↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL483+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:07:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.62s
% Output   : Refutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    r3,
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ~ modus_tollens,
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( ~ r3
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(or__dfg(u,v),or__dfg(v,u))) ),
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ op_implies_or
    | equal(or__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),implies__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    ( ~ op_implies_and
    | equal(not__dfg(and__dfg(u,not__dfg(v))),implies__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(55,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(skc59),not__dfg(skc60)),implies__dfg(skc60,skc59)))
    | modus_tollens ),
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(58,axiom,
    ( ~ op_or
    | equal(not__dfg(and__dfg(not__dfg(u),not__dfg(v))),or__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('LCL483+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(78,plain,
    equal(or__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),implies__dfg(u,v)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[51,4]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:51.0,4.0')] ).

cnf(79,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(or__dfg(u,v),or__dfg(v,u))),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[49,10]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:49.0,10.0')] ).

cnf(81,plain,
    equal(not__dfg(and__dfg(u,not__dfg(v))),implies__dfg(u,v)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[52,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:52.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(84,plain,
    ( ~ op_or
    | equal(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),or__dfg(u,v)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[81,58]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:81.0,58.1')] ).

cnf(85,plain,
    equal(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),or__dfg(u,v)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[84,1]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:84.0,1.0')] ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(or__dfg(skc59,not__dfg(skc60)),implies__dfg(skc60,skc59)))
    | modus_tollens ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[85,55]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:85.0,55.0')] ).

cnf(92,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(or__dfg(skc59,not__dfg(skc60)),implies__dfg(skc60,skc59))),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[91,14]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:91.1,14.0')] ).

cnf(135,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(or__dfg(u,not__dfg(v)),implies__dfg(v,u))),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[78,79]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:78.0,79.0')] ).

cnf(137,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[135,92]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:135.0,92.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL483+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.43  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 10:29:36 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.62  
% 0.24/0.62  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.24/0.62  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.24/0.62  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.62  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.24/0.62  SPASS derived 37 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 83 clauses.
% 0.24/0.62  SPASS allocated 97856 KBytes.
% 0.24/0.62  SPASS spent	0:00:00.17 on the problem.
% 0.24/0.62  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.24/0.62  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.24/0.62  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.24/0.62  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.24/0.62  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.24/0.62  
% 0.24/0.62  
% 0.24/0.62  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 19 :
% 0.24/0.62  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.62  Formulae used in the proof : hilbert_op_or hilbert_op_implies_and principia_op_implies_or principia_r3 hilbert_modus_tollens r3 op_implies_or op_implies_and modus_tollens op_or
% 0.24/0.62  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------