↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL540+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  24   ~;  25   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn  12   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(and_3,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,and(X,Y)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',and_3) ).

fof(adjunction,axiom,
    ( adjunction
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(Y)
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
       => is_a_theorem(and(X,Y)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',adjunction) ).

fof(s1_0_adjunction,conjecture,
    adjunction,
    file('theBenchmark.p',s1_0_adjunction) ).

fof(s1_0_adjunction_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ adjunction,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[s1_0_adjunction]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,and(A,B))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[and_3]) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

cnf(c_126,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

fof(hilbert_and_3,axiom,
    and_3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_and_3) ).

cnf(c_133,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_3]) ).

fof(nnf_34,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] :
          ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(X,Y))
          & is_a_theorem(Y)
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
      | adjunction )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] :
          ( is_a_theorem(and(X0,X1))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
      | ~ adjunction ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[adjunction]) ).

fof(sk_adjunction_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(sK0,sK1))
        & is_a_theorem(sK1)
        & is_a_theorem(sK0) )
      | adjunction )
    & ( ! [X0,X1] :
          ( is_a_theorem(and(X0,X1))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
      | ~ adjunction ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK1)],[nnf_34]) ).

fof(sk_adjunction,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(sK0,sK1))
      | adjunction )
    & ( is_a_theorem(sK1)
      | adjunction )
    & ( is_a_theorem(sK0)
      | adjunction )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(and(VAR_0,VAR_1))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
        | ~ adjunction ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_adjunction_sk]) ).

cnf(c_149,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(sK0)
    | adjunction ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_adjunction]) ).

cnf(c_150,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(sK1)
    | adjunction ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_adjunction]) ).

cnf(c_151,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(sK0,sK1))
    | adjunction ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_adjunction]) ).

cnf(c_209,negated_conjecture,
    ~ adjunction,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[s1_0_adjunction_neg]) ).

cnf(c_213,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_220,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,and(A,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_133,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_236,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(and(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_209,c_151]) ).

cnf(c_237,negated_conjecture,
    is_a_theorem(sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_209,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_238,negated_conjecture,
    is_a_theorem(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_209,c_149]) ).

cnf(c_259,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(B,and(A,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_213]) ).

cnf(c_781,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,and(sK0,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_259,c_238]) ).

cnf(c_1937,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(sK0,A))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_781,c_213]) ).

cnf(c_2022,plain,
    is_a_theorem(and(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1937,c_237]) ).

cnf(c_2021,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_2022]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL540+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.29  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:42:20 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.29  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.03/0.29  % Process 3245417 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.03/0.29  % Fri Sep 25 22:42:20 2026
% 0.03/0.29  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.03/0.31  
% 0.03/0.31  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.07/0.48  
% 0.07/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.48  
% 0.07/0.48  % Proof 1 at 0.10 (+ 0.05) seconds.
% 0.07/0.48  % Length of proof is 21.
% 0.07/0.48  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.07/0.48  % Maximum clause weight is 31.000.
% 0.07/0.48  % Given clauses 248.
% 0.07/0.48  
% 0.07/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------