↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : LCL499+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:54:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 21.62s 5.23s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 21.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  17   ~;  14   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( 'modus$uponens'
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1))
          & 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) )
       => 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1) ) ) ).

fof(kn1,axiom,
    ( kn1
  <=> ! [X0] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,and(X0,X0))) ) ).

fof(r1,axiom,
    ( r1
  <=> ! [X0] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)) ) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))) ) ).

fof(op_and,axiom,
    ( 'op$uand'
   => ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))) ) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( 'op$uimplies$uor'
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    'op$uimplies$uor' ).

fof(principia_op_and,axiom,
    'op$uand' ).

fof(principia_modus_ponens,axiom,
    'modus$uponens' ).

fof(principia_r1,axiom,
    r1 ).

fof(principia_r3,axiom,
    r3 ).

fof(rosser_kn1,conjecture,
    kn1 ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[rosser_kn1]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1)
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0)
    | ~ 'modus$uponens' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c37,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(sK65,and(sK65,sK65)))
    | kn1 ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[kn1]) ).

cnf(c48,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X0),X0))
    | ~ r1 ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[r1]) ).

cnf(c52,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[r3]) ).

cnf(c59,plain,
    ( and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1)))
    | ~ 'op$uand' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[op_and]) ).

cnf(c61,plain,
    ( implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1)
    | ~ 'op$uimplies$uor' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[op_implies_or]) ).

cnf(c63,plain,
    'op$uimplies$uor',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

cnf(c64,plain,
    'op$uand',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_op_and]) ).

cnf(c66,plain,
    'modus$uponens',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c67,plain,
    r1,
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_r1]) ).

cnf(c69,plain,
    r3,
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[principia_r3]) ).

cnf(c73,plain,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(sK65,and(sK65,sK65))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c73,c37]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c63,c61]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    ( ~ 'op$uand'
    | and(X0,X1) = not(implies(X0,not(X1))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c59,d1]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    and(X0,X1) = not(implies(X0,not(X1))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c64,d2]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c67,c48]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(implies(X0,not(X0)),not(X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d1,d4]) ).

cnf(d6,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X1,X0))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1)
    | 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c66,c3]) ).

cnf(d7,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c69,c52]) ).

cnf(d8,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X1,X0))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d7,d6]) ).

cnf(d9,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(or(X1,not(X0)))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d1,d8]) ).

cnf(d10,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X1,not(X0)))
    | 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,not(X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d1,d9]) ).

cnf(d11,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,not(implies(X0,not(X0))))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d10,d5]) ).

cnf(d12,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,and(X0,X0))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[d11,d3]) ).

cnf(d13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d12,d0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL499+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:42:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.62/5.23  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 21.62/5.23  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------