↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL470+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 101.65s 26.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 101.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   27
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  122 (  49 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  240 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  217 (  99   ~;  97   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;  10 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  227 (  34 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
          & is_a_theorem(X1) )
       => is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

fof(cn1,axiom,
    ( cn1
  <=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn1) ).

fof(luka_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_modus_ponens) ).

fof(luka_cn1,axiom,
    cn1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_cn1) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(cn3,axiom,
    ( cn3
  <=> ! [X4] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X4),X4),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn3) ).

fof(luka_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_op_or) ).

fof(luka_cn3,axiom,
    cn3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_cn3) ).

fof(cn2,axiom,
    ( cn2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(X4,implies(not(X4),X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn2) ).

fof(luka_cn2,axiom,
    cn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_cn2) ).

fof(op_equiv,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X1,X2] : equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_equiv) ).

fof(luka_op_equiv,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',luka_op_equiv) ).

fof(substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
    ( substitution_of_equivalents
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
       => X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',substitution_of_equivalents) ).

fof(use_substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+3.ax',use_substitution_of_equivalents) ).

fof(hilbert_or_2,conjecture,
    or_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_or_2) ).

fof(or_2,axiom,
    ( or_2
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X2,or(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_2) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( modus_ponens
        | ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0) )
      & ( modus_ponens
        | is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0)) )
      & ( modus_ponens
        | is_a_theorem(esk1_0) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(X8)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X7,X8))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X7)
        | ~ modus_ponens ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X83,X84,X85] :
      ( ( cn1
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X83,X84),implies(implies(X84,X85),implies(X83,X85))))
        | ~ cn1 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ cn1
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    cn1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_cn1]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X121,X122] :
      ( implies(X121,X122) = not(and(X121,not(X122)))
      | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X117,X118] :
      ( or(X117,X118) = not(and(not(X117),not(X118)))
      | ~ op_or ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ op_implies_and
    | implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X93] :
      ( ( cn3
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk44_0),esk44_0),esk44_0)) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X93),X93),X93))
        | ~ cn3 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn3])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ op_or
    | or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_op_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ cn3
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    cn3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_cn3]) ).

fof(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X89,X90] :
      ( ( cn2
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk42_0,implies(not(esk42_0),esk43_0))) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(X89,implies(not(X89),X90)))
        | ~ cn2 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn2])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ cn2
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    cn2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_cn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X3,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X3,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X1,not(X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_39]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    or(and(X1,not(X2)),X3) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X3,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),or(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_39]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X4),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X1,implies(X3,X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_33]),c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(X3,X4),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X1,or(X3,X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(X1,or(not(X1),X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_39]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(not(X1),X3),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,or(X2,X2)),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_39]) ).

fof(c_0_63,plain,
    ! [X125,X126] :
      ( equiv(X125,X126) = and(implies(X125,X126),implies(X126,X125))
      | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_equiv])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,or(X1,X1)))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( ~ op_equiv
    | equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[luka_op_equiv]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_39]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    not(and(X1,implies(X2,X3))) = implies(X1,and(X2,not(X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67])]) ).

fof(c_0_72,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] :
      ( ( substitution_of_equivalents
        | esk3_0 != esk4_0 )
      & ( substitution_of_equivalents
        | is_a_theorem(equiv(esk3_0,esk4_0)) )
      & ( X11 = X12
        | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X11,X12))
        | ~ substitution_of_equivalents ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[substitution_of_equivalents])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(X2,X3),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(not(X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),and(X2,not(X1))) = not(equiv(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    implies(X1,and(not(X2),not(X3))) = not(and(X1,or(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
    | ~ substitution_of_equivalents
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[use_substitution_of_equivalents]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(not(X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(or(equiv(X1,X2),and(X2,not(X1)))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_75]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(and(not(X1),or(X2,X3))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_76]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X3,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),or(X1,X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_39]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78])]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(and(not(X1),or(X3,X4)),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_81]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X4))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_83]) ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_85]) ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X4),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(or(X1,X1),or(X1,X1)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_88]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X1),or(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    or(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_44]),c_0_62])]) ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X4))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(or(implies(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | or(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_94]),c_0_62])]) ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | or(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]),c_0_97]),c_0_97]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(or(implies(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_44]) ).

fof(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
    ~ or_2,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_or_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X4))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X4,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,X1))
    | or(X1,not(X2)) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    or(implies(X1,X1),X2) = implies(X1,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_44]),c_0_97]),c_0_97]) ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_90]) ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(implies(X1,X1),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_62]) ).

fof(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
    ~ or_2,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_102]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X2,X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),implies(X3,or(X1,X4)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_83]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    or(X1,not(implies(X2,X2))) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_105]),c_0_106])]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]) ).

fof(c_0_113,plain,
    ! [X49,X50] :
      ( ( or_2
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk23_0,or(esk22_0,esk23_0))) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(X50,or(X49,X50)))
        | ~ or_2 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[or_2])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
    ~ or_2,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_109]) ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_111]),c_0_39]),c_0_105]),c_0_112])]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk23_0,or(esk22_0,esk23_0)))
    | or_2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_113]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
    ~ or_2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_114]) ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_111]) ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk23_0,or(esk22_0,esk23_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_117]) ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_119,c_0_120])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL470+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:35:16 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 101.65/26.06  % Version: 3.5.1
% 101.65/26.06  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 101.65/26.06  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % new_bool_3 with pid 583127 completed with status 9
% 101.65/26.06  % new_bool_1 with pid 583128 completed with status 9
% 101.65/26.06  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 583126 completed with status 0
% 101.65/26.06  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 101.65/26.06  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 101.65/26.06  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 101.65/26.06  % No SInE strategy applied
% 101.65/26.06  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 101.65/26.06  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 583137 completed with status 0
% 101.65/26.06  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 101.65/26.06  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 101.65/26.06  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 101.65/26.06  % No SInE strategy applied
% 101.65/26.06  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 101.65/26.06  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 101.65/26.06  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 101.65/26.06  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 101.65/26.06  
% 101.65/26.06  % Proof found!
% 101.65/26.06  % SZS status Theorem
% 101.65/26.06  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 101.65/26.07  % Parsed axioms                        : 43
% 101.65/26.07  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Initial clauses                      : 72
% 101.65/26.07  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 72
% 101.65/26.07  % Processed clauses                    : 48368
% 101.65/26.07  % ...of these trivial                  : 1244
% 101.65/26.07  % ...subsumed                          : 41556
% 101.65/26.07  % ...remaining for further processing  : 5568
% 101.65/26.07  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Backward-subsumed                    : 470
% 101.65/26.07  % Backward-rewritten                   : 382
% 101.65/26.07  % Generated clauses                    : 808165
% 101.65/26.07  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 704230
% 101.65/26.07  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 8
% 101.65/26.07  % Paramodulations                      : 808165
% 101.65/26.07  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % NegExts                              : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Total rewrite steps                  : 526960
% 101.65/26.07  % ...of those cached                   : 505305
% 101.65/26.07  % Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 101.65/26.07  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 101.65/26.07  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 101.65/26.07  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 101.65/26.07  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 101.65/26.07  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 101.65/26.07  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 101.65/26.07  %    Propositional encoding time       : 1.222
% 101.65/26.07  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.736
% 101.65/26.07  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 101.65/26.07  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 101.65/26.07  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 101.65/26.07  % Current number of processed clauses  : 4656
% 101.65/26.07  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 451
% 101.65/26.07  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 101.65/26.07  %    Negative unit clauses             : 17
% 101.65/26.07  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4186
% 101.65/26.07  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 649786
% 101.65/26.07  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1480645
% 101.65/26.07  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Current number of archived clauses   : 912
% 101.65/26.07  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1180831
% 101.65/26.07  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1095745
% 101.65/26.07  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 39623
% 101.65/26.07  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26870
% 101.65/26.07  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 31607
% 101.65/26.07  % BW rewrite match successes           : 197
% 101.65/26.07  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 101.65/26.07  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 17285021
% 101.65/26.07  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1092
% 101.65/26.07  
% 101.65/26.07  % -------------------------------------------------
% 101.65/26.07  % User time                : 19.522 s
% 101.65/26.07  % System time              : 0.781 s
% 101.65/26.07  % Total time               : 20.303 s
% 101.65/26.07  % Maximum resident set size: 3944 pages
% 101.65/26.07  
% 101.65/26.07  % -------------------------------------------------
% 101.65/26.07  % User time                : 97.908 s
% 101.65/26.07  % System time              : 3.571 s
% 101.65/26.07  % Total time               : 101.479 s
% 101.65/26.07  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 101.65/26.07  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------