↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : LCL484+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:36:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 9.46s 9.72s
% Output   : Proof 9.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : LCL484+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  5 09:43:31 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 9.46/9.72  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 9.46/9.72  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Iff implies_1 (∀ (X Y : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies X (implies Y X)))) True
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #22 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Iff r2 (∀ (P Q : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Q (or P Q)))) True
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #29 (by assumption #[]): Eq (op_implies_or → ∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq (implies X Y) (or (not X) Y)) True
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #31 (by assumption #[]): Eq op_implies_or True
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #36 (by assumption #[]): Eq r2 True
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #43 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not implies_1) True
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #64 (by clausification #[43]): Eq implies_1 False
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #98 (by clausification #[3]): Or (Eq implies_1 True) (Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies X (implies Y X))) False)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #100 (by clausification #[98]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 9.46/9.72    Or (Eq implies_1 True) (Eq (Not (∀ (Y : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 8 a) (implies Y (skS.0 8 a))))) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #101 (by clausification #[100]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 9.46/9.72    Or (Eq implies_1 True) (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 8 a) (implies Y (skS.0 8 a)))) False)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #102 (by clausification #[101]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 9.46/9.72    Or (Eq implies_1 True) (Eq (Not (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 8 a) (implies (skS.0 9 a a_1) (skS.0 8 a))))) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #103 (by clausification #[102]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 9.46/9.72    Or (Eq implies_1 True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 8 a) (implies (skS.0 9 a a_1) (skS.0 8 a)))) False)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #104 (by forward demodulation #[103, 64]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 9.46/9.72    Or (Eq False True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 8 a) (implies (skS.0 9 a a_1) (skS.0 8 a)))) False)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #105 (by clausification #[104]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 8 a) (implies (skS.0 9 a a_1) (skS.0 8 a)))) False
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #123 (by clausification #[22]): Or (Eq r2 False) (Eq (∀ (P Q : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Q (or P Q))) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #135 (by clausification #[123]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq r2 False) (Eq (∀ (Q : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Q (or a Q))) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #136 (by clausification #[135]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq r2 False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a (or a_1 a))) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #137 (by forward demodulation #[136, 36]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a (or a_1 a))) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #138 (by clausification #[137]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a (or a_1 a))) True
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #224 (by clausification #[29]): Or (Eq op_implies_or False) (Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq (implies X Y) (or (not X) Y)) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #225 (by clausification #[224]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq op_implies_or False) (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (implies a Y) (or (not a) Y)) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #226 (by clausification #[225]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq op_implies_or False) (Eq (Eq (implies a a_1) (or (not a) a_1)) True)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #227 (by clausification #[226]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq op_implies_or False) (Eq (implies a a_1) (or (not a) a_1))
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #228 (by forward demodulation #[227, 31]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (implies a a_1) (or (not a) a_1))
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #229 (by clausification #[228]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (implies a a_1) (or (not a) a_1)
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #231 (by superposition #[229, 138]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a (implies a_1 a))) True
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #238 (by superposition #[231, 105]): Eq True False
% 9.46/9.72  Clause #240 (by clausification #[238]): False
% 9.46/9.72  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------