↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:13:52 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   68 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  24   ~;  21   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   3 sgn  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(principia_r3,plain,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_r3) ).

fof(principia_r3_negated,plain,
    ~ r3,
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[principia_r3]) ).

cnf(81,plain,
    ~ r3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[principia_r3_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    ~ r3,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[81]) ).

fof(r3,plain,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P))) ),
    file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r3) ).

cnf(50,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK48,sK49),or(sK49,sK48)))
    | r3 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[r3]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK48,sK49),or(sK49,sK48)))
    | r3 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[50]) ).

fof(modus_ponens,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

cnf(0,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(l2,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK49,or(sK49,sK48)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK49,or(sK49,sK48)),implies(or(sK48,sK49),or(sK49,sK48))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK48,sK49),or(sK49,sK48))) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[0]) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[63]) ).

cnf(l4,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK48,or(sK49,sK48)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK48,or(sK49,sK48)),implies(implies(sK49,or(sK49,sK48)),implies(or(sK48,sK49),or(sK49,sK48)))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK49,or(sK49,sK48)),implies(or(sK48,sK49),or(sK49,sK48)))) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[0]) ).

cnf(l6,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[63]) ).

fof(or_3,plain,
    ( or_3
  <=> ! [X,Y,Z] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Z),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(or(X,Y),Z)))) ),
    file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_3) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    ( ~ or_3
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X2,X1),implies(or(X0,X2),X1)))) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[or_3]) ).

cnf(l20,plain,
    ( ~ or_3
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK48,or(sK49,sK48)),implies(implies(sK49,or(sK49,sK48)),implies(or(sK48,sK49),or(sK49,sK48))))) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

fof(hilbert_or_3,plain,
    or_3,
    file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_or_3) ).

cnf(73,plain,
    or_3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_or_3]) ).

cnf(l22,plain,
    or_3,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[73]) ).

fof(or_1,plain,
    ( or_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,or(X,Y))) ),
    file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_1) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( ~ or_1
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[or_1]) ).

cnf(l7,plain,
    ( ~ or_1
    | is_a_theorem(implies(sK49,or(sK49,sK48))) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

fof(r2,plain,
    ( r2
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q))) ),
    file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r2) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    ( ~ r2
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[r2]) ).

cnf(l21,plain,
    ( ~ r2
    | is_a_theorem(implies(sK48,or(sK49,sK48))) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[47]) ).

cnf(48,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK47,or(sK46,sK47)))
    | r2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[r2]) ).

cnf(l24,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK47,or(sK46,sK47)))
    | r2 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

fof(or_2,plain,
    ( or_2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(Y,or(X,Y))) ),
    file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_2) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    ( ~ or_2
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[or_2]) ).

cnf(l26,plain,
    ( ~ or_2
    | is_a_theorem(implies(sK47,or(sK46,sK47))) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

fof(hilbert_or_1,plain,
    or_1,
    file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_or_1) ).

cnf(71,plain,
    or_1,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_or_1]) ).

cnf(l8,plain,
    or_1,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[71]) ).

fof(hilbert_or_2,plain,
    or_2,
    file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_or_2) ).

cnf(72,plain,
    or_2,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_or_2]) ).

cnf(l31,plain,
    or_2,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[72]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l2,l3,l4,l6,l20,l22,l7,l21,l24,l26,l8,l31]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 18:42:44 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.13/0.36  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.13/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 11
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------