↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL544+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:44:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.62s 2.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   58 (   3 equ;  27 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_106,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))
    | ~ necessitation
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_106) ).

cnf(i_0_86,plain,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_86) ).

cnf(i_0_115,plain,
    ( necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_115) ).

cnf(i_0_137,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_137) ).

cnf(i_0_97,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_97) ).

cnf(i_0_68,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_68) ).

cnf(i_0_79,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_79) ).

cnf(i_0_66,plain,
    implies_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_66) ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    ( axiom_m4
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk23_0,and(esk23_0,esk23_0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(i_0_132,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_132) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_61,plain,
    and_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jn4twkl2/lgb.p',i_0_61) ).

cnf(c_0_150,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))
    | ~ necessitation
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    i_0_106 ).

cnf(c_0_151,plain,
    necessitation,
    i_0_86 ).

cnf(c_0_152,plain,
    ( necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    i_0_115 ).

cnf(c_0_153,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    i_0_137 ).

cnf(c_0_154,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    i_0_97 ).

cnf(c_0_155,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    i_0_68 ).

cnf(c_0_156,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    i_0_79 ).

cnf(c_0_157,plain,
    implies_2,
    i_0_66 ).

cnf(c_0_158,plain,
    ( axiom_m4
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk23_0,and(esk23_0,esk23_0))) ),
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_159,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    i_0_132 ).

cnf(c_0_160,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_150,c_0_151])]) ).

cnf(c_0_161,plain,
    necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_152,c_0_153])]) ).

cnf(c_0_162,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_154,c_0_155])]) ).

cnf(c_0_163,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_156,c_0_157])]) ).

cnf(c_0_164,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_165,plain,
    and_3,
    i_0_61 ).

cnf(c_0_166,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk23_0,and(esk23_0,esk23_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_158,c_0_159]) ).

cnf(c_0_167,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_160,c_0_161]) ).

cnf(c_0_168,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_162,c_0_163]) ).

cnf(c_0_169,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_164,c_0_165])]) ).

cnf(c_0_170,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk23_0,and(esk23_0,esk23_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_166,c_0_167]) ).

cnf(c_0_171,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_168,c_0_169]) ).

cnf(c_0_172,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_170,c_0_171])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL544+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.03/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.29  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 20:12:59 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.34  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.08/0.34  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.08/0.34  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.08/0.34  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.62/2.24  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.62/2.24  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.62/2.24  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.62/2.24  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 7.62/2.24  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.62/2.24  #
% 7.62/2.24  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 7.62/2.24  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.62/2.24  
% 7.62/2.24  # Proof found!
% 7.62/2.24  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.62/2.24  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.62/2.24  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.62/2.24  
% 7.62/2.24  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.62/2.24  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 7.62/2.24  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.62/2.24  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 7.62/2.24  # Maximum resident set size: 3584 pages
% 7.62/2.24  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------