).

cnf(c_141,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),sK1),implies(not(sK1),sK0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_290]) ).

cnf(c_143,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,B),implies(implies(not(A),C),B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_129]) ).

cnf(c_144,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_127]) ).

cnf(c_291,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(C)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,A)),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_121]) ).

cnf(c_259,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(not(C),A),implies(B,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_291,c_143]) ).

cnf(c_292,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(C)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(A),B)),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_144]) ).

cnf(c_287,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(A),B)),implies(implies(not(sK0),sK1),implies(not(sK1),sK0)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_292,c_141]) ).

cnf(c_288,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_287,c_259]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:36:03 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.34  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.34  % Process 3931787 was started by sandbox on n019,
% 0.08/0.34  % Fri Sep 25 22:36:03 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (93).
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.11/0.38  % Length of proof is 37.
% 0.11/0.38  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.11/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 70.000.
% 0.11/0.38  % Given clauses 50.
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------