↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL529+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:58:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   81 (  28 unt;   8 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  151 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  129 (  59   ~;  53   |;   0   &)
%                                         (  11 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   15 (  13 usr;  13 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn  37   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_1) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    and_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_1) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',necessitation) ).

fof(f64,axiom,
    ( axiom_m2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m2) ).

fof(f75,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+2.ax',km5_necessitation) ).

fof(f85,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f88,conjecture,
    axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).

fof(f89,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f88]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(flattening,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
   => axiom_m2 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( necessitation
   => ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( and_1
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
    | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ( axiom_m2
    | ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ( axiom_m2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f138]) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
      | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ( axiom_m2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f142]) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f197,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
      | and_1 ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f149]) ).

fof(f213,plain,
    ~ and_1,
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f169]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | necessitation ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f179]) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    ( ~ axiom_m2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f183]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
      | op_strict_implies ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f185]) ).

fof(f224,plain,
    ~ necessitation,
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f188]) ).

fof(f227,plain,
    ~ op_strict_implies,
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f194]) ).

fof(f229,plain,
    axiom_m2,
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f197]) ).

fof(f239,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> op_strict_implies ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f241,plain,
    ( op_strict_implies
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f239]) ).

fof(f243,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f244,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f243]) ).

fof(f245,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f221,f243,f239]) ).

fof(f255,definition,
    ( spl2_7
  <=> is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f257,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0))
    | spl2_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f255]) ).

fof(f259,definition,
    ( spl2_8
  <=> axiom_m2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f261,plain,
    ( ~ axiom_m2
    | spl2_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f259]) ).

fof(f262,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_7
    | ~ spl2_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f219,f259,f255]) ).

fof(f288,definition,
    ( spl2_15
  <=> necessitation ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_15])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f290,plain,
    ( necessitation
    | ~ spl2_15 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f288]) ).

fof(f292,definition,
    ( spl2_16
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_16])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f293,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ spl2_16 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f292]) ).

fof(f294,plain,
    ( spl2_15
    | spl2_16 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f218,f292,f288]) ).

fof(f384,definition,
    ( spl2_39
  <=> and_1 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_39])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f386,plain,
    ( and_1
    | ~ spl2_39 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f384]) ).

fof(f388,definition,
    ( spl2_40
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_40])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f389,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
    | ~ spl2_40 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f388]) ).

fof(f390,plain,
    ( spl2_39
    | spl2_40 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f201,f388,f384]) ).

fof(f439,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f241,f227]) ).

fof(f440,plain,
    ~ spl2_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f439]) ).

fof(f443,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_8 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f261,f229]) ).

fof(f444,plain,
    spl2_8,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f443]) ).

fof(f451,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_15 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f290,f224]) ).

fof(f452,plain,
    ~ spl2_15,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f451]) ).

fof(f475,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_39 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f386,f213]) ).

fof(f476,plain,
    ~ spl2_39,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f475]) ).

fof(f490,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)))
    | ~ spl2_4
    | spl2_7 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f257,f244]) ).

fof(f504,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0))
    | ~ spl2_4
    | spl2_7
    | ~ spl2_16 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f490,f293]) ).

fof(f505,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_4
    | spl2_7
    | ~ spl2_16
    | ~ spl2_40 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f504,f389]) ).

fof(f507,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_4
    | spl2_7
    | ~ spl2_16
    | ~ spl2_40 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f505]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f245]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_7
    | ~ spl2_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f262]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    ( spl2_15
    | spl2_16 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f294]) ).

cnf(s20,plain,
    ( spl2_39
    | spl2_40 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f390]) ).

cnf(s27,plain,
    ~ spl2_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f440]) ).

cnf(s29,plain,
    spl2_8,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f444]) ).

cnf(s33,plain,
    ~ spl2_15,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f452]) ).

cnf(s45,plain,
    ~ spl2_39,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f476]) ).

cnf(s52,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_4
    | spl2_7
    | ~ spl2_16
    | ~ spl2_40 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f507]) ).

cnf(s59,plain,
    spl2_40,
    inference(rat,[],[s20,s45]) ).

cnf(s71,plain,
    spl2_16,
    inference(rat,[],[s8,s33]) ).

cnf(s75,plain,
    ~ spl2_7,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s29]) ).

cnf(s76,plain,
    ~ spl2_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s52,s59,s71,s75]) ).

cnf(s78,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s76,s27]) ).

fof(f508,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s78]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL529+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:58:51 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705812)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=3146406394:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3705812-3705831"...
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)...printing done.
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705826)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705831)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.12/0.45  % (3705812)Success in time 0.034 s
% 0.12/0.45  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------