↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL484+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  12   ~;   9   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   3 sgn  12   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(implies_1,axiom,
    ( implies_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_1) ).

fof(r2,axiom,
    ( r2
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',r2) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_implies_or) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_1,conjecture,
    implies_1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_1) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ implies_1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).

fof(nnf_4,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X)))
      | implies_1 )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0)))
      | ~ implies_1 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_1]) ).

fof(sk_implies_1_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0)))
      | implies_1 )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0)))
      | ~ implies_1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK1)],[nnf_4]) ).

fof(sk_implies_1,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0)))
      | implies_1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,implies(VAR_1,VAR_0)))
        | ~ implies_1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_implies_1_sk]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0)))
    | implies_1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_implies_1]) ).

cnf(c_80,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,or(B,A)))
    | ~ r2 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[r2]) ).

cnf(c_93,plain,
    ( or(not(A),B) = implies(A,B)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or]) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('theBenchmark.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

fof(principia_r2,axiom,
    r2,
    file('theBenchmark.p',principia_r2) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    r2,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[principia_r2]) ).

cnf(c_108,negated_conjecture,
    ~ implies_1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    or(not(A),B) = implies(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_93]) ).

cnf(c_114,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,or(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_80]) ).

cnf(c_121,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_130,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_114]) ).

cnf(c_131,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_121]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL484+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:36:38 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 2096382 was started by sandbox2 on n007,
% 0.09/0.37  % Fri Sep 25 22:36:38 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.39  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.09/0.39  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.09/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 0.09/0.39  % Given clauses 53.
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------