↑ Up

Z3---4.15.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.15.1
% Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 03:00:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.43s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : LCL542+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  5 21:51:53 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.43  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.43  tff(is_a_theorem_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     is_a_theorem: $i > $o)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(necessarily_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     necessarily: $i > $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(implies_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(tptp_fun_X_82_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     tptp_fun_X_82: $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(and_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     and: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(tptp_fun_Y_81_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     tptp_fun_Y_81: $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(strict_implies_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     strict_implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(op_strict_implies_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     op_strict_implies: $o)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(axiom_m2_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     axiom_m2: $o)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(and_1_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     and_1: $o)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(tptp_fun_X_17_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     tptp_fun_X_17: $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(tptp_fun_Y_16_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     tptp_fun_Y_16: $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(necessitation_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     necessitation: $o)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(tptp_fun_X_58_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.43     tptp_fun_X_58: $i)).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(1,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      (op_strict_implies <=> op_strict_implies),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(2,axiom,(op_strict_implies), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','s1_0_op_strict_implies')).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(3,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      (op_strict_implies),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[2, 1])).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(4,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      (((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y)))) <=> ((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y))))),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(5,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      (((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y)))) <=> ((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y))))),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(6,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      ((op_strict_implies => ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y)))) <=> ((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y))))),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(7,axiom,(op_strict_implies => ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax','op_strict_implies')).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(8,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      ((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y)))),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 6])).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(9,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      ((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y)))),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 5])).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(10,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      ((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y)))),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 5])).
% 0.14/0.43  tff(11,plain,
% 0.14/0.43      ((~op_strict_implies) | ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (strict_implies(X, Y) = necessarily(implies(X, Y)))),
% 0.14/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 5])).
% 0.14/0.43  Proof display could not be completed: monotonicity rule is not handled
% 0.14/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------