↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:58:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 10.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  29 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  16   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (  64   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_tollens) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r3) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_and) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_or) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(f36,axiom,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(f51,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_and) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_r3) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ~ r3,
    inference(flattening,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
   => r3 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( modus_tollens
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ modus_tollens ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( r3
    | ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1)))
    | ~ op_and ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ modus_tollens
      | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK0,sK1),or(sK1,sK0)))
    | r3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_and
      | and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    modus_tollens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ~ r3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f113,f133]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f112,f116]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f111,f134]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f110,f115]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK0,sK1),or(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f109,f136]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f96,f119]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(implies(X0,not(X1))),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f140,f138]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = implies(not(X0),X1),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f141,f139]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : or(and(X0,not(X1)),X2) = implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(superposition,[],[f159,f139]) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : implies(implies(X0,not(X1)),X2) = or(and(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(superposition,[],[f138,f158]) ).

fof(f210,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(not(X0))),or(X0,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f155,f159]) ).

fof(f211,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(and(not(X1),not(X0)),or(X0,X1))),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f210,f196]) ).

fof(f217,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X0),or(X0,X1))),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f211,f186]) ).

fof(f220,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X0),or(X0,X1))),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f217,f159]) ).

fof(f276,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f220,f142]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.17/10.45  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.17/10.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/10.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/10.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/10.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/10.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/10.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/10.45  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:44:13 UTC 2026
% 0.17/10.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/10.46  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.17/10.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/10.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162805)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162812)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3254775440:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1019225563:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162811)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-4162805-4162814"...
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)...printing done.
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/10.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/10.54  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)------------------------------
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162814)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.21/10.54  % (4162805)Success in time 0.035 s
% 0.21/10.54  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------