↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LCL484+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  12   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   3 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(hilbert_implies_1,conjecture,
    implies_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',hilbert_implies_1) ).

fof(r2,axiom,
    ( r2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(X5,or(X4,X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r2) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

fof(implies_1,axiom,
    ( implies_1
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_1) ).

fof(principia_r2,axiom,
    r2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r2) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ implies_1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ r2
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X7,or(X6,X7))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0)))
        | r2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X3,X4) = or(not(X3),X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ implies_1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X4,X3))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk7_0,implies(esk8_0,esk7_0)))
        | implies_1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ implies_1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    r2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( implies_1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk7_0,implies(esk8_0,esk7_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ implies_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk7_0,implies(esk8_0,esk7_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL484+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 08:23:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.009 s
% 0.25/1.42  
% 0.25/1.42  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.25/1.42  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.25/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 45
% 0.25/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 43
% 0.25/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.25/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.25/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.25/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.25/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 485
% 0.25/1.42  
% 0.25/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.25/1.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.25/1.42  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.25/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 2732 pages
% 0.25/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.25/1.42  
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 0.25/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 45
% 0.25/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 74
% 0.25/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 74
% 0.25/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 102
% 0.25/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 11
% 0.25/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.25/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 89
% 0.25/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.25/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 144
% 0.25/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 120
% 0.25/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 144
% 0.25/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 81
% 0.25/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 0.25/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.25/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 53
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 90
% 0.25/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 175
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.25/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 478
% 0.25/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 477
% 0.25/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.25/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 123
% 0.25/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 36
% 0.25/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 0.25/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5694
% 0.25/1.42  
% 0.25/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.25/1.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.42  # Total time               : 0.024 s
% 0.25/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3324 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------