↑ Up

CSI_E---1.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem  : LCL490+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:21:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.61s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : LCL490+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  5 13:37:31 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.43  start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.61  % Version  : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.37/0.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.61  % Proof found!
% 0.37/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.37/0.61  fof(modus_ponens, axiom, (modus_ponens<=>![X1, X2]:((is_a_theorem(X1)&is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)))=>is_a_theorem(X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', modus_ponens)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(r5, axiom, (r5<=>![X4, X5, X6]:is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(or(X4,X5),or(X4,X6))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', r5)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(principia_modus_ponens, axiom, modus_ponens, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax', principia_modus_ponens)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(principia_r5, axiom, r5, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax', principia_r5)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(op_implies_or, axiom, (op_implies_or=>![X1, X2]:implies(X1,X2)=or(not(X1),X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax', op_implies_or)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(principia_op_implies_or, axiom, op_implies_or, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax', principia_op_implies_or)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(r2, axiom, (r2<=>![X4, X5]:is_a_theorem(implies(X5,or(X4,X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', r2)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(principia_r2, axiom, r2, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax', principia_r2)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(r3, axiom, (r3<=>![X4, X5]:is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X5),or(X5,X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', r3)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(or_1, axiom, (or_1<=>![X1, X2]:is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', or_1)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(hilbert_or_1, conjecture, or_1, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', hilbert_or_1)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(principia_r3, axiom, r3, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax', principia_r3)).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(c_0_12, plain, ![X72, X73]:((~modus_ponens|(~is_a_theorem(X72)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X72,X73))|is_a_theorem(X73)))&(((is_a_theorem(esk1_0)|modus_ponens)&(is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0))|modus_ponens))&(~is_a_theorem(esk2_0)|modus_ponens))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X176, X177, X178]:((~r5|is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X177,X178),implies(or(X176,X177),or(X176,X178)))))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk54_0,esk55_0),implies(or(esk53_0,esk54_0),or(esk53_0,esk55_0))))|r5)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r5])])])])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_14, plain, (is_a_theorem(X2)|~modus_ponens|~is_a_theorem(X1)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_15, plain, (modus_ponens), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_modus_ponens])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_16, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2))))|~r5), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_17, plain, (r5), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r5])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_18, plain, (is_a_theorem(X1)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))|~is_a_theorem(X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_19, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])])).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(c_0_20, plain, ![X188, X189]:(~op_implies_or|implies(X188,X189)=or(not(X188),X189)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_21, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X1,X3)))|~is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_22, plain, (implies(X1,X2)=or(not(X1),X2)|~op_implies_or), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_23, plain, (op_implies_or), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or])).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(c_0_24, plain, ![X162, X163]:((~r2|is_a_theorem(implies(X163,or(X162,X163))))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0)))|r2)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r2])])])])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_25, plain, (is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))|~is_a_theorem(or(X1,X3))|~is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_21])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_26, plain, (or(not(X1),X2)=implies(X1,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_27, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))|~r2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_28, plain, (r2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r2])).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(c_0_29, plain, ![X166, X167]:((~r3|is_a_theorem(implies(or(X166,X167),or(X167,X166))))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0)))|r3)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3])])])])).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(c_0_30, plain, ![X110, X111]:((~or_1|is_a_theorem(implies(X110,or(X110,X111))))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(esk20_0,or(esk20_0,esk21_0)))|or_1)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[or_1])])])])).
% 0.37/0.61  fof(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ~or_1, inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_or_1])])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_32, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))|~is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))|~is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_26])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_33, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_34, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))|~r3), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_35, plain, (r3), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r3])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_36, plain, (or_1|~is_a_theorem(implies(esk20_0,or(esk20_0,esk21_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, (~or_1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_38, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))|~is_a_theorem(implies(or(X3,X1),X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_39, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35])])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_40, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(esk20_0,or(esk20_0,esk21_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_37])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_41, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_39])).
% 0.37/0.61  cnf(c_0_42, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_41])]), ['proof']).
% 0.37/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.37/0.61  % User time                : 0.155 s
% 0.37/0.61  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.37/0.61  % Total time               : 0.163 s
% 0.37/0.61  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------