↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:44:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 11.55s 3.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   34 (   3 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_106,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))
    | ~ necessitation
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x9quiweb/input.p',i_0_106) ).

cnf(i_0_86,plain,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x9quiweb/input.p',i_0_86) ).

cnf(i_0_115,plain,
    ( necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x9quiweb/input.p',i_0_115) ).

cnf(i_0_137,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x9quiweb/input.p',i_0_137) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( axiom_m2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk18_0,esk19_0),esk18_0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x9quiweb/input.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_132,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x9quiweb/input.p',i_0_132) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
    | ~ and_1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x9quiweb/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_59,plain,
    and_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x9quiweb/input.p',i_0_59) ).

cnf(c_0_146,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))
    | ~ necessitation
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    i_0_106 ).

cnf(c_0_147,plain,
    necessitation,
    i_0_86 ).

cnf(c_0_148,plain,
    ( necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    i_0_115 ).

cnf(c_0_149,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    i_0_137 ).

cnf(c_0_150,plain,
    ( axiom_m2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk18_0,esk19_0),esk18_0)) ),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_151,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    i_0_132 ).

cnf(c_0_152,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_146,c_0_147])]) ).

cnf(c_0_153,plain,
    necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_148,c_0_149])]) ).

cnf(c_0_154,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
    | ~ and_1 ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_155,plain,
    and_1,
    i_0_59 ).

cnf(c_0_156,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk18_0,esk19_0),esk18_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_150,c_0_151]) ).

cnf(c_0_157,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_152,c_0_153]) ).

cnf(c_0_158,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_154,c_0_155])]) ).

cnf(c_0_159,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_156,c_0_157]),c_0_158])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 21:49:31 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.12/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 11.55/3.78  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 11.55/3.78  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 11.55/3.78  # Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 11.55/3.78  
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof found!
% 11.55/3.78  # SZS status Theorem
% 11.55/3.78  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object conjectures             : 2
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 11.55/3.78  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 11.55/3.78  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.55/3.78  # Parsed axioms                        : 144
% 11.55/3.78  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Initial clauses                      : 144
% 11.55/3.78  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 144
% 11.55/3.78  # Processed clauses                    : 179
% 11.55/3.78  # ...of these trivial                  : 29
% 11.55/3.78  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 11.55/3.78  # ...remaining for further processing  : 146
% 11.55/3.78  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 11.55/3.78  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 11.55/3.78  # Generated clauses                    : 335
% 11.55/3.78  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 290
% 11.55/3.78  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Paramodulations                      : 335
% 11.55/3.78  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Current number of processed clauses  : 141
% 11.55/3.78  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 52
% 11.55/3.78  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 11.55/3.78  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 11.55/3.78  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 86
% 11.55/3.78  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 252
% 11.55/3.78  # ...number of literals in the above   : 602
% 11.55/3.78  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 11.55/3.78  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 760
% 11.55/3.78  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 630
% 11.55/3.78  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 11.55/3.78  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 118
% 11.55/3.78  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 23
% 11.55/3.78  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 11.55/3.78  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 11.55/3.78  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6008
% 11.55/3.78  
% 11.55/3.78  # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.55/3.78  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 11.55/3.78  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 11.55/3.78  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 11.55/3.78  # ...preprocessing         : 0.011 s
% 11.55/3.78  # ...main loop             : 0.007 s
% 11.55/3.78  # Maximum resident set size: 7424 pages
% 11.55/3.78  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------