↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : LCL529+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:02:14 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 24.59s 3.69s
% Output   : Proof 24.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   61 (  26   ~;  22   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   4 sgn  21   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f74,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X,Y] : strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f74_nnf,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] : strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f74]) ).

fof(f74_sk,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y))
      | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f74_nnf]) ).

cnf(c132,plain,
    ( strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f74_sk]) ).

fof(f84,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f84_nnf,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f84]) ).

cnf(c142,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f84_nnf]) ).

cnf(p228,plain,
    strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c132,c142]) ).

fof(f49,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',necessitation) ).

fof(f49_nnf,plain,
    ( ( ? [X] :
          ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
      | necessitation )
    & ( ! [X] :
          ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X) )
      | ~ necessitation ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f49]) ).

fof(f49_sk,plain,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(sk55))
          & is_a_theorem(sk55) )
        | necessitation )
      & ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
        | ~ necessitation ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk55])],[f49_nnf]) ).

cnf(c78,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f49_sk]) ).

fof(f77,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',km5_necessitation) ).

fof(f77_nnf,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f77]) ).

cnf(c135,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f77_nnf]) ).

cnf(p160,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c78,c135]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_1) ).

fof(f6_nnf,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | and_1 )
    & ( ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | ~ and_1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

fof(f6_sk,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(sk13,sk14),sk13))
        | and_1 )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))
        | ~ and_1 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk13,sk14])],[f6_nnf]) ).

cnf(c15,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
    | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f6_sk]) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    and_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_and_1) ).

fof(f39_nnf,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f39]) ).

cnf(c68,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f39_nnf]) ).

cnf(p151,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c15,c68]) ).

cnf(p168,plain,
    is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p160,p151]) ).

cnf(p234,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[p228,p168]) ).

fof(f63,axiom,
    ( axiom_m2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m2) ).

fof(f63_nnf,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | axiom_m2 )
    & ( ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | ~ axiom_m2 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f63]) ).

fof(f63_sk,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sk78,sk79),sk78))
        | axiom_m2 )
      & ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X))
        | ~ axiom_m2 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk78,sk79])],[f63_nnf]) ).

cnf(c113,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sk78,sk79),sk78))
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f63_sk]) ).

cnf(p260,plain,
    axiom_m2,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p234,c113]) ).

fof(f87,conjecture,
    axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).

fof(f87_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f87]) ).

fof(f87_nnf,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f87_neg]) ).

fof(f87_sk,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f87_nnf]) ).

cnf(c145,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f87_sk]) ).

cnf(p262,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p260,c145]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL529+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 23:41:34 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 24.59/3.69  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 24.59/3.69  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------