↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL494+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:52:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.75s 1.30s
% Output   : Refutation 3.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   28
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  113 (  39 unt;  14 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  231 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  213 (  95   ~;  89   |;   2   &)
%                                         (  18 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   24 (  22 usr;  22 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (   0 sgn  90   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X0)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ( equivalence_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equivalence_2) ).

fof(f23,axiom,
    ( r2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r2) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r3) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_implies_and) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_implies_or) ).

fof(f31,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X0,X1] : equiv(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_equiv) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_equiv) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_modus_ponens) ).

fof(f37,axiom,
    r2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_r2) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_r3) ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(f45,conjecture,
    equivalence_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_equivalence_2) ).

fof(f46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_2,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f45]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ~ equivalence_2,
    inference(flattening,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ( r3
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ( r2
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0)))
   => equivalence_2 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
   => ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X0)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ( equivalence_2
    | ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1)))
    | ~ r2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : equiv(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0))
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ( equivalence_2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(sK0,sK1),implies(sK1,sK0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f59]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ( equivalence_2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(sK0,sK1),implies(sK1,sK0))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1)))
      | ~ r2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
      | ~ r3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1)))
      | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1)
      | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( equiv(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0))
      | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    r2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    r3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ~ equivalence_2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f99,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> op_equiv ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f103,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : equiv(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : equiv(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0))
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f103]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f83,f103,f99]) ).

fof(f107,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> op_implies_or ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f111,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1)
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f82,f111,f107]) ).

fof(f115,definition,
    ( spl2_5
  <=> op_implies_and ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f119,definition,
    ( spl2_6
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1)))
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f119]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_5
    | spl2_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f81,f119,f115]) ).

fof(f155,definition,
    ( spl2_15
  <=> r3 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_15])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f159,definition,
    ( spl2_16
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_16])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
    | ~ spl2_16 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f159]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_15
    | spl2_16 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f76,f159,f155]) ).

fof(f163,definition,
    ( spl2_17
  <=> r2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_17])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f167,definition,
    ( spl2_18
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_18])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl2_18 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f167]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_17
    | spl2_18 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f75,f167,f163]) ).

fof(f179,definition,
    ( spl2_21
  <=> is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(sK0,sK1),implies(sK1,sK0))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_21])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(sK0,sK1),implies(sK1,sK0)))
    | spl2_21 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f179]) ).

fof(f183,definition,
    ( spl2_22
  <=> equivalence_2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_22])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_21
    | spl2_22 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f73,f183,f179]) ).

fof(f196,definition,
    ( spl2_25
  <=> modus_ponens ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_25])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f200,definition,
    ( spl2_26
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_26])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ spl2_26 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f200]) ).

fof(f202,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_25
    | spl2_26 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f71,f200,f196]) ).

fof(f203,plain,
    ~ spl2_22,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f97,f183]) ).

fof(f206,plain,
    spl2_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f84,f107]) ).

fof(f209,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f86,f99]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    spl2_25,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f87,f196]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    spl2_17,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f89,f163]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    spl2_15,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f90,f155]) ).

fof(f233,plain,
    spl2_5,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f95,f115]) ).

fof(f234,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_18 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f168,f112]) ).

fof(f241,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X0)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_16 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f160,f112]) ).

fof(f242,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(equiv(sK0,sK1),implies(sK1,sK0))))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | spl2_21
    | ~ spl2_26 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f201,f181]) ).

fof(f247,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X0,X1] : implies(X2,and(X0,not(X1))) = not(and(X2,implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f120,f120]) ).

fof(f248,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X0,X1] : implies(and(X0,not(X1)),X2) = or(implies(X0,X1),X2)
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f112,f120]) ).

fof(f294,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(implies(sK1,sK0),not(equiv(sK0,sK1))))
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_16
    | spl2_21
    | ~ spl2_26 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f242,f241]) ).

fof(f307,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(implies(X0,X1),implies(X2,and(X0,not(X1)))))
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_6
    | ~ spl2_18 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f234,f248]) ).

fof(f377,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : implies(implies(X0,X1),and(X1,not(X0))) = not(equiv(X0,X1))
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f247,f104]) ).

fof(f1045,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(or(implies(X1,X0),not(equiv(X0,X1))))
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_6
    | ~ spl2_18 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f307,f377]) ).

fof(f1092,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_6
    | ~ spl2_16
    | ~ spl2_18
    | spl2_21
    | ~ spl2_26 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1045,f294]) ).

fof(f1098,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_6
    | ~ spl2_16
    | ~ spl2_18
    | spl2_21
    | ~ spl2_26 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1092]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f105]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f113]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_5
    | spl2_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f121]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_15
    | spl2_16 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f161]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_17
    | spl2_18 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f169]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_21
    | spl2_22 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f186]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_25
    | spl2_26 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f202]) ).

cnf(s14,plain,
    ~ spl2_22,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f203]) ).

cnf(s16,plain,
    spl2_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f206]) ).

cnf(s18,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f209]) ).

cnf(s20,plain,
    spl2_25,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f212]) ).

cnf(s24,plain,
    spl2_17,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f218]) ).

cnf(s26,plain,
    spl2_15,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f221]) ).

cnf(s34,plain,
    spl2_5,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f233]) ).

cnf(s39,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_6
    | ~ spl2_16
    | ~ spl2_18
    | spl2_21
    | ~ spl2_26 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f1098]) ).

cnf(s40,plain,
    spl2_26,
    inference(rat,[],[s13,s20]) ).

cnf(s42,plain,
    ~ spl2_21,
    inference(rat,[],[s11,s14]) ).

cnf(s44,plain,
    spl2_18,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s24]) ).

cnf(s45,plain,
    spl2_16,
    inference(rat,[],[s8,s26]) ).

cnf(s50,plain,
    spl2_6,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s34]) ).

cnf(s51,plain,
    spl2_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s16]) ).

cnf(s52,plain,
    ~ spl2_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s39,s40,s42,s44,s45,s50,s51]) ).

cnf(s53,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s52,s18]) ).

fof(f1100,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s53]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL494+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.39  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:50:41 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.40  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130131)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130136)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=2846431980:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=1038385397:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=3372965743:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=3147595589:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130137)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=700547627:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130138)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=1177678244:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)Peak memory usage: 86 MB
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)Peak memory usage: 86 MB
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130141)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=2855641117:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130141)First to succeed.
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130141)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3130131"
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130142)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130139)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130140)------------------------------
% 2.75/1.30  % (3130141)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.75/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.75/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)------------------------------
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)Time elapsed: 0.028 s
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)Peak memory usage: 90 MB
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)Instructions burned: 37 (million)
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)------------------------------
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130141)------------------------------
% 3.48/1.39  % (3130131)Success in time 0.425 s
% 3.48/1.39  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------