↑ Up

Drodi---4.1.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi---4.1.1
% Problem  : LCL493+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:07:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.65s 1.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   88 (  44 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  173 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  143 (  58   ~;  55   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  11 usr;  11 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;  11 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  150 ( 137   !;  13   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ( equivalence_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(X,Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f23,axiom,
    ( r2
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ( r5
  <=> ! [P,Q,R] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Q,R),implies(or(P,Q),or(P,R)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X,Y] : or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X,Y] : and(X,Y) = not(or(not(X),not(Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f31,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X,Y] : equiv(X,Y) = and(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f37,axiom,
    r2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    r5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f45,conjecture,
    equivalence_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f45]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( is_a_theorem(Y)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X) ) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] :
          ( ~ is_a_theorem(Y)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
      | modus_ponens )
    & ( ! [X,Y] :
          ( is_a_theorem(Y)
          | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X) )
      | ~ modus_ponens ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f47]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( ( ? [Y] :
          ( ~ is_a_theorem(Y)
          & ? [X] :
              ( is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
              & is_a_theorem(X) ) )
      | modus_ponens )
    & ( ! [Y] :
          ( is_a_theorem(Y)
          | ! [X] :
              ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
              | ~ is_a_theorem(X) ) )
      | ~ modus_ponens ) ),
    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f48]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(sK0_skl)
        & is_a_theorem(implies(sK1_skl,sK0_skl))
        & is_a_theorem(sK1_skl) )
      | modus_ponens )
    & ( ! [Y] :
          ( is_a_theorem(Y)
          | ! [X] :
              ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
              | ~ is_a_theorem(X) ) )
      | ~ modus_ponens ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0_skl,sK1_skl]),skolemize(Y,sK0_skl),skolemize(X,sK1_skl)],[f49]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f50]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(X,Y)))
      | equivalence_1 )
    & ( ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(X,Y)))
      | ~ equivalence_1 ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(sK26_skl,sK27_skl),implies(sK26_skl,sK27_skl)))
      | equivalence_1 )
    & ( ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(X,Y)))
      | ~ equivalence_1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK26_skl,sK27_skl]),skolemize(X,sK26_skl),skolemize(Y,sK27_skl)],[f101]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(sK26_skl,sK27_skl),implies(sK26_skl,sK27_skl)))
    | equivalence_1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f102]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ( ( ? [P,Q] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q)))
      | r2 )
    & ( ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q)))
      | ~ r2 ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK46_skl,or(sK45_skl,sK46_skl)))
      | r2 )
    & ( ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q)))
      | ~ r2 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK45_skl,sK46_skl]),skolemize(P,sK45_skl),skolemize(Q,sK46_skl)],[f141]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X1,X0)))
      | ~ r2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f142]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ( ( ? [P,Q] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P)))
      | r3 )
    & ( ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P)))
      | ~ r3 ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(sK47_skl,sK48_skl),or(sK48_skl,sK47_skl)))
      | r3 )
    & ( ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P)))
      | ~ r3 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK47_skl,sK48_skl]),skolemize(P,sK47_skl),skolemize(Q,sK48_skl)],[f145]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
      | ~ r3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f146]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ( ( ? [P,Q,R] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Q,R),implies(or(P,Q),or(P,R))))
      | r5 )
    & ( ! [P,Q,R] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Q,R),implies(or(P,Q),or(P,R))))
      | ~ r5 ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).

fof(f154,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK53_skl,sK54_skl),implies(or(sK52_skl,sK53_skl),or(sK52_skl,sK54_skl))))
      | r5 )
    & ( ! [P,Q,R] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Q,R),implies(or(P,Q),or(P,R))))
      | ~ r5 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK52_skl,sK53_skl,sK54_skl]),skolemize(P,sK52_skl),skolemize(Q,sK53_skl),skolemize(R,sK54_skl)],[f153]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1))))
      | ~ r5 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f154]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] : or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1)))
      | ~ op_or ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f157]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] : and(X,Y) = not(or(not(X),not(Y)))
    | ~ op_and ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1)))
      | ~ op_and ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f159]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1)))
      | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f161]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

fof(f164,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1)
      | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f163]) ).

fof(f165,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] : equiv(X,Y) = and(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,X))
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( equiv(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f165]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f33]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f34]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f35]) ).

fof(f172,plain,
    r2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f37]) ).

fof(f173,plain,
    r3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f38]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    r5,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f42]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f43]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f46]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f51,f170]) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f143,f172]) ).

fof(f189,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f164,f167]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f189,f185]) ).

fof(f228,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f147,f173]) ).

fof(f229,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(or(X1,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f228,f181]) ).

fof(f237,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(or(X1,not(X0)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f189,f229]) ).

fof(f252,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f162,f178]) ).

fof(f274,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(or(X0,X1),not(or(X1,X0)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f237,f228]) ).

fof(f451,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(sK26_skl,sK27_skl),implies(sK26_skl,sK27_skl))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f104,f180]) ).

fof(f619,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( or(X0,X1) = implies(not(X0),X1)
      | ~ op_or ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f252,f158]) ).

fof(f628,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = implies(not(X0),X1),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f619,f177]) ).

fof(f662,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(X0,implies(X1,not(X0)))),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f628,f190]) ).

fof(f710,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(implies(X0,not(X1)),X1)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f662,f229]) ).

fof(f935,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f155,f175]) ).

fof(f937,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f935,f181]) ).

fof(f1033,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( and(X0,X1) = not(implies(X0,not(X1)))
      | ~ op_and ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f189,f160]) ).

fof(f1037,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(implies(X0,not(X1))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f1033,f168]) ).

fof(f1038,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : and(not(X0),X1) = not(or(X0,not(X1))),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f628,f1037]) ).

fof(f1056,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : or(implies(X0,not(X1)),X2) = implies(and(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f1037,f628]) ).

fof(f1314,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : equiv(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f166,f169]) ).

fof(f1950,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(or(not(X0),X1),and(not(X1),X0))),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f1038,f274]) ).

fof(f2003,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(implies(X0,X1),and(not(X1),X0))),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f189,f1950]) ).

fof(f2941,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X1)),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f1056,f710]) ).

fof(f3170,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,and(X1,X2)),or(X0,X2))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f2941,f937]) ).

fof(f16081,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( is_a_theorem(or(X0,X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X0,and(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f3170,f181]) ).

fof(f36459,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(implies(X0,X1),X0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f16081,f2003]) ).

fof(f36526,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f1056,f36459]) ).

fof(f36705,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X0,X1),implies(X0,X1))),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f1314,f36526]) ).

fof(f40384,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f451,f36705]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL493+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:31:12 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.40  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 8.65/1.79  % Refutation found
% 8.65/1.79  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 8.65/1.79  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 4.37/1.87  % Elapsed time: 1.471703 seconds
% 4.37/1.87  % CPU time: 11.197987 seconds
% 4.37/1.87  % Total memory used: 281.280 MB
% 4.37/1.87  % Net memory used: 269.784 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------