↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:58:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  17   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (  29   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_1) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    and_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_1) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',necessitation) ).

fof(f64,axiom,
    ( axiom_m2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m2) ).

fof(f75,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+3.ax',km4b_necessitation) ).

fof(f86,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f89,conjecture,
    axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).

fof(f90,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f89]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(flattening,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
   => axiom_m2 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ( necessitation
   => ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ( and_1
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
    | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ( axiom_m2
    | ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ and_1
      | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f171,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ necessitation
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0))
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_strict_implies
      | strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f143]) ).

fof(f191,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f203,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f188,f198]) ).

fof(f205,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f186,f201]) ).

fof(f210,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f181,f191]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f151,f171]) ).

fof(f233,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f210,f203]) ).

fof(f328,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(sK0,sK1),sK0)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f233,f205]) ).

fof(f329,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f328,f222]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.39  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.39  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 16:05:02 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.40  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750184)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1773901049:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3750184-3750193"...
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750190)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)...printing done.
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.11/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750193)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.11/0.46  % (3750184)Success in time 0.031 s
% 0.16/0.46  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------