↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL469+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.87s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  18   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  40   !;   2   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,axiom,
    ( or_1
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_1) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ( cn2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn2) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(f37,axiom,
    cn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_cn2) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

fof(f41,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(f43,conjecture,
    or_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_or_1) ).

fof(f44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ or_1,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f43]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ~ or_1,
    inference(flattening,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ( cn2
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1)))
   => or_1 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1)))
    | or_1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ( ~ cn2
    | ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ( ~ op_or
    | ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( ~ op_implies_and
    | ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,or(sK0,sK1)))
    | or_1 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f58]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,or(sK0,sK1)))
    | or_1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ cn2
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    cn2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ~ or_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ( or_1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,or(sK0,sK1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1)))
      | ~ cn2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) = or(X0,X1) )
      | ~ op_or ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( not(and(X0,not(X1))) = implies(X0,X1) )
      | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f73]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    cn2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    ~ or_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,or(sK0,sK1))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_68,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_81,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_62,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : not(and(X0,not(X1))) = implies(X0,X1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_66,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_92,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) = or(X0,X1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_65,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : implies(not(X0),X1) = or(X0,X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_87]) ).

tcf(c_153,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_151]) ).

tcf(c_154,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_153]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL469+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 23:32:03 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44  % Proving...
% 1.87/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.28  
% 1.87/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.87/1.28  
% 1.87/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.87/1.28  
% 1.87/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.87/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.87/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.87/1.28  
% 1.87/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.87/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.87/1.28  
% 1.87/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 1.87/1.28  
% 1.87/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.28  
% 1.87/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.87/1.28  
% 1.87/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------