↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL483+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.03s 0.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  16   ~;  12   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  16   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y),not(X)),implies(X,Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',modus_tollens) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',r3) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X,Y] : or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_or) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_implies_and) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_implies_or) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_tollens,conjecture,
    modus_tollens,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_tollens_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_modus_tollens]) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y),not(X)),implies(X,Y)))
      | modus_tollens )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1)))
      | ~ modus_tollens ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens]) ).

fof(sk_modus_tollens_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),not(sK1)),implies(sK1,sK0)))
      | modus_tollens )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X0)),implies(X0,X1)))
      | ~ modus_tollens ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X,sK1),skolemize(Y,sK0)],[nnf_3]) ).

fof(sk_modus_tollens,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),not(sK1)),implies(sK1,sK0)))
      | modus_tollens )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(VAR_0),not(VAR_1)),implies(VAR_1,VAR_0)))
        | ~ modus_tollens ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_modus_tollens_sk]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),not(sK1)),implies(sK1,sK0)))
    | modus_tollens ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_modus_tollens]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[r3]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    ( or(A,B) = not(and(not(A),not(B)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_or]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B)
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    ( not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and]) ).

cnf(c_93,plain,
    ( or(not(A),B) = implies(A,B)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or]) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('theBenchmark.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

fof(principia_r3,axiom,
    r3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',principia_r3) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    r3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[principia_r3]) ).

fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

cnf(c_106,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

cnf(c_107,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

cnf(c_108,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_tollens_neg]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    or(not(A),B) = implies(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_93]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_82]) ).

cnf(c_119,plain,
    not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_120,plain,
    not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_92]) ).

cnf(c_121,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sK0),not(sK1)),implies(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_181,plain,
    implies(not(A),B) = or(A,B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_120,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_129,plain,
    or(A,B) = implies(not(A),B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_181]) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,not(B)),implies(B,A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_115]) ).

cnf(c_182,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK0,not(sK1)),implies(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_121]) ).

cnf(c_180,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_182]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL483+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.31  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:38:35 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.31  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.03/0.31  % Process 3236975 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.03/0.31  % Fri Sep 25 22:38:35 2026
% 0.03/0.31  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.03/0.32  
% 0.03/0.32  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.03/0.33  % Length of proof is 25.
% 0.03/0.33  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.03/0.33  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.03/0.33  % Given clauses 61.
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------