%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LCL491+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:44:52 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 10.79s 2.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_48,plain,
( or_2
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk39_0,or(esk38_0,esk39_0))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hx340ikw/input.p',i_0_48) ).
cnf(i_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ or_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hx340ikw/input.p',i_0_22) ).
cnf(i_0_64,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
| ~ r2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hx340ikw/input.p',i_0_64) ).
cnf(i_0_57,plain,
r2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hx340ikw/input.p',i_0_57) ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( or_2
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk39_0,or(esk38_0,esk39_0))) ),
i_0_48 ).
cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
~ or_2,
i_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
| ~ r2 ),
i_0_64 ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
r2,
i_0_57 ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk39_0,or(esk38_0,esk39_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72])]) ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LCL491+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.07/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.33 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.33 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Sep 4 14:11:41 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.11/0.43 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.11/0.43 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.11/0.43 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.79/2.84 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 10.79/2.84 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 10.79/2.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 10.79/2.84
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof found!
% 10.79/2.84 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.79/2.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object total steps : 11
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 10.79/2.84 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.79/2.84 # Parsed axioms : 74
% 10.79/2.84 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Initial clauses : 74
% 10.79/2.84 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Initial clauses in saturation : 74
% 10.79/2.84 # Processed clauses : 34
% 10.79/2.84 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 10.79/2.84 # ...subsumed : 1
% 10.79/2.84 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 10.79/2.84 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 10.79/2.84 # Generated clauses : 4
% 10.79/2.84 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2
% 10.79/2.84 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Paramodulations : 4
% 10.79/2.84 # Factorizations : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 10.79/2.84 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 10.79/2.84 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 10.79/2.84 # Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 10.79/2.84 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42
% 10.79/2.84 # ...number of literals in the above : 85
% 10.79/2.84 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 10.79/2.84 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 10.79/2.84 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 10.79/2.84 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 10.79/2.84 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 10.79/2.84 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 10.79/2.84 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Condensation successes : 0
% 10.79/2.84 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1319
% 10.79/2.84
% 10.79/2.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.79/2.84 # User time : 0.010 s
% 10.79/2.84 # System time : 0.000 s
% 10.79/2.84 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 10.79/2.84 # ...preprocessing : 0.009 s
% 10.79/2.84 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 10.79/2.84 # Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 10.79/2.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------