%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : LCL465+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 2 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(hilbert_implies_3,conjecture,
implies_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',hilbert_implies_3) ).
fof(implies_3,axiom,
( implies_3
<=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_3) ).
fof(cn1,axiom,
( cn1
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn1) ).
fof(luka_cn1,axiom,
cn1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_cn1) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ implies_3,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ implies_3
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0))))
| implies_3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_3])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ implies_3,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ cn1
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X7,X8),implies(implies(X8,X9),implies(X7,X9)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0))))
| cn1 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( implies_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ implies_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))))
| ~ cn1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
cn1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_cn1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0)))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LCL465+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 2 22:52:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.41 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 43
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 41
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 531
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2736 pages
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 15
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 43
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 72
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 72
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 67
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 85
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 71
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 85
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 37
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 160
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 52
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 52
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 30
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5106
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3324 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------