↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL463+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 169.31s 22.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 169.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  33 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  33   ~;  26   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  109 (  16 sgn  16   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(implies_1,axiom,
    ( implies_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_1) ).

fof(cn1,axiom,
    ( cn1
  <=> ! [P,Q,R] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(implies(Q,R),implies(P,R)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn1) ).

fof(cn2,axiom,
    ( cn2
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(P,implies(not(P),Q))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn2) ).

fof(cn3,axiom,
    ( cn3
  <=> ! [P] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(P),P),P)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn3) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_1,conjecture,
    implies_1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_1) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ implies_1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens]) ).

fof(nnf_4,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X)))
      | implies_1 )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0)))
      | ~ implies_1 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_1]) ).

fof(sk_implies_1_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0)))
      | implies_1 )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0)))
      | ~ implies_1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK1)],[nnf_4]) ).

fof(sk_implies_1,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0)))
      | implies_1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,implies(VAR_1,VAR_0)))
        | ~ implies_1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_implies_1_sk]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0)))
    | implies_1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_implies_1]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C))))
    | ~ cn1 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cn1]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B)))
    | ~ cn2 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cn2]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A))
    | ~ cn3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cn3]) ).

fof(luka_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('theBenchmark.p',luka_modus_ponens) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[luka_modus_ponens]) ).

fof(luka_cn1,axiom,
    cn1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',luka_cn1) ).

cnf(c_99,plain,
    cn1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[luka_cn1]) ).

fof(luka_cn2,axiom,
    cn2,
    file('theBenchmark.p',luka_cn2) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    cn2,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[luka_cn2]) ).

fof(luka_cn3,axiom,
    cn3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',luka_cn3) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    cn3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[luka_cn3]) ).

cnf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    ~ implies_1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_107,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_72]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_74]) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_76]) ).

cnf(c_113,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_132,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_134,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),A),A),B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_20624,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),A),A),B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_110]) ).

cnf(c_142,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),A),A),implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20624,c_113]) ).

cnf(c_145,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_110]) ).

cnf(c_146,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(A,C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_109]) ).

cnf(c_147,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_108]) ).

cnf(c_152,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(not(implies(sK1,sK0)),implies(sK1,sK0)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_142]) ).

cnf(c_466,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_137]) ).

cnf(c_20625,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,C))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_146]) ).

cnf(c_479,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),A),implies(not(implies(sK1,sK0)),implies(sK1,sK0)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20625,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_507,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_466,c_134]) ).

cnf(c_508,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,A),B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_466,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_596,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(C)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_507,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_666,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(C,A),D))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_1408,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_666,c_147]) ).

cnf(c_1409,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_666,c_146]) ).

cnf(c_1420,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),D),implies(implies(B,not(A)),D))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1409,c_132]) ).

cnf(c_14205,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,not(A)),D))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1420,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_18933,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1408,c_107]) ).

cnf(c_19030,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18933,c_145]) ).

cnf(c_19469,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(implies(A,C),implies(B,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19030,c_14205]) ).

cnf(c_19521,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(not(B),not(D)),implies(A,implies(D,C))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19469,c_18933]) ).

cnf(c_19544,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),implies(C,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19469,c_596]) ).

cnf(c_20091,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19544,c_508]) ).

cnf(c_20626,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(C)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,B)),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_20091]) ).

cnf(c_20622,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,B)),implies(implies(not(sK0),C),implies(not(implies(sK1,sK0)),implies(sK1,sK0))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20626,c_479]) ).

cnf(c_20623,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20622,c_19521]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL463+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:38:54 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.13/0.36  % Process 3638388 was started by sandbox on n026,
% 0.13/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 22:38:54 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 169.31/22.83  
% 169.31/22.83  % Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (94).
% 169.31/22.83  
% 169.31/22.83  % given #500 (F,wt=37): 14228 -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(c8),B)),not(implies(C,C)))).  [ur(107,b,1420,a,c,1494,a)].
% 169.31/22.83  
% 169.31/22.83  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 169.31/22.83  
% 169.31/22.83  % Proof 1 at 4.86 (+ 1.39) seconds.
% 169.31/22.83  % Length of proof is 47.
% 169.31/22.83  % Level of proof is 13.
% 169.31/22.83  % Maximum clause weight is 50.000.
% 169.31/22.83  % Given clauses 759.
% 169.31/22.83  
% 169.31/22.83  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------