↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : LCL495+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:54:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 87.53s 26.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 87.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   68 (  37 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  105 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  31   ~;  26   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;  10 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  106 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(hilbert_op_equiv,axiom,
    'op$uequiv' ).

fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( 'modus$uponens'
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1))
          & 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) )
       => 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1) ) ) ).

fof(and_3,axiom,
    ( 'and$u3'
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ) ).

fof(equivalence_3,axiom,
    ( 'equivalence$u3'
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1)))) ) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))) ) ).

fof(r4,axiom,
    ( r4
  <=> ! [X0,X1,X2] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))) ) ).

fof(r5,axiom,
    ( r5
  <=> ! [X0,X1,X2] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X0,X1),or(X0,X2)))) ) ).

fof(op_and,axiom,
    ( 'op$uand'
   => ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))) ) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( 'op$uimplies$uor'
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ) ).

fof(op_equiv,axiom,
    ( 'op$uequiv'
   => ! [X0,X1] : equiv(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0)) ) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    'op$uimplies$uor' ).

fof(principia_op_and,axiom,
    'op$uand' ).

fof(principia_modus_ponens,axiom,
    'modus$uponens' ).

fof(principia_r3,axiom,
    r3 ).

fof(principia_r4,axiom,
    r4 ).

fof(principia_r5,axiom,
    r5 ).

fof(hilbert_equivalence_3,conjecture,
    'equivalence$u3' ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ 'equivalence$u3',
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[hilbert_equivalence_3]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    'op$uequiv',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[hilbert_op_equiv]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1)
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0)
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ 'modus$uponens' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c22,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ 'and$u3' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[and_3]) ).

cnf(c23,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(sK36,implies(sK37,and(sK36,sK37))))
    | 'and$u3' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[and_3]) ).

cnf(c35,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(sK62,sK63),implies(implies(sK63,sK62),equiv(sK62,sK63))))
    | 'equivalence$u3' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[equivalence_3]) ).

cnf(c52,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[r3]) ).

cnf(c54,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2))))
    | ~ r4 ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[r4]) ).

cnf(c56,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1))))
    | ~ r5 ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[r5]) ).

cnf(c59,plain,
    ( not(or(not(X0),not(X1))) = and(X0,X1)
    | ~ 'op$uand' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[op_and]) ).

cnf(c61,plain,
    ( or(not(X0),X1) = implies(X0,X1)
    | ~ 'op$uimplies$uor' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[op_implies_or]) ).

cnf(c62,plain,
    ( and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0)) = equiv(X0,X1)
    | ~ 'op$uequiv' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[op_equiv]) ).

cnf(c63,plain,
    'op$uimplies$uor',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

cnf(c64,plain,
    'op$uand',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_op_and]) ).

cnf(c66,plain,
    'modus$uponens',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c69,plain,
    r3,
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_r3]) ).

cnf(c70,plain,
    r4,
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_r4]) ).

cnf(c71,plain,
    r5,
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_r5]) ).

cnf(c73,plain,
    ~ 'equivalence$u3',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(sK62,sK63),implies(implies(sK63,sK62),equiv(sK62,sK63)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c73,c35]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0)) = equiv(X0,X1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2,c62]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    ( ~ 'and$u3'
    | 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),equiv(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d1,c22]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    ~ 'and$u3',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d2,d0]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(sK36,implies(sK37,and(sK36,sK37)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,c23]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    or(not(X0),X1) = implies(X0,X1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c63,c61]) ).

cnf(d6,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X1,X0))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1)
    | 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c66,c3]) ).

cnf(d7,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c70,c54]) ).

cnf(d8,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X1,or(X0,X2)))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X0,or(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d7,d6]) ).

cnf(d9,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X1,or(not(X0),X2)))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,or(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d5,d8]) ).

cnf(d10,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X2,implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,or(X2,X1))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[d9,d5]) ).

cnf(d11,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(not(X0),implies(X2,X1)))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X2,implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d5,d10]) ).

cnf(d12,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X1,implies(X0,X2))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[d11,d5]) ).

cnf(d13,plain,
    ( ~ 'op$uand'
    | not(implies(X0,not(X1))) = and(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c59,d5]) ).

cnf(d14,plain,
    not(implies(X0,not(X1))) = and(X0,X1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c64,d13]) ).

cnf(d15,plain,
    or(and(X0,X1),X2) = implies(implies(X0,not(X1)),X2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d14,d5]) ).

cnf(d16,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c69,c52]) ).

cnf(d17,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X1,not(X0)),implies(X0,X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d5,d16]) ).

cnf(d18,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(X0,not(X1)),implies(X1,not(X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d5,d17]) ).

cnf(d19,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(or(and(X0,X1),implies(X1,not(X0)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[d18,d15]) ).

cnf(d20,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c71,c56]) ).

cnf(d21,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d20,d6]) ).

cnf(d22,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X2,X1))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X2,X0))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d21,d6]) ).

cnf(d23,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(X0,X1),or(X1,not(X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d5,d16]) ).

cnf(d24,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X0,implies(implies(X1,X0),not(X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d10,d23]) ).

cnf(d25,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),not(X0)),X2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d24,d22]) ).

cnf(d26,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(and(implies(X0,X1),X0),X2)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[d25,d15]) ).

cnf(d27,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X0,implies(X1,not(implies(X1,X0))))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d26,d19]) ).

cnf(d28,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(or(not(X1),implies(X0,and(X0,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d14,d27]) ).

cnf(d29,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X1,X0)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[d28,d5]) ).

cnf(d30,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d29,d12]) ).

cnf(d31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d30,d4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL495+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.67  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.67  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.67  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.67  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.67  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.67  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.67  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.67  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:42:26 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.68  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.68  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 87.53/26.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 87.53/26.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------