↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : LCL536+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:49:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.43s 7.75s
% Output   : Proof 2.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  26 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   99 (  43   ~;  39   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  18   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(necessitation,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X)) ) ),
    file('LCL007+0.ax',necessitation) ).

fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ( axiom_5
  <=> ! [X] : is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X)))) ),
    file('LCL007+0.ax',axiom_5) ).

fof(axiom_m10,axiom,
    ( axiom_m10
  <=> ! [X] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X)))) ),
    file('LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m10) ).

fof(op_strict_implies,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X,Y] : strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y)) ),
    file('LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(km5_necessitation,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('LCL007+2.ax',km5_necessitation) ).

fof(km5_axiom_5,axiom,
    axiom_5,
    file('LCL007+2.ax',km5_axiom_5) ).

fof(s1_0_op_strict_implies,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(s1_0_m10_axiom_m10,conjecture,
    axiom_m10,
    file('theBenchmark.p',s1_0_m10_axiom_m10) ).

fof(f_50_1,plain,
    ( ( necessitation
      | ? [X] :
          ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
          & is_a_theorem(X) ) )
    & ( ! [X] :
          ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X) )
      | ~ necessitation ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[necessitation]) ).

fof(f_50_2,plain,
    ( ( necessitation
      | ? [U_121] :
          ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(U_121))
          & is_a_theorem(U_121) ) )
    & ( ! [U_120] :
          ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(U_120))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(U_120) )
      | ~ necessitation ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_50_1]) ).

fof(f_50_3,plain,
    ( ( necessitation
      | ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(sK56))
        & is_a_theorem(sK56) ) )
    & ( ! [U_120] :
          ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(U_120))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(U_120) )
      | ~ necessitation ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK56]),skolemize(U_121,sK56)],[f_50_2]) ).

cnf(f_50_4,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(U_120))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(U_120)
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_50_3]) ).

fof(f_58_1,plain,
    ( ( axiom_5
      | ? [X] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X)))) )
    & ( ! [X] : is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X))))
      | ~ axiom_5 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5]) ).

fof(f_58_2,plain,
    ( ( axiom_5
      | ? [U_145] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(U_145),necessarily(possibly(U_145)))) )
    & ( ! [U_144] : is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(U_144),necessarily(possibly(U_144))))
      | ~ axiom_5 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_58_1]) ).

fof(f_58_3,plain,
    ( ( axiom_5
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(sK68),necessarily(possibly(sK68)))) )
    & ( ! [U_144] : is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(U_144),necessarily(possibly(U_144))))
      | ~ axiom_5 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK68]),skolemize(U_145,sK68)],[f_58_2]) ).

cnf(f_58_4,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(U_144),necessarily(possibly(U_144))))
    | ~ axiom_5 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_58_3]) ).

fof(f_72_1,plain,
    ( ( axiom_m10
      | ? [X] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X)))) )
    & ( ! [X] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X))))
      | ~ axiom_m10 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m10]) ).

fof(f_72_2,plain,
    ( ( axiom_m10
      | ? [U_197] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(U_197),necessarily(possibly(U_197)))) )
    & ( ! [U_196] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(U_196),necessarily(possibly(U_196))))
      | ~ axiom_m10 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_72_1]) ).

fof(f_72_3,plain,
    ( ( axiom_m10
      | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))) )
    & ( ! [U_196] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(U_196),necessarily(possibly(U_196))))
      | ~ axiom_m10 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK94]),skolemize(U_197,sK94)],[f_72_2]) ).

cnf(f_72_5,plain,
    ( axiom_m10
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_72_3]) ).

fof(f_75_1,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] : strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_strict_implies]) ).

fof(f_75_2,plain,
    ( ! [U_201,U_200] : strict_implies(U_201,U_200) = necessarily(implies(U_201,U_200))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_75_1]) ).

cnf(f_75_3,plain,
    ( strict_implies(U_201,U_200) = necessarily(implies(U_201,U_200))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_75_2]) ).

fof(f_78_1,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[km5_necessitation]) ).

cnf(f_78_2,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_78_1]) ).

fof(f_81_1,plain,
    axiom_5,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[km5_axiom_5]) ).

cnf(f_81_2,plain,
    axiom_5,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_81_1]) ).

fof(f_85_1,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_strict_implies]) ).

cnf(f_85_2,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_85_1]) ).

fof(f_88_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m10,
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[s1_0_m10_axiom_m10]) ).

fof(f_88_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m10,
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_88_1]) ).

cnf(f_88_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m10,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_88_2]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_13,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(Eq_y_0)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(Eq_x_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ axiom_m10,
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_88_3]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94))))
    | axiom_m10 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_72_5]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))))
    | necessarily(implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))) != strict_implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))
    | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_13]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( strict_implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94))) != necessarily(implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94))))
    | necessarily(implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))) = strict_implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( ~ op_strict_implies
    | strict_implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94))) = necessarily(implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[f_75_3]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[f_85_2]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94))))
    | ~ necessitation
    | is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94))))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[f_50_4]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:2)],[f_78_2]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t12:2]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    ( ~ axiom_5
    | is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(sK94),necessarily(possibly(sK94)))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:3)],[f_58_4]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t12:3]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    axiom_5,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t16:2)],[f_81_2]) ).

cnf(t19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t18:1)],[t18:1,t16:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL536+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/5.39  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 15:12:27 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.43/7.75  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.43/7.75  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------