↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL512+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:44:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 13.68s 3.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  12   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(hilbert_equivalence_1,conjecture,
    equivalence_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_equivalence_1) ).

fof(kn2,axiom,
    ( kn2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X4,X5),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn2) ).

fof(op_equiv,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X1,X2] : equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_equiv) ).

fof(equivalence_1,axiom,
    ( equivalence_1
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',equivalence_1) ).

fof(rosser_kn2,axiom,
    kn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn2) ).

fof(rosser_op_equiv,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_op_equiv) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_equivalence_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] :
      ( ( ~ kn2
        | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X73,X74),X73)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk34_0,esk35_0),esk34_0))
        | kn2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X125,X126] :
      ( ~ op_equiv
      | equiv(X125,X126) = and(implies(X125,X126),implies(X126,X125)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_equiv])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X59,X60] :
      ( ( ~ equivalence_1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X59,X60),implies(X59,X60))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0)))
        | equivalence_1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equivalence_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
    | ~ kn2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    kn2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_equiv]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( equivalence_1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL512+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 17:13:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.41  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.10/0.42  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.10/0.42  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.10/0.42  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 13.68/3.88  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 13.68/3.88  # No SInE strategy applied
% 13.68/3.88  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 13.68/3.88  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 13.68/3.88  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 13.68/3.88  #
% 13.68/3.88  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 13.68/3.88  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.68/3.88  
% 13.68/3.88  # Proof found!
% 13.68/3.88  # SZS status Theorem
% 13.68/3.88  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.68/3.88  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.68/3.88  
% 13.68/3.88  # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.68/3.88  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 13.68/3.88  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 13.68/3.88  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 13.68/3.88  # Maximum resident set size: 3584 pages
% 13.68/3.88  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------