↑ Up

Drodi---4.1.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi---4.1.1
% Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:07:57 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 10.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  14 unt;   8 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  132 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  125 (  51   ~;  52   |;   8   &)
%                                         (  12 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   15 (  13 usr;  13 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (  37   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    and_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f64,axiom,
    ( axiom_m2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f75,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X,Y] : strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f86,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f89,conjecture,
    axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f90,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f89]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | and_1 )
    & ( ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | ~ and_1 ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(sK13_skl,sK14_skl),sK13_skl))
      | and_1 )
    & ( ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | ~ and_1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13_skl,sK14_skl]),skolemize(X,sK13_skl),skolemize(Y,sK14_skl)],[f121]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
      | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f122]) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

fof(f229,plain,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X) ) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f50]) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ( ( ? [X] :
          ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
          & is_a_theorem(X) )
      | necessitation )
    & ( ! [X] :
          ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X) )
      | ~ necessitation ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f229]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(sK55_skl))
        & is_a_theorem(sK55_skl) )
      | necessitation )
    & ( ! [X] :
          ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X))
          | ~ is_a_theorem(X) )
      | ~ necessitation ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK55_skl]),skolemize(X,sK55_skl)],[f230]) ).

fof(f232,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f231]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    ( ( ? [X,Y] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | axiom_m2 )
    & ( ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | ~ axiom_m2 ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f64]) ).

fof(f297,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK78_skl,sK79_skl),sK78_skl))
      | axiom_m2 )
    & ( ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X))
      | ~ axiom_m2 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK78_skl,sK79_skl]),skolemize(X,sK78_skl),skolemize(Y,sK79_skl)],[f296]) ).

fof(f299,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK78_skl,sK79_skl),sK78_skl))
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f297]) ).

fof(f336,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] : strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f75]) ).

fof(f337,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f336]) ).

fof(f341,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f78]) ).

fof(f349,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f86]) ).

fof(f352,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f90]) ).

fof(f431,definition,
    ( sQ21_spl
  <=> and_1 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ21_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f433,plain,
    ( sQ21_spl
    | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f431]) ).

fof(f434,definition,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sQ22_spl
    <=> is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ22_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f435,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sQ22_spl
      | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f434]) ).

fof(f437,plain,
    ( sQ22_spl
    | ~ sQ21_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f123,f431,f434]) ).

fof(f677,definition,
    ( sQ88_spl
  <=> necessitation ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ88_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f679,plain,
    ( sQ88_spl
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f677]) ).

fof(f680,definition,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sQ89_spl
    <=> ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ89_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f681,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ sQ89_spl
      | is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f680]) ).

fof(f683,plain,
    ( sQ89_spl
    | ~ sQ88_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f232,f677,f680]) ).

fof(f855,definition,
    ( sQ136_spl
  <=> axiom_m2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ136_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f856,plain,
    ( ~ sQ136_spl
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f855]) ).

fof(f862,definition,
    ( sQ138_spl
  <=> is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK78_skl,sK79_skl),sK78_skl)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ138_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f864,plain,
    ( sQ138_spl
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK78_skl,sK79_skl),sK78_skl)) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f862]) ).

fof(f865,plain,
    ( ~ sQ138_spl
    | sQ136_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f299,f855,f862]) ).

fof(f968,definition,
    ( sQ167_spl
  <=> op_strict_implies ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ167_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f970,plain,
    ( sQ167_spl
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f968]) ).

fof(f971,definition,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sQ168_spl
    <=> strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ168_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f972,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sQ168_spl
      | strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f971]) ).

fof(f974,plain,
    ( sQ168_spl
    | ~ sQ167_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f337,f968,f971]) ).

fof(f986,plain,
    ( sQ88_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f679,f341]) ).

fof(f987,plain,
    sQ88_spl,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f986]) ).

fof(f990,plain,
    ( sQ167_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f970,f349]) ).

fof(f991,plain,
    sQ167_spl,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f990]) ).

fof(f1013,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sQ168_spl
      | ~ sQ89_spl
      | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f972,f681]) ).

fof(f1049,plain,
    ( sQ21_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f433,f219]) ).

fof(f1050,plain,
    sQ21_spl,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f1049]) ).

fof(f1100,plain,
    ( ~ sQ168_spl
    | ~ sQ89_spl
    | sQ138_spl
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(sK78_skl,sK79_skl),sK78_skl)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f864,f1013]) ).

fof(f1102,plain,
    ( ~ sQ168_spl
    | ~ sQ89_spl
    | sQ138_spl
    | ~ sQ22_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f1100,f435]) ).

fof(f1103,plain,
    ( ~ sQ168_spl
    | ~ sQ89_spl
    | sQ138_spl
    | ~ sQ22_spl ),
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f1102]) ).

fof(f1104,plain,
    ( ~ sQ136_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f856,f352]) ).

fof(f1105,plain,
    ~ sQ136_spl,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f1104]) ).

fof(f1106,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f437,f683,f865,f974,f987,f991,f1050,f1103,f1105]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/10.38  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:38:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/10.40  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.14/10.42  % Refutation found
% 0.14/10.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 0.14/10.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/10.45  % Elapsed time: 0.055596 seconds
% 0.14/10.45  % CPU time: 0.181076 seconds
% 0.14/10.45  % Total memory used: 87.561 MB
% 0.14/10.45  % Net memory used: 87.452 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------