↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL496+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 36.43s 11.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 36.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  29 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  101 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  35   ~;  30   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   95 (   0 sgn  92   !;   3   ?;  46   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
          & is_a_theorem(X0) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    ( cn1
  <=> ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn1) ).

fof(f25,axiom,
    ( r4
  <=> ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r4) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ( r5
  <=> ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X0,X1),or(X0,X2)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r5) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_modus_ponens) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    r4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r4) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    r5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r5) ).

fof(f45,conjecture,
    cn1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',luka_cn1) ).

fof(f46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f45]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(flattening,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ( r5
   => ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X0,X1),or(X0,X2)))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( r4
   => ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2))))
   => cn1 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
   => ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
          & is_a_theorem(X0) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2))))
    | cn1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( ~ r4
    | ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( ~ r5
    | ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X0,X1),or(X0,X2)))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( ~ op_implies_or
    | ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2))))
    | cn1 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f61]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ modus_ponens
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2))))
    | cn1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ r4
      | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ r5
      | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X0,X1),or(X0,X2)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    r4,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    r5,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ modus_ponens
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ( cn1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2))))
      | ~ r4 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1))))
      | ~ r5 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( or(not(X0),X1) = implies(X0,X1) )
      | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    r4,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    r5,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

tcf(c_73,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

tcf(c_93,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : or(not(X0),X1) = implies(X0,X1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_61,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_99,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_64,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_69,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_113,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_68,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_116,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2)))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_73,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_1242,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X2,X0),or(not(X2),X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_110]) ).

tcf(c_1323,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(not(X0),X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_1723,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,implies(X0,X2)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1323,c_93]) ).

tcf(c_1725,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),or(not(X1),implies(X0,X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_1723]) ).

tcf(c_5519,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X2,X1)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1242,c_93]) ).

tcf(c_5875,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,implies(X0,X2)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1725,c_93]) ).

tcf(c_5883,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X0,X2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5875,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_6585,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5519,c_5883]) ).

tcf(c_6598,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_6585]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL496+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/6.24  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/6.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/6.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/6.24  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/6.24  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/6.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/6.24  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/6.24  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 23:34:21 UTC 2026
% 0.14/6.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/6.25  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/6.29  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/6.29  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/6.30  
% 0.18/6.30  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.18/6.30  
% 0.18/6.30  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.18/6.31  % Proving...
% 36.43/11.71  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 36.43/11.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % ------  iProver source info
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 36.43/11.71  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 36.43/11.71  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Parsing...
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 13 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Proving...
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % 
% 36.43/11.71  % clauses                               12
% 36.43/11.71  % conjectures                           0
% 36.43/11.71  % EPR                                   0
% 36.43/11.71  % Horn                                  12
% 36.43/11.71  % unary                                 10
% 36.43/11.71  % binary                                1
% 36.43/11.71  % lits                                  15
% 36.43/11.71  % lits eq                               5
% 36.43/11.71  % fd_pure                               0
% 36.43/11.71  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 36.43/11.71  % fd_cond                               0
% 36.43/11.71  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 36.43/11.71  % AC symbols                            0
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ 
% 36.43/11.71  % Current options:
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ 
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % 
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % ------ Proving...
% 36.43/11.71  % 
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 36.43/11.71  
% 36.43/11.71  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------