↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL458+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:44:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 23.71s 5.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 23.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   26
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   84 (  48 unt;   0 nHn;  42 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  130 (  19 equ;  50 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   16 (  14 usr;  14 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  105 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_51,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_28) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_21,plain,
    and_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_39,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_39) ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    implies_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_26) ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)))
    | ~ implies_1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_37) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    implies_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_56,plain,
    ( not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_56) ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_31) ).

cnf(i_0_55,plain,
    ( and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_30) ).

cnf(i_0_58,plain,
    ( not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) = or(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_or ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_58) ).

cnf(i_0_32,plain,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_32) ).

cnf(i_0_81,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ substitution_of_equivalents
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_81) ).

cnf(i_0_82,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_82) ).

cnf(i_0_57,plain,
    ( or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_57) ).

cnf(i_0_67,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_67) ).

cnf(i_0_53,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)))
    | ~ modus_tollens ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(i_0_74,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_74) ).

cnf(i_0_73,plain,
    ( r3
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk46_0,esk47_0),or(esk47_0,esk46_0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_73) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))))
    | ~ implies_3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    implies_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(i_0_77,plain,
    ( r5
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk52_0,esk53_0),implies(or(esk51_0,esk52_0),or(esk51_0,esk53_0)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_77) ).

cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-seskmsec/input.p',i_0_68) ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    i_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    and_3,
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    i_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    implies_2,
    i_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110])]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112])]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_114])]) ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)))
    | ~ implies_1 ),
    i_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    implies_1,
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    i_0_56 ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    i_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X2,X1)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_116]) ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    ( and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_124,plain,
    op_equiv,
    i_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_125,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_117]) ).

cnf(c_0_126,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_119])]) ).

cnf(c_0_127,plain,
    ( not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) = or(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_or ),
    i_0_58 ).

cnf(c_0_128,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121])]) ).

cnf(c_0_129,plain,
    op_or,
    i_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_130,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ substitution_of_equivalents
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
    i_0_81 ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    i_0_82 ).

cnf(c_0_132,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_122]) ).

cnf(c_0_133,plain,
    and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_123,c_0_124])]) ).

cnf(c_0_134,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_125,c_0_126]) ).

cnf(c_0_135,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_128]),c_0_129])]) ).

cnf(c_0_136,plain,
    ( or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    i_0_57 ).

cnf(c_0_137,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    i_0_67 ).

cnf(c_0_138,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)))
    | ~ modus_tollens ),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_139,plain,
    modus_tollens,
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_140,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_130,c_0_131])]) ).

cnf(c_0_141,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_132,c_0_133]) ).

cnf(c_0_142,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(X1,not(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_134,c_0_135]) ).

cnf(c_0_143,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_136,c_0_137])]) ).

cnf(c_0_144,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_138,c_0_135]),c_0_139])]) ).

cnf(c_0_145,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_140,c_0_141]) ).

cnf(c_0_146,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(not(X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_142,c_0_143]) ).

cnf(c_0_147,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(not(X2))),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_144,c_0_135]) ).

cnf(c_0_148,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_146]),c_0_135]),c_0_143]),c_0_134])]) ).

cnf(c_0_149,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    i_0_74 ).

cnf(c_0_150,plain,
    ( r3
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk46_0,esk47_0),or(esk47_0,esk46_0))) ),
    i_0_73 ).

cnf(c_0_151,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_147,c_0_148]) ).

cnf(c_0_152,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))))
    | ~ implies_3 ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_153,plain,
    implies_3,
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_154,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),or(X2,not(X1))))
    | ~ r3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_149,c_0_143]) ).

cnf(c_0_155,plain,
    r3,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_150,c_0_151])]) ).

cnf(c_0_156,plain,
    ( r5
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk52_0,esk53_0),implies(or(esk51_0,esk52_0),or(esk51_0,esk53_0)))) ),
    i_0_77 ).

cnf(c_0_157,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r5,
    i_0_68 ).

cnf(c_0_158,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_152,c_0_153])]) ).

cnf(c_0_159,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),or(X2,not(X1)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_154,c_0_155])]) ).

cnf(c_0_160,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk52_0,esk53_0),implies(or(esk51_0,esk52_0),or(esk51_0,esk53_0)))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_156,c_0_157]) ).

cnf(c_0_161,plain,
    or(X1,X2) = or(X2,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_151]),c_0_151])]) ).

cnf(c_0_162,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),or(X1,X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_158,c_0_135]),c_0_135]) ).

cnf(c_0_163,plain,
    or(X1,not(X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_159]),c_0_144])]) ).

cnf(c_0_164,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk52_0,esk53_0),implies(or(esk52_0,esk51_0),or(esk53_0,esk51_0)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_160,c_0_161]),c_0_161]) ).

cnf(c_0_165,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X1,X3),or(X2,X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_162,c_0_135]),c_0_163]) ).

cnf(c_0_166,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_164,c_0_165])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL458+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 16:01:16 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.40  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.12/0.40  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.40  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.12/0.40  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.12/0.40  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 23.71/5.30  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 23.71/5.30  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 23.71/5.30  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 23.71/5.30  
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof found!
% 23.71/5.30  # SZS status Theorem
% 23.71/5.30  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object total steps             : 84
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object clause steps            : 58
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object formula steps           : 26
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object conjectures             : 2
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 26
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 26
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object generating inferences   : 15
% 23.71/5.30  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 44
% 23.71/5.30  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 23.71/5.30  # Parsed axioms                        : 82
% 23.71/5.30  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Initial clauses                      : 82
% 23.71/5.30  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 82
% 23.71/5.30  # Processed clauses                    : 2003
% 23.71/5.30  # ...of these trivial                  : 158
% 23.71/5.30  # ...subsumed                          : 1127
% 23.71/5.30  # ...remaining for further processing  : 718
% 23.71/5.30  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Backward-subsumed                    : 19
% 23.71/5.30  # Backward-rewritten                   : 246
% 23.71/5.30  # Generated clauses                    : 74222
% 23.71/5.30  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 65213
% 23.71/5.30  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 201
% 23.71/5.30  # Paramodulations                      : 74222
% 23.71/5.30  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Current number of processed clauses  : 453
% 23.71/5.30  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 133
% 23.71/5.30  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 31
% 23.71/5.30  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 23.71/5.30  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 280
% 23.71/5.30  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 46926
% 23.71/5.30  # ...number of literals in the above   : 108677
% 23.71/5.30  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Current number of archived clauses   : 265
% 23.71/5.30  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34930
% 23.71/5.30  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32651
% 23.71/5.30  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 963
% 23.71/5.30  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2338
% 23.71/5.30  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 373
% 23.71/5.30  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6125
% 23.71/5.30  # BW rewrite match successes           : 523
% 23.71/5.30  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 23.71/5.30  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 914585
% 23.71/5.30  
% 23.71/5.30  # -------------------------------------------------
% 23.71/5.30  # User time                : 1.366 s
% 23.71/5.30  # System time              : 0.056 s
% 23.71/5.30  # Total time               : 1.422 s
% 23.71/5.30  # ...preprocessing         : 0.017 s
% 23.71/5.30  # ...main loop             : 1.405 s
% 23.71/5.30  # Maximum resident set size: 57344 pages
% 23.71/5.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------