↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : LCL538+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:36:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 175.49s 175.85s
% Output   : Proof 175.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem    : LCL538+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  5 05:42:44 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 175.49/175.85  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 175.49/175.85  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Iff modus_ponens (∀ (X Y : Iota), And (is_a_theorem X) (is_a_theorem (implies X Y)) → is_a_theorem Y)) True
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #34 (by assumption #[]): Eq modus_ponens True
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #50 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 175.49/175.85    (Iff modus_ponens_strict_implies
% 175.49/175.85      (∀ (X Y : Iota), And (is_a_theorem X) (is_a_theorem (strict_implies X Y)) → is_a_theorem Y))
% 175.49/175.85    True
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #54 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Iff axiom_M (∀ (X : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies (necessarily X) X))) True
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #74 (by assumption #[]): Eq (op_strict_implies → ∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq (strict_implies X Y) (necessarily (implies X Y))) True
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #79 (by assumption #[]): Eq axiom_M True
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #83 (by assumption #[]): Eq op_strict_implies True
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #85 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not modus_ponens_strict_implies) True
% 175.49/175.85  Clause #87 (by clausification #[0]): Or (Eq modus_ponens False)
% 175.49/175.85    (Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), And (is_a_theorem X) (is_a_theorem (implies X Y)) → is_a_theorem Y) True)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #127 (by clausification #[85]): Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies False
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #128 (by clausification #[87]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens False)
% 175.49/175.86      (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), And (is_a_theorem a) (is_a_theorem (implies a Y)) → is_a_theorem Y) True)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #129 (by clausification #[128]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens False) (Eq (And (is_a_theorem a) (is_a_theorem (implies a a_1)) → is_a_theorem a_1) True)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #130 (by clausification #[129]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens False)
% 175.49/175.86      (Or (Eq (And (is_a_theorem a) (is_a_theorem (implies a a_1))) False) (Eq (is_a_theorem a_1) True))
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #131 (by clausification #[130]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens False)
% 175.49/175.86      (Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a) True) (Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a_1) False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a_1 a)) False)))
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #132 (by forward demodulation #[131, 34]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq True False)
% 175.49/175.86      (Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a) True) (Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a_1) False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a_1 a)) False)))
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #133 (by clausification #[132]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a) True) (Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a_1) False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a_1 a)) False))
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #154 (by clausification #[50]): Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True)
% 175.49/175.86    (Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), And (is_a_theorem X) (is_a_theorem (strict_implies X Y)) → is_a_theorem Y) False)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #156 (by clausification #[154]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True)
% 175.49/175.86      (Eq
% 175.49/175.86        (Not
% 175.49/175.86          (∀ (Y : Iota), And (is_a_theorem (skS.0 14 a)) (is_a_theorem (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a) Y)) → is_a_theorem Y))
% 175.49/175.86        True)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #157 (by clausification #[156]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True)
% 175.49/175.86      (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), And (is_a_theorem (skS.0 14 a)) (is_a_theorem (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a) Y)) → is_a_theorem Y)
% 175.49/175.86        False)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #158 (by clausification #[157]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True)
% 175.49/175.86      (Eq
% 175.49/175.86        (Not
% 175.49/175.86          (And (is_a_theorem (skS.0 14 a)) (is_a_theorem (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a) (skS.0 15 a a_1))) →
% 175.49/175.86            is_a_theorem (skS.0 15 a a_1)))
% 175.49/175.86        True)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #159 (by clausification #[158]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True)
% 175.49/175.86      (Eq
% 175.49/175.86        (And (is_a_theorem (skS.0 14 a)) (is_a_theorem (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a) (skS.0 15 a a_1))) →
% 175.49/175.86          is_a_theorem (skS.0 15 a a_1))
% 175.49/175.86        False)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #160 (by clausification #[159]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True)
% 175.49/175.86      (Eq (And (is_a_theorem (skS.0 14 a)) (is_a_theorem (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a) (skS.0 15 a a_1)))) True)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #161 (by clausification #[159]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (skS.0 15 a a_1)) False)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #162 (by clausification #[160]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.49/175.86    Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a) (skS.0 15 a a_1))) True)
% 175.49/175.86  Clause #163 (by clausification #[160]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq modus_ponens_strict_implies True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (skS.0 14 a)) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #164 (by forward demodulation #[162, 127]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq False True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a) (skS.0 15 a a_1))) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #165 (by clausification #[164]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a) (skS.0 15 a a_1))) True
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #166 (by superposition #[165, 133]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 175.58/176.01    Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a) True)
% 175.58/176.01      (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a_1) (skS.0 15 a_1 a_2)) a)) False))
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #174 (by clausification #[54]): Or (Eq axiom_M False) (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies (necessarily X) X)) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #178 (by clausification #[174]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq axiom_M False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (necessarily a) a)) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #179 (by forward demodulation #[178, 79]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (necessarily a) a)) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #180 (by clausification #[179]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (necessarily a) a)) True
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #265 (by forward demodulation #[163, 127]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq False True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (skS.0 14 a)) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #266 (by clausification #[265]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (skS.0 14 a)) True
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #267 (by superposition #[266, 133]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 175.58/176.01    Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 14 a_1) a)) False))
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #623 (by forward demodulation #[161, 127]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq False True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (skS.0 15 a a_1)) False)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #624 (by clausification #[623]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (skS.0 15 a a_1)) False
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1053 (by clausification #[74]): Or (Eq op_strict_implies False) (Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq (strict_implies X Y) (necessarily (implies X Y))) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1054 (by clausification #[1053]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 175.58/176.01    Or (Eq op_strict_implies False) (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (strict_implies a Y) (necessarily (implies a Y))) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1055 (by clausification #[1054]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq op_strict_implies False) (Eq (Eq (strict_implies a a_1) (necessarily (implies a a_1))) True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1056 (by clausification #[1055]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq op_strict_implies False) (Eq (strict_implies a a_1) (necessarily (implies a a_1)))
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1057 (by forward demodulation #[1056, 83]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (strict_implies a a_1) (necessarily (implies a a_1)))
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1058 (by clausification #[1057]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (strict_implies a a_1) (necessarily (implies a a_1))
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1089 (by superposition #[1058, 180]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (strict_implies a a_1) (implies a a_1))) True
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1276 (by clausification #[166]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 175.58/176.01    Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a) True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (strict_implies (skS.0 14 a_1) (skS.0 15 a_1 a_2)) a)) False)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1283 (by superposition #[1276, 1089]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 14 a) (skS.0 15 a a_1))) True) (Eq False True)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #1504 (by clausification #[267]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (is_a_theorem a) True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 14 a_1) a)) False)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #20047 (by clausification #[1283]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 14 a) (skS.0 15 a a_1))) True
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #20048 (by superposition #[20047, 1504]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (is_a_theorem (skS.0 15 a a_1)) True) (Eq True False)
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #20133 (by clausification #[20048]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (skS.0 15 a a_1)) True
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #20134 (by superposition #[20133, 624]): Eq True False
% 175.58/176.01  Clause #20137 (by clausification #[20134]): False
% 175.58/176.01  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------