↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LCL469+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:40:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.31s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  13   ~;  10   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   3 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(cn2,axiom,
    ( cn2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(X4,implies(not(X4),X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn2) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(or_1,axiom,
    ( or_1
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_1) ).

fof(hilbert_or_1,conjecture,
    or_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_or_1) ).

fof(luka_cn2,axiom,
    cn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_cn2) ).

fof(luka_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_op_or) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X186,X187] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X186,X187) = not(and(X186,not(X187))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X154,X155] :
      ( ( ~ cn2
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X154,implies(not(X154),X155))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk42_0,implies(not(esk42_0),esk43_0)))
        | cn2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X182,X183] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X182,X183) = not(and(not(X182),not(X183))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X110,X111] :
      ( ( ~ or_1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X110,or(X110,X111))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk20_0,or(esk20_0,esk21_0)))
        | or_1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[or_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ or_1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_or_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2)))
    | ~ cn2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    cn2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_cn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_op_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( or_1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk20_0,or(esk20_0,esk21_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ or_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk20_0,or(esk20_0,esk21_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL469+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 22:39:53 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.31/1.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.31/1.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.31/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.31/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.31/1.62  % Total time : 1.272s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------