↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL533+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 106.55s 15.04s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 106.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   36
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  153 (  99 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  222 (  44 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  116 (  47   ~;  44   |;   4   &)
%                                         (  14 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   21 (  19 usr;  19 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  204 (   6 sgn  37   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
    ( substitution_of_equivalents
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( is_a_theorem(equiv(X,Y))
       => X = Y ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',substitution_of_equivalents) ).

fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y),not(X)),implies(X,Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',modus_tollens) ).

fof(implies_1,axiom,
    ( implies_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_1) ).

fof(implies_2,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(X,Y)),implies(X,Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_2) ).

fof(implies_3,axiom,
    ( implies_3
  <=> ! [X,Y,Z] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_3) ).

fof(and_2,axiom,
    ( and_2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',and_2) ).

fof(and_3,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,and(X,Y)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',and_3) ).

fof(or_2,axiom,
    ( or_2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(Y,or(X,Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',or_2) ).

fof(or_3,axiom,
    ( or_3
  <=> ! [X,Y,Z] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Z),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(or(X,Y),Z)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',or_3) ).

fof(equivalence_3,axiom,
    ( equivalence_3
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,X),equiv(X,Y)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equivalence_3) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X,Y] : or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_or) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X,Y] : implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_implies_and) ).

fof(necessitation,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',necessitation) ).

fof(axiom_M,axiom,
    ( axiom_M
  <=> ! [X] : is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),X)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_M) ).

fof(axiom_m6,axiom,
    ( axiom_m6
  <=> ! [X] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,possibly(X))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_m6) ).

fof(op_possibly,axiom,
    ( op_possibly
   => ! [X] : possibly(X) = not(necessarily(not(X))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_possibly) ).

fof(op_strict_implies,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X,Y] : strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m6,conjecture,
    axiom_m6,
    file('theBenchmark.p',s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m6) ).

fof(s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m6_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m6,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m6]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(A,B))
    | ~ substitution_of_equivalents ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[substitution_of_equivalents]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A)))
    | ~ modus_tollens ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A)))
    | ~ implies_1 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_1]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_2]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C))))
    | ~ implies_3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_3]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),B))
    | ~ and_2 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[and_2]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,and(A,B))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[and_3]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,or(B,A)))
    | ~ or_2 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[or_2]) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,B),implies(or(A,C),B))))
    | ~ or_3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[or_3]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,A),equiv(A,B))))
    | ~ equivalence_3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equivalence_3]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    ( or(A,B) = not(and(not(A),not(B)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_or]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    ( not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B)
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_115]) ).

cnf(c_119,plain,
    ( not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and]) ).

fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

cnf(c_122,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

cnf(c_123,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

cnf(c_125,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_tollens,axiom,
    modus_tollens,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

cnf(c_126,plain,
    modus_tollens,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_tollens]) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_1,axiom,
    implies_1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_1) ).

cnf(c_127,plain,
    implies_1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_2,axiom,
    implies_2,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_2) ).

cnf(c_128,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_2]) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_3,axiom,
    implies_3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_3) ).

cnf(c_129,plain,
    implies_3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).

fof(hilbert_and_2,axiom,
    and_2,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_and_2) ).

cnf(c_131,plain,
    and_2,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_2]) ).

fof(hilbert_and_3,axiom,
    and_3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_and_3) ).

cnf(c_132,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_3]) ).

fof(hilbert_or_2,axiom,
    or_2,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_or_2) ).

cnf(c_134,plain,
    or_2,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_2]) ).

fof(hilbert_or_3,axiom,
    or_3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_or_3) ).

cnf(c_135,plain,
    or_3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_3]) ).

fof(hilbert_equivalence_3,axiom,
    equivalence_3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_equivalence_3) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    equivalence_3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_equivalence_3]) ).

fof(use_substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    file('theBenchmark.p',use_substitution_of_equivalents) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[use_substitution_of_equivalents]) ).

cnf(c_140,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[necessitation]) ).

cnf(c_156,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),A))
    | ~ axiom_M ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_M]) ).

fof(nnf_50,plain,
    ( ( ? [X] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,possibly(X)))
      | axiom_m6 )
    & ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,possibly(X0)))
      | ~ axiom_m6 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m6]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_m6_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,possibly(sK0)))
      | axiom_m6 )
    & ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,possibly(X0)))
      | ~ axiom_m6 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0)],[nnf_50]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_m6,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,possibly(sK0)))
      | axiom_m6 )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(VAR_0,possibly(VAR_0)))
        | ~ axiom_m6 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_m6_sk]) ).

cnf(c_183,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,possibly(sK0)))
    | axiom_m6 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_m6]) ).

cnf(c_192,plain,
    ( possibly(A) = not(necessarily(not(A)))
    | ~ op_possibly ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_possibly]) ).

cnf(c_193,plain,
    ( not(necessarily(not(A))) = possibly(A)
    | ~ op_possibly ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_192]) ).

cnf(c_196,plain,
    ( strict_implies(A,B) = necessarily(implies(A,B))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[op_strict_implies]) ).

cnf(c_197,plain,
    ( necessarily(implies(A,B)) = strict_implies(A,B)
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_196]) ).

fof(km5_op_possibly,axiom,
    op_possibly,
    file('theBenchmark.p',km5_op_possibly) ).

cnf(c_200,plain,
    op_possibly,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[km5_op_possibly]) ).

fof(km5_necessitation,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('theBenchmark.p',km5_necessitation) ).

cnf(c_201,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[km5_necessitation]) ).

fof(km5_axiom_M,axiom,
    axiom_M,
    file('theBenchmark.p',km5_axiom_M) ).

cnf(c_203,plain,
    axiom_M,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[km5_axiom_M]) ).

fof(s1_0_op_strict_implies,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

cnf(c_206,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_strict_implies]) ).

cnf(c_208,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m6,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m6_neg]) ).

cnf(c_209,plain,
    not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_122,c_116]) ).

cnf(c_210,plain,
    not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_212,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_125,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_213,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_214,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_69]) ).

cnf(c_215,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_216,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_73]) ).

cnf(c_218,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_219,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,and(A,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_221,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,or(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_134,c_83]) ).

cnf(c_222,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,B),implies(or(A,C),B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_85]) ).

cnf(c_225,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,A),equiv(A,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_91]) ).

cnf(c_226,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_228,plain,
    not(necessarily(not(A))) = possibly(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_193]) ).

cnf(c_229,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_201,c_140]) ).

cnf(c_231,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_156]) ).

cnf(c_233,plain,
    necessarily(implies(A,B)) = strict_implies(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_206,c_197]) ).

cnf(c_235,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,possibly(sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_208,c_183]) ).

cnf(c_236,plain,
    implies(not(A),B) = or(A,B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_210,c_209]) ).

cnf(c_243,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,not(B)),implies(B,A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_213]) ).

cnf(c_255,plain,
    not(and(A,implies(B,C))) = implies(A,and(B,not(C))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_210,c_210]) ).

cnf(c_259,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(A,B))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_215,c_212]) ).

cnf(c_262,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_212]) ).

cnf(c_289,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,A),equiv(A,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_225,c_212]) ).

cnf(c_307,plain,
    not(and(A,possibly(B))) = implies(A,necessarily(not(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_228,c_210]) ).

cnf(c_19663,plain,
    implies(implies(A,B),C) = or(and(A,not(B)),C),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_210,c_236]) ).

cnf(c_342,plain,
    or(and(A,not(B)),C) = implies(implies(A,B),C),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_19663]) ).

cnf(c_19664,plain,
    implies(possibly(A),B) = or(necessarily(not(A)),B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_228,c_236]) ).

cnf(c_359,plain,
    or(necessarily(not(A)),B) = implies(possibly(A),B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_19664]) ).

cnf(c_375,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,not(not(B))),or(B,A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_243]) ).

cnf(c_19665,plain,
    not(and(A,or(B,C))) = implies(A,and(not(B),not(C))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_255]) ).

cnf(c_536,plain,
    implies(A,and(not(B),not(C))) = not(and(A,or(B,C))),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_19665]) ).

cnf(c_623,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(A,A),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_259,c_222]) ).

cnf(c_624,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,and(A,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_259,c_219]) ).

cnf(c_626,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_259,c_214]) ).

cnf(c_738,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(necessarily(A),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_262,c_231]) ).

cnf(c_2612,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(or(A,B),B),equiv(B,or(A,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_289,c_221]) ).

cnf(c_2615,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,and(B,A)),equiv(and(B,A),A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_289,c_218]) ).

cnf(c_2912,plain,
    implies(implies(A,necessarily(not(B))),C) = or(and(A,possibly(B)),C),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_307,c_236]) ).

cnf(c_7150,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(or(B,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(A,not(not(B)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_375,c_212]) ).

cnf(c_12769,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,A),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_623,c_212]) ).

cnf(c_12810,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,A),A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12769,c_626]) ).

cnf(c_12963,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_738,c_212]) ).

cnf(c_13335,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),and(A,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12963,c_624]) ).

cnf(c_13396,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(and(necessarily(not(A)),or(A,A)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_536,c_13335]) ).

cnf(c_17620,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equiv(B,or(A,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,B),B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2612,c_212]) ).

cnf(c_17623,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equiv(A,or(A,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17620,c_12810]) ).

cnf(c_17669,plain,
    or(A,A) = A,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17623,c_226]) ).

cnf(c_17674,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(and(necessarily(not(A)),A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17669,c_13396]) ).

cnf(c_19666,plain,
    necessarily(not(A)) = implies(possibly(A),necessarily(not(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17669,c_359]) ).

cnf(c_17683,plain,
    implies(possibly(A),necessarily(not(A))) = necessarily(not(A)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_19666]) ).

cnf(c_17829,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equiv(and(B,A),A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,and(B,A))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2615,c_212]) ).

cnf(c_18857,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equiv(and(A,A),A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17829,c_624]) ).

cnf(c_19667,plain,
    A = and(A,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18857,c_226]) ).

cnf(c_18875,plain,
    and(A,A) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_19667]) ).

cnf(c_19668,plain,
    not(not(A)) = implies(not(A),A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18875,c_210]) ).

cnf(c_19669,plain,
    not(not(A)) = or(A,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_19668]) ).

cnf(c_18889,plain,
    not(not(A)) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17669,c_19669]) ).

cnf(c_19670,plain,
    not(and(A,implies(not(B),B))) = implies(A,not(B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18875,c_255]) ).

cnf(c_19671,plain,
    not(and(A,or(B,B))) = implies(A,not(B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_19670]) ).

cnf(c_18893,plain,
    not(and(A,B)) = implies(A,not(B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17669,c_19671]) ).

cnf(c_19672,plain,
    or(not(A),B) = implies(implies(not(A),A),B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18875,c_342]) ).

cnf(c_19673,plain,
    or(not(A),B) = implies(or(A,A),B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_19672]) ).

cnf(c_18896,plain,
    or(not(A),B) = implies(A,B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17669,c_19673]) ).

cnf(c_19674,plain,
    implies(implies(possibly(A),necessarily(not(A))),B) = or(possibly(A),B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18875,c_2912]) ).

cnf(c_18905,plain,
    implies(necessarily(not(A)),B) = or(possibly(A),B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17683,c_19674]) ).

cnf(c_18953,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(or(B,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(A,B)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18889,c_7150]) ).

cnf(c_19675,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(not(A)),not(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18893,c_17674]) ).

cnf(c_19028,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(possibly(A),not(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18905,c_19675]) ).

cnf(c_19676,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(not(A),possibly(A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19028,c_18953]) ).

cnf(c_19542,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,possibly(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18896,c_19676]) ).

cnf(c_19677,plain,
    is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(A,possibly(A)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19542,c_229]) ).

cnf(c_19661,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(A,possibly(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_233,c_19677]) ).

cnf(c_19662,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19661,c_235]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL533+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.45  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.46  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:40:23 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.46  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.46  % Process 2101106 was started by sandbox on n007,
% 0.17/0.46  % Fri Sep 25 22:40:23 2026
% 0.17/0.46  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 106.55/15.04  
% 106.55/15.04  % given #500 (T,wt=1): 12850 r1.  [back_unit_del(106),unit_del(b,12810)].
% 106.55/15.04  
% 106.55/15.04  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 106.55/15.04  
% 106.55/15.04  % Proof 1 at 5.16 (+ 1.21) seconds.
% 106.55/15.04  % Length of proof is 117.
% 106.55/15.04  % Level of proof is 14.
% 106.55/15.04  % Maximum clause weight is 40.000.
% 106.55/15.04  % Given clauses 777.
% 106.55/15.04  
% 106.55/15.04  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------