↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : LCL540+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:54:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 15.43s 4.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 15.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  16   ~;  13   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( 'modus$uponens'
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1))
          & 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) )
       => 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1) ) ) ).

fof(and_3,axiom,
    ( 'and$u3'
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
    'modus$uponens' ).

fof(hilbert_and_3,axiom,
    'and$u3' ).

fof(adjunction,axiom,
    ( adjunction
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1)
          & 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) )
       => 'is$ua$utheorem'(and(X0,X1)) ) ) ).

fof(s1_0_adjunction,conjecture,
    adjunction ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ adjunction,
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[s1_0_adjunction]) ).

cnf(c6,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1)
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0)
    | ~ 'modus$uponens' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c25,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ 'and$u3' ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[and_3]) ).

cnf(c69,plain,
    'modus$uponens',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c76,plain,
    'and$u3',
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[hilbert_and_3]) ).

cnf(c92,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(sK128)
    | adjunction ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[adjunction]) ).

cnf(c93,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(sK129)
    | adjunction ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[adjunction]) ).

cnf(c94,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(and(sK128,sK129))
    | adjunction ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[adjunction]) ).

cnf(c146,plain,
    ~ adjunction,
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(and(sK128,sK129)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c146,c94]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X1,X0))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1)
    | 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c69,c6]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c76,c25]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d1,d2]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    ( 'is$ua$utheorem'(and(X0,X1))
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X1)
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,d1]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    ( ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(sK128)
    | ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(sK129) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d4,d0]) ).

cnf(d6,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(sK128),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c146,c92]) ).

cnf(d7,plain,
    ~ 'is$ua$utheorem'(sK129),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d6,d5]) ).

cnf(d8,plain,
    'is$ua$utheorem'(sK129),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c146,c93]) ).

cnf(d9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d8,d7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LCL540+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.42  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:43:07 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 15.43/4.81  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 15.43/4.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------