↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL536+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:58:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  17   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (  22   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f50,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',necessitation) ).

fof(f58,axiom,
    ( axiom_5
  <=> ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X0),necessarily(possibly(X0)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_5) ).

fof(f72,axiom,
    ( axiom_m10
  <=> ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(X0),necessarily(possibly(X0)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m10) ).

fof(f75,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+2.ax',km5_necessitation) ).

fof(f81,axiom,
    axiom_5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+2.ax',km5_axiom_5) ).

fof(f85,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f88,conjecture,
    axiom_m10,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_m10_axiom_m10) ).

fof(f89,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m10,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f88]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ~ axiom_m10,
    inference(flattening,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(X0),necessarily(possibly(X0))))
   => axiom_m10 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f72]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( axiom_5
   => ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X0),necessarily(possibly(X0)))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( necessitation
   => ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X0),necessarily(possibly(X0))))
    | ~ axiom_5 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ( axiom_m10
    | ? [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(X0),necessarily(possibly(X0)))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ necessitation
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ axiom_5
      | is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X0),necessarily(possibly(X0)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(sK0),necessarily(possibly(sK0))))
    | axiom_m10 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138]) ).

fof(f184,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_strict_implies
      | strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    axiom_5,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f81]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    ~ axiom_m10,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f184,f193]) ).

fof(f200,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(sK0),necessarily(possibly(sK0)))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f182,f196]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X0),necessarily(possibly(X0)))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f181,f190]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f178,f187]) ).

fof(f226,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f204,f198]) ).

fof(f311,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(sK0),necessarily(possibly(sK0)))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f226,f200]) ).

fof(f312,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f311,f201]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL536+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:59:52 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708628)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2269936217:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3708628-3708637"...
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708634)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)...printing done.
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708637)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.12/0.45  % (3708628)Success in time 0.029 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------