↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LCL483+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  17   ~;  12   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(hilbert_modus_tollens,conjecture,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),not(X1)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_tollens) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X5),or(X5,X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r3) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',hilbert_op_or) ).

fof(principia_r3,axiom,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r3) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_modus_tollens]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X3,X4) = not(and(X3,not(X4))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ modus_tollens
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X4),not(X3)),implies(X3,X4))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0)))
        | modus_tollens ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X3,X4) = not(and(not(X3),not(X4))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ r3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X6,X7),or(X7,X6))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0)))
        | r3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X3,X4) = or(not(X3),X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( modus_tollens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    r3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r3]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk6_0,not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : LCL483+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 00:57:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.24/1.40  
% 0.24/1.40  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.24/1.40  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.24/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 45
% 0.24/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 43
% 0.24/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.24/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.24/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.24/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.24/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.24/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.24/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.24/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.24/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 512
% 0.24/1.40  
% 0.24/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.40  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.24/1.40  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.24/1.40  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.24/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 2736 pages
% 0.24/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 0.24/1.40  
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 35
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 18
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 17
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.24/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 0.24/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 45
% 0.24/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 74
% 0.24/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 74
% 0.24/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 300
% 0.24/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 11
% 0.24/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 78
% 0.24/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 211
% 0.24/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 12
% 0.24/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 13
% 0.24/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 889
% 0.24/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 800
% 0.24/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 21
% 0.24/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 889
% 0.24/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 186
% 0.24/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 39
% 0.24/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.24/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 144
% 0.24/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 529
% 0.24/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1080
% 0.24/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 25
% 0.24/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5553
% 0.24/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5438
% 0.24/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 108
% 0.24/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 203
% 0.24/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 46
% 0.24/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 13
% 0.24/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 15977
% 0.24/1.40  
% 0.24/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.40  # User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.24/1.40  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.40  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.24/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 4116 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------