↑ Up

SATCoP---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : LCL526+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:04:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 11.41s 1.82s
% Output   : Proof 11.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    ~ substitution_strict_equiv,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ( ~ sPE(sK60,sK61)
    | substitution_strict_equiv ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',substitution_strict_equiv)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(sK60,sK61))
    | substitution_strict_equiv ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',substitution_strict_equiv)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(sK60,sK61))
    | ~ substitution_of_equivalents
    | sPE(sK60,sK61) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',substitution_of_equivalents)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',use_substitution_of_equivalents)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ sPE(strict_equiv(sK60,sK61),and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(sK60,sK61))
    | is_a_theorem(and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ( ~ op_strict_equiv
    | sPE(strict_equiv(sK60,sK61),and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_equiv)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    op_strict_equiv,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_equiv)]) ).

cnf(g9,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60)),strict_implies(sK61,sK60)))
    | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK61,sK60)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens)]) ).

cnf(g10,plain,
    ( ~ and_2
    | is_a_theorem(implies(and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60)),strict_implies(sK61,sK60))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_2)]) ).

cnf(g11,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60)),strict_implies(sK60,sK61)))
    | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK60,sK61)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens)]) ).

cnf(g12,plain,
    ( ~ and_1
    | is_a_theorem(implies(and(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),strict_implies(sK61,sK60)),strict_implies(sK60,sK61))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_1)]) ).

cnf(g13,plain,
    axiom_M,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL007+2.ax',km5_axiom_M)]) ).

cnf(g14,plain,
    and_2,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_2)]) ).

cnf(g15,plain,
    ( ~ op_strict_implies
    | sPE(strict_implies(sK61,sK60),necessarily(implies(sK61,sK60))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies)]) ).

cnf(g16,plain,
    ( ~ op_strict_implies
    | sPE(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),necessarily(implies(sK60,sK61))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies)]) ).

cnf(g17,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_1)]) ).

cnf(g18,plain,
    ( ~ sPE(strict_implies(sK61,sK60),necessarily(implies(sK61,sK60)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK61,sK60))
    | is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(sK61,sK60))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(g19,plain,
    ( ~ sPE(strict_implies(sK60,sK61),necessarily(implies(sK60,sK61)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK60,sK61))
    | is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(sK60,sK61))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(g20,plain,
    equivalence_3,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_equivalence_3)]) ).

cnf(g21,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK61,sK60))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK61,sK60),equiv(sK60,sK61)))
    | is_a_theorem(equiv(sK60,sK61)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens)]) ).

cnf(g22,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK60,sK61))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK60,sK61),implies(implies(sK61,sK60),equiv(sK60,sK61))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK61,sK60),equiv(sK60,sK61))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens)]) ).

cnf(g23,plain,
    ( ~ equivalence_3
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK60,sK61),implies(implies(sK61,sK60),equiv(sK60,sK61)))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',equivalence_3)]) ).

cnf(g24,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies)]) ).

cnf(g25,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(sK61,sK60)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(sK61,sK60)),implies(sK61,sK60)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(sK61,sK60)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens)]) ).

cnf(g26,plain,
    ( ~ axiom_M
    | is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(sK61,sK60)),implies(sK61,sK60))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_M)]) ).

cnf(g27,plain,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(sK60,sK61)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(sK60,sK61)),implies(sK60,sK61)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(sK60,sK61)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens)]) ).

cnf(g28,plain,
    ( ~ axiom_M
    | is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(sK60,sK61)),implies(sK60,sK61))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_M)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL526+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 19:27:25 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.41/1.82  % symbols: 165
% 11.41/1.82  % clauses: 159
% 11.41/1.82  % start clauses: 1
% 11.41/1.82  % iterative deepening steps: 1892
% 11.41/1.82  % maximum path limit: 6
% 11.41/1.82  % literal attempts: 1951064
% 11.41/1.82  % depth failures: 1171790
% 11.41/1.82  % regularity failures: 159801
% 11.41/1.82  % tautology failures: 70379
% 11.41/1.82  % reductions: 182076
% 11.41/1.82  % extensions: 1767646
% 11.41/1.82  % SAT variables: 320644
% 11.41/1.82  % SAT clauses: 362621
% 11.41/1.82  % WalkSAT solutions: 362611
% 11.41/1.82  % CDCL solutions: 8
% 11.41/1.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 11.41/1.82  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------