↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL519+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :   22
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  108 (  49 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  196 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  155 (  67   ~;  65   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  12 usr;  12 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  169 (  14 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(op_and,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_and) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(rosser_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_op_implies_and) ).

fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
          & is_a_theorem(X1) )
       => is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

fof(kn2,axiom,
    ( kn2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X4,X5),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn2) ).

fof(principia_op_and,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_and) ).

fof(rosser_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_op_or) ).

fof(rosser_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_modus_ponens) ).

fof(rosser_kn2,axiom,
    kn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn2) ).

fof(kn1,axiom,
    ( kn1
  <=> ! [X4] : is_a_theorem(implies(X4,and(X4,X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn1) ).

fof(rosser_kn1,axiom,
    kn1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn1) ).

fof(op_equiv,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X1,X2] : equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_equiv) ).

fof(rosser_op_equiv,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_op_equiv) ).

fof(kn3,axiom,
    ( kn3
  <=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(not(and(X5,X6)),not(and(X6,X4))))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn3) ).

fof(substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
    ( substitution_of_equivalents
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
       => X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',substitution_of_equivalents) ).

fof(rosser_kn3,axiom,
    kn3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn3) ).

fof(use_substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',use_substitution_of_equivalents) ).

fof(principia_r2,conjecture,
    r2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_r2) ).

fof(r2,axiom,
    ( r2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(X5,or(X4,X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r2) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X123,X124] :
      ( implies(X123,X124) = or(not(X123),X124)
      | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X121,X122] :
      ( implies(X121,X122) = not(and(X121,not(X122)))
      | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X119,X120] :
      ( and(X119,X120) = not(or(not(X119),not(X120)))
      | ~ op_and ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_and])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ op_implies_or
    | implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X117,X118] :
      ( or(X117,X118) = not(and(not(X117),not(X118)))
      | ~ op_or ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ op_implies_and
    | implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( modus_ponens
        | ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0) )
      & ( modus_ponens
        | is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0)) )
      & ( modus_ponens
        | is_a_theorem(esk1_0) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(X8)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X7,X8))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X7)
        | ~ modus_ponens ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] :
      ( ( kn2
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk34_0,esk35_0),esk34_0)) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X73,X74),X73))
        | ~ kn2 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn2])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ op_and
    | and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_and]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ op_or
    | or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ kn2
    | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    kn2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    not(implies(X1,not(X2))) = and(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]) ).

fof(c_0_44,plain,
    ! [X71] :
      ( ( kn1
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk33_0,and(esk33_0,esk33_0))) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(X71,and(X71,X71)))
        | ~ kn1 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    not(or(X1,not(X2))) = and(not(X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ kn1
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    kn1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn1]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    and(not(not(X1)),X2) = and(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_33]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49])]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(not(not(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | is_a_theorem(and(X1,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_52]) ).

fof(c_0_55,plain,
    ! [X125,X126] :
      ( equiv(X125,X126) = and(implies(X125,X126),implies(X126,X125))
      | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_equiv])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | is_a_theorem(not(not(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( ~ op_equiv
    | equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_equiv]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    or(and(X1,X2),X3) = implies(implies(X1,not(X2)),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_42]) ).

fof(c_0_60,plain,
    ! [X77,X78,X79] :
      ( ( kn3
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(not(and(esk37_0,esk38_0)),not(and(esk38_0,esk36_0))))) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X77,X78),implies(not(and(X78,X79)),not(and(X79,X77)))))
        | ~ kn3 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_61,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] :
      ( ( substitution_of_equivalents
        | esk3_0 != esk4_0 )
      & ( substitution_of_equivalents
        | is_a_theorem(equiv(esk3_0,esk4_0)) )
      & ( X11 = X12
        | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X11,X12))
        | ~ substitution_of_equivalents ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[substitution_of_equivalents])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(not(implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58])]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    and(X1,implies(X2,not(X3))) = not(implies(X1,and(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(not(X2))),X3) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_36]),c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( ~ kn3
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(not(and(X2,X3)),not(and(X3,X1))))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    kn3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn3]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
    | ~ substitution_of_equivalents
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[use_substitution_of_equivalents]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(X1,implies(X2,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(not(implies(X1,and(X2,not(X3))))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    not(implies(or(X1,X2),and(X2,X1))) = equiv(not(X1),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_43]),c_0_64]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X3),X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,not(not(X3))))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),or(and(X2,X3),not(and(X3,X1))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_43]),c_0_67])]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69])]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(equiv(not(not(X1)),X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),c_0_33]),c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(and(X2,X3),X2),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_46]),c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,not(X2)),not(and(X2,X3)))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_73]),c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
    | not(not(X1)) = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,and(not(X1),X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(not(and(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1))
    | not(not(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_52]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82])]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    not(and(X1,X2)) = implies(X1,not(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_83]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,and(not(X1),X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_84]) ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,and(X1,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_83]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X2),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_82]),c_0_43]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,and(X1,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_43]),c_0_83]) ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    and(X1,not(X2)) = not(implies(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_83]) ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,not(X1)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_77]),c_0_84]) ).

fof(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[principia_r2]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,not(implies(X1,X3))))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_89]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_83]),c_0_43]) ).

fof(c_0_94,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_91]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X3),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(X2,not(X2)),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,not(X3)),implies(X3,X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_43]),c_0_36]),c_0_59]) ).

fof(c_0_98,plain,
    ! [X97,X98] :
      ( ( r2
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0))) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(X98,or(X97,X98)))
        | ~ r2 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r2])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_99,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X3),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_43]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_97]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0)))
    | r2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_98]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_99]) ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103]) ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL519+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:37:33 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.25/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.25/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % new_bool_1 with pid 1615630 completed with status 9
% 1.25/0.63  % sh5l with pid 1615631 completed with status 9
% 1.25/0.63  % new_bool_3 with pid 1615629 completed with status 9
% 1.25/0.63  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 1615628 completed with status 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 1.25/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.25/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.25/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.25/0.63  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 1.25/0.63  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 1615644 completed with status 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 1.25/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.25/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.25/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.25/0.63  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 1.25/0.63  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 1.25/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.25/0.63  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.25/0.63  
% 1.25/0.63  % Proof found!
% 1.25/0.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.25/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/0.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 43
% 1.25/0.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Initial clauses                      : 72
% 1.25/0.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 72
% 1.25/0.63  % Processed clauses                    : 2779
% 1.25/0.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 158
% 1.25/0.63  % ...subsumed                          : 1892
% 1.25/0.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 729
% 1.25/0.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 57
% 1.25/0.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 138
% 1.25/0.63  % Generated clauses                    : 9122
% 1.25/0.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7781
% 1.25/0.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 1.25/0.63  % Paramodulations                      : 9122
% 1.25/0.63  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6168
% 1.25/0.63  % ...of those cached                   : 4685
% 1.25/0.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.25/0.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.25/0.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.25/0.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.25/0.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.25/0.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.25/0.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.25/0.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.25/0.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.25/0.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.25/0.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.25/0.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.25/0.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 473
% 1.25/0.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 115
% 1.25/0.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.25/0.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 12
% 1.25/0.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 346
% 1.25/0.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4573
% 1.25/0.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 9590
% 1.25/0.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 256
% 1.25/0.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18172
% 1.25/0.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17946
% 1.25/0.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1918
% 1.25/0.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2973
% 1.25/0.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 685
% 1.25/0.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 57
% 1.25/0.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.25/0.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 121911
% 1.25/0.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1092
% 1.25/0.63  
% 1.25/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.25/0.63  % User time                : 0.184 s
% 1.25/0.63  % System time              : 0.016 s
% 1.25/0.63  % Total time               : 0.200 s
% 1.25/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 3944 pages
% 1.25/0.63  
% 1.25/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.25/0.63  % User time                : 0.946 s
% 1.25/0.63  % System time              : 0.109 s
% 1.25/0.63  % Total time               : 1.054 s
% 1.25/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 1.25/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------