%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL461+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:50 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 16.21s 3.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 16.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 20
% Number of leaves : 28
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 122 ( 64 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 223 ( 39 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 173 ( 72 ~; 70 |; 15 &)
% ( 11 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 17 ( 15 usr; 15 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 29 ( 29 usr; 24 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 177 ( 10 sgn 60 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
( modus_ponens
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
& is_a_theorem(X1) )
=> is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).
fof(and_3,axiom,
( and_3
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_3) ).
fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
modus_ponens,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).
fof(hilbert_and_3,axiom,
and_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_3) ).
fof(op_equiv,axiom,
( op_equiv
=> ! [X1,X2] : equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_equiv) ).
fof(implies_2,axiom,
( implies_2
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_2) ).
fof(substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
( substitution_of_equivalents
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
=> X1 = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',substitution_of_equivalents) ).
fof(hilbert_op_equiv,axiom,
op_equiv,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_equiv) ).
fof(hilbert_implies_2,axiom,
implies_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_2) ).
fof(use_substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
substitution_of_equivalents,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',use_substitution_of_equivalents) ).
fof(and_1,axiom,
( and_1
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_1) ).
fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
( op_implies_and
=> ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).
fof(hilbert_and_1,axiom,
and_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_1) ).
fof(op_or,axiom,
( op_or
=> ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).
fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
op_implies_and,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).
fof(or_1,axiom,
( or_1
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_1) ).
fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
op_or,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_or) ).
fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
( modus_tollens
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),not(X1)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_tollens) ).
fof(hilbert_or_1,axiom,
or_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_or_1) ).
fof(hilbert_modus_tollens,axiom,
modus_tollens,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).
fof(and_2,axiom,
( and_2
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_2) ).
fof(implies_1,axiom,
( implies_1
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_1) ).
fof(hilbert_and_2,axiom,
and_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_2) ).
fof(hilbert_implies_1,axiom,
implies_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_1) ).
fof(implies_3,axiom,
( implies_3
<=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_3) ).
fof(rosser_kn3,conjecture,
kn3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rosser_kn3) ).
fof(hilbert_implies_3,axiom,
implies_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_3) ).
fof(kn3,axiom,
( kn3
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(not(and(X5,X6)),not(and(X6,X4))))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn3) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( modus_ponens
| ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0) )
& ( modus_ponens
| is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0)) )
& ( modus_ponens
| is_a_theorem(esk1_0) )
& ( is_a_theorem(X8)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X7,X8))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X7)
| ~ modus_ponens ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X41,X42] :
( ( and_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk18_0,implies(esk19_0,and(esk18_0,esk19_0)))) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(X41,implies(X42,and(X41,X42))))
| ~ and_3 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[and_3])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ modus_ponens
| is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
modus_ponens,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ and_3
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
and_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X125,X126] :
( equiv(X125,X126) = and(implies(X125,X126),implies(X126,X125))
| ~ op_equiv ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_equiv])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_37,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( ( implies_2
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk9_0,implies(esk9_0,esk10_0)),implies(esk9_0,esk10_0))) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X23,implies(X23,X24)),implies(X23,X24)))
| ~ implies_2 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_38,plain,
! [X11,X12] :
( ( substitution_of_equivalents
| esk3_0 != esk4_0 )
& ( substitution_of_equivalents
| is_a_theorem(equiv(esk3_0,esk4_0)) )
& ( X11 = X12
| ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X11,X12))
| ~ substitution_of_equivalents ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[substitution_of_equivalents])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X2,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ op_equiv
| equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
op_equiv,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_equiv]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ implies_2
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
implies_2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
| ~ substitution_of_equivalents
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
substitution_of_equivalents,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[use_substitution_of_equivalents]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43])]) ).
fof(c_0_49,plain,
! [X33,X34] :
( ( and_1
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk14_0,esk15_0),esk14_0)) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X33,X34),X33))
| ~ and_1 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[and_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_50,plain,
! [X121,X122] :
( implies(X121,X122) = not(and(X121,not(X122)))
| ~ op_implies_and ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45])]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ and_1
| is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
and_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_1]) ).
fof(c_0_56,plain,
! [X117,X118] :
( or(X117,X118) = not(and(not(X117),not(X118)))
| ~ op_or ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ op_implies_and
| implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
op_implies_and,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).
fof(c_0_59,plain,
! [X45,X46] :
( ( or_1
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk20_0,or(esk20_0,esk21_0))) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(X45,or(X45,X46)))
| ~ or_1 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[or_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55])]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ~ op_or
| or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58])]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
op_or,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).
fof(c_0_66,plain,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( modus_tollens
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X16),not(X15)),implies(X15,X16)))
| ~ modus_tollens ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( ~ or_1
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_59]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
or_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
and(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_62])]) ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_65])]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( ~ modus_tollens
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
modus_tollens,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_tollens]) ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68])]) ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
not(not(X1)) = or(X1,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_69]),c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_70]),c_0_72])]) ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
is_a_theorem(or(X1,or(not(X1),X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_70]) ).
fof(c_0_77,plain,
! [X37,X38] :
( ( and_2
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk16_0,esk17_0),esk17_0)) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X37,X38),X38))
| ~ and_2 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[and_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_78,plain,
! [X19,X20] :
( ( implies_1
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk7_0,implies(esk8_0,esk7_0))) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(X19,implies(X20,X19)))
| ~ implies_1 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(not(X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,not(X1)))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_75]) ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
is_a_theorem(or(X1,not(not(not(X1))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_74]) ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( ~ and_2
| is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
and_2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
( ~ implies_1
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_78]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
implies_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(or(not(X1),X1))
| not(not(X1)) = X1 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_79]),c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
is_a_theorem(or(not(X1),X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X2)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_83])]) ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_85])]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
not(not(X1)) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87])]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| and(X1,X2) = X2 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_39]),c_0_88])]) ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_89]) ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
not(and(X1,X2)) = implies(X1,not(X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
and(implies(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).
fof(c_0_95,plain,
! [X27,X28,X29] :
( ( implies_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0)))) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X27,X28),implies(implies(X28,X29),implies(X27,X29))))
| ~ implies_3 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_3])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_96,plain,
implies(implies(X1,X1),not(X2)) = not(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]) ).
fof(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
~ kn3,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[rosser_kn3]) ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
( ~ implies_3
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_95]) ).
cnf(c_0_99,plain,
implies_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_100,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,and(X2,X1)),X2))
| implies(X1,and(X2,X1)) = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_101,plain,
implies(implies(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_102,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_89]) ).
fof(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
~ kn3,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_97]) ).
cnf(c_0_104,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_99])]) ).
cnf(c_0_105,plain,
and(X1,implies(X2,X2)) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]),c_0_62])]) ).
cnf(c_0_106,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_102]) ).
fof(c_0_107,plain,
! [X77,X78,X79] :
( ( kn3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(not(and(esk37_0,esk38_0)),not(and(esk38_0,esk36_0))))) )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X77,X78),implies(not(and(X78,X79)),not(and(X79,X77)))))
| ~ kn3 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn3])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
~ kn3,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_103]) ).
cnf(c_0_109,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),implies(X3,X1)))
| implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)) = implies(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_104]) ).
cnf(c_0_110,plain,
implies(X1,not(implies(X2,X2))) = not(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_105]) ).
cnf(c_0_111,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_102]) ).
cnf(c_0_112,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(not(and(esk37_0,esk38_0)),not(and(esk38_0,esk36_0)))))
| kn3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_107]) ).
cnf(c_0_113,negated_conjecture,
~ kn3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_108]) ).
cnf(c_0_114,plain,
or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
or(X1,not(X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]),c_0_110]),c_0_70]),c_0_110]),c_0_70]),c_0_75])]) ).
cnf(c_0_116,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| implies(X1,X1) = X2 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_61]),c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_117,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),or(and(esk37_0,esk38_0),not(and(esk38_0,esk36_0))))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_70]),c_0_113]) ).
cnf(c_0_118,plain,
or(and(X1,X2),X3) = implies(implies(X1,not(X2)),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_93]) ).
cnf(c_0_119,plain,
implies(X1,not(X2)) = implies(X2,not(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_115]) ).
cnf(c_0_120,plain,
implies(X1,X1) = implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(implies(X3,X4),implies(X2,X4))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_104]) ).
cnf(c_0_121,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_118]),c_0_93]),c_0_119]),c_0_120]),c_0_92])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL461+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:34:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 16.21/3.73 % Version: 3.5.1
% 16.21/3.73 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 16.21/3.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % new_bool_3 with pid 1314763 completed with status 9
% 16.21/3.73 % new_bool_1 with pid 1314764 completed with status 9
% 16.21/3.73 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 1314762 completed with status 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 16.21/3.73 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 16.21/3.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 16.21/3.73 % No SInE strategy applied
% 16.21/3.73 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 16.21/3.73 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 1314775 completed with status 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 16.21/3.73 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 16.21/3.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 16.21/3.73 % No SInE strategy applied
% 16.21/3.73 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 16.21/3.73 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 16.21/3.73 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 16.21/3.73 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 16.21/3.73
% 16.21/3.73 % Proof found!
% 16.21/3.73 % SZS status Theorem
% 16.21/3.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 16.21/3.73 % Parsed axioms : 53
% 16.21/3.73 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Initial clauses : 82
% 16.21/3.73 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 16.21/3.73 % Processed clauses : 19830
% 16.21/3.73 % ...of these trivial : 599
% 16.21/3.73 % ...subsumed : 17391
% 16.21/3.73 % ...remaining for further processing : 1839
% 16.21/3.73 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Backward-subsumed : 80
% 16.21/3.73 % Backward-rewritten : 426
% 16.21/3.73 % Generated clauses : 136161
% 16.21/3.73 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 112943
% 16.21/3.73 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 16.21/3.73 % Paramodulations : 136161
% 16.21/3.73 % Factorizations : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % NegExts : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Total rewrite steps : 188103
% 16.21/3.73 % ...of those cached : 176170
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional check models : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 16.21/3.73 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 16.21/3.73 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 16.21/3.73 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 16.21/3.73 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 16.21/3.73 % Current number of processed clauses : 1276
% 16.21/3.73 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 132
% 16.21/3.73 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 25
% 16.21/3.73 % Negative unit clauses : 15
% 16.21/3.73 % Non-unit-clauses : 1104
% 16.21/3.73 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 86772
% 16.21/3.73 % ...number of literals in the above : 178968
% 16.21/3.73 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Current number of archived clauses : 563
% 16.21/3.73 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 194814
% 16.21/3.73 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 187231
% 16.21/3.73 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14644
% 16.21/3.73 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4001
% 16.21/3.73 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5368
% 16.21/3.73 % BW rewrite match successes : 620
% 16.21/3.73 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Condensation successes : 0
% 16.21/3.73 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1962502
% 16.21/3.73 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1092
% 16.21/3.73
% 16.21/3.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 16.21/3.73 % User time : 3.098 s
% 16.21/3.73 % System time : 0.108 s
% 16.21/3.73 % Total time : 3.206 s
% 16.21/3.73 % Maximum resident set size: 3944 pages
% 16.21/3.73
% 16.21/3.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 16.21/3.73 % User time : 15.454 s
% 16.21/3.73 % System time : 0.667 s
% 16.21/3.73 % Total time : 16.121 s
% 16.21/3.73 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 16.21/3.73 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------