↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL531+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BVlt1t9axg true

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:36:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 0.91s
% Output   : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  20 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  166 (  17   ~;  14   |;   1   &; 126   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0   ^;  34   !;   0   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(and_type,type,
    and: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(is_a_theorem_type,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

thf(necessarily_type,type,
    necessarily: $i > $i ).

thf(axiom_m4_type,type,
    axiom_m4: $o ).

thf(strict_implies_type,type,
    strict_implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(op_strict_implies_type,type,
    op_strict_implies: $o ).

thf(necessitation_type,type,
    necessitation: $o ).

thf(and_3_type,type,
    and_3: $o ).

thf(modus_ponens_type,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

thf(implies_type,type,
    implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(implies_2_type,type,
    implies_2: $o ).

thf(sk__83_type,type,
    sk__83: $i ).

thf(axiom_m4,axiom,
    ( axiom_m4
  <=> ! [X: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ X @ ( and @ X @ X ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl117,plain,
    ( axiom_m4
    | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ sk__83 @ ( and @ sk__83 @ sk__83 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[axiom_m4]) ).

thf(s1_0_axiom_m4,conjecture,
    axiom_m4 ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[s1_0_axiom_m4]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl145,plain,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl157,plain,
    ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ sk__83 @ ( and @ sk__83 @ sk__83 ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl117,zip_derived_cl145]) ).

thf(and_3,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ ( and @ X @ Y ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl19,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( and @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) )
      | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[and_3]) ).

thf(hilbert_and_3,axiom,
    and_3 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl70,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_and_3]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl293,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( and @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl19,zip_derived_cl70]) ).

thf(implies_2,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[implies_2]) ).

thf(hilbert_implies_2,axiom,
    implies_2 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl66,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_implies_2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl205,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl11,zip_derived_cl66]) ).

thf(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( ( is_a_theorem @ X )
          & ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) )
       => ( is_a_theorem @ Y ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[modus_ponens]) ).

thf(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens ).

thf(zip_derived_cl63,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl146,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl0,zip_derived_cl63]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl206,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl205,zip_derived_cl146]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl296,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( and @ X0 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl293,zip_derived_cl206]) ).

thf(op_strict_implies,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( strict_implies @ X @ Y )
        = ( necessarily @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl132,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( strict_implies @ X0 @ X1 )
        = ( necessarily @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[op_strict_implies]) ).

thf(s1_0_op_strict_implies,axiom,
    op_strict_implies ).

thf(zip_derived_cl142,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[s1_0_op_strict_implies]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl201,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( strict_implies @ X0 @ X1 )
      = ( necessarily @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl132,zip_derived_cl142]) ).

thf(necessitation,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X: $i] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem @ X )
       => ( is_a_theorem @ ( necessarily @ X ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl78,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( necessarily @ X0 ) )
      | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[necessitation]) ).

thf(km5_necessitation,axiom,
    necessitation ).

thf(zip_derived_cl135,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[km5_necessitation]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl155,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( necessarily @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl78,zip_derived_cl135]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl202,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl201,zip_derived_cl155]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl421,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ X0 @ ( and @ X0 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl296,zip_derived_cl202]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl505,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl157,zip_derived_cl421]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL531+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BVlt1t9axg true
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 18:32:59 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.11/0.37  % Running in FO mode
% 0.38/0.59  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.38/0.59  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.38/0.59  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.40/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.40/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.40/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.40/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.40/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.40/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo17_bce.sh running for 50s
% 0.40/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo8.sh running for 50s
% 0.44/0.91  % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 0.44/0.91  % done 276 iterations in 0.157s
% 0.44/0.91  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.44/0.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.91  
% 0.44/0.91  
% 0.44/0.91  % Terminating...
% 0.44/0.97  % Runner terminated.
% 0.44/0.99  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------