↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL544+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:52:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.94s 1.31s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   24
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   96 (  34 unt;  12 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  203 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  191 (  84   ~;  78   |;   2   &)
%                                         (  17 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   21 (  19 usr;  19 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   0 sgn  59   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X0)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_2) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_3) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    implies_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_2) ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    and_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_and_3) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',necessitation) ).

fof(f66,axiom,
    ( axiom_m4
  <=> ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,and(X0,X0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m4) ).

fof(f75,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',km4b_necessitation) ).

fof(f86,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f89,conjecture,
    axiom_m4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m4) ).

fof(f90,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f89]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    inference(flattening,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
   => axiom_m4 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ( necessitation
   => ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( and_3
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ( implies_2
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
   => ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X0)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ( axiom_m4
    | ? [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,and(X0,X0))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ( axiom_m4
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f141]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1)))
      | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f154,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
      | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f174,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ( axiom_m4
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f145]) ).

fof(f189,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f143]) ).

fof(f192,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f202,plain,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f212,definition,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> op_strict_implies ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f216,definition,
    ( spl1_4
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f217,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f216]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_3
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f189,f216,f212]) ).

fof(f228,definition,
    ( spl1_7
  <=> is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | spl1_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f228]) ).

fof(f232,definition,
    ( spl1_8
  <=> axiom_m4 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f235,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_7
    | spl1_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f187,f232,f228]) ).

fof(f269,definition,
    ( spl1_17
  <=> necessitation ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_17])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f273,definition,
    ( spl1_18
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_18])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f274,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ spl1_18 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f273]) ).

fof(f275,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_17
    | spl1_18 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f182,f273,f269]) ).

fof(f349,definition,
    ( spl1_37
  <=> and_3 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_37])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f353,definition,
    ( spl1_38
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_38])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f354,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ spl1_38 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f353]) ).

fof(f355,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_37
    | spl1_38 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f154,f353,f349]) ).

fof(f381,definition,
    ( spl1_45
  <=> implies_2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_45])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f385,definition,
    ( spl1_46
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_46])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f386,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl1_46 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f385]) ).

fof(f387,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_45
    | spl1_46 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f150,f385,f381]) ).

fof(f413,definition,
    ( spl1_53
  <=> modus_ponens ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_53])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f417,definition,
    ( spl1_54
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_54])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f418,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ spl1_54 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f417]) ).

fof(f419,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_53
    | spl1_54 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f146,f417,f413]) ).

fof(f420,plain,
    ~ spl1_8,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f202,f232]) ).

fof(f432,plain,
    spl1_53,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f167,f413]) ).

fof(f441,plain,
    spl1_45,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f170,f381]) ).

fof(f453,plain,
    spl1_37,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f174,f349]) ).

fof(f477,plain,
    spl1_17,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f192,f269]) ).

fof(f492,plain,
    spl1_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f199,f212]) ).

fof(f501,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,X1))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_18 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f274,f217]) ).

fof(f505,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_18 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f501,f230]) ).

fof(f510,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ spl1_4
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_54 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f505,f418]) ).

fof(f975,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))))
    | ~ spl1_4
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_46
    | ~ spl1_54 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f510,f386]) ).

fof(f986,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_4
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_38
    | ~ spl1_46
    | ~ spl1_54 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f975,f354]) ).

fof(f987,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_4
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_38
    | ~ spl1_46
    | ~ spl1_54 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f986]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_3
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f218]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_7
    | spl1_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f235]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_17
    | spl1_18 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f275]) ).

cnf(s19,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_37
    | spl1_38 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f355]) ).

cnf(s23,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_45
    | spl1_46 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f387]) ).

cnf(s27,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_53
    | spl1_54 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f419]) ).

cnf(s28,plain,
    ~ spl1_8,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f420]) ).

cnf(s36,plain,
    spl1_53,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f432]) ).

cnf(s42,plain,
    spl1_45,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f441]) ).

cnf(s50,plain,
    spl1_37,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f453]) ).

cnf(s66,plain,
    spl1_17,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f477]) ).

cnf(s76,plain,
    spl1_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f492]) ).

cnf(s82,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_4
    | spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_18
    | ~ spl1_38
    | ~ spl1_46
    | ~ spl1_54 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f987]) ).

cnf(s83,plain,
    spl1_54,
    inference(rat,[],[s27,s36]) ).

cnf(s87,plain,
    spl1_46,
    inference(rat,[],[s23,s42]) ).

cnf(s91,plain,
    spl1_38,
    inference(rat,[],[s19,s50]) ).

cnf(s101,plain,
    spl1_18,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s66]) ).

cnf(s106,plain,
    ~ spl1_7,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s28]) ).

cnf(s107,plain,
    ~ spl1_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s82,s83,s87,s91,s101,s106]) ).

cnf(s109,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s107,s76]) ).

fof(f988,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s109]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL544+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:58:31 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.94/1.31  % (969718)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=1992524313:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969723)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=919388468:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969725)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=3884418475:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969728)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=3173799155:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=2541384870:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969724)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=695471325:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=1604420906:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)Peak memory usage: 86 MB
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)Peak memory usage: 87 MB
% 2.94/1.31  % (969728)First to succeed.
% 2.94/1.31  % (969728)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-969718"
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969729)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969727)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969726)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)lrs+10_1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:random_seed=10982673:i=285:sd=3:ss=axioms:sgt=8_2997 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/285Mi)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)------------------------------
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)Time elapsed: 0.0000 s
% 2.94/1.31  % (969737)Peak memory usage: 87 MB
% 2.94/1.31  % (969728)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.94/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.94/1.31  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)------------------------------
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)Time elapsed: 0.019 s
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)Peak memory usage: 90 MB
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)Instructions burned: 26 (million)
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)------------------------------
% 0.18/1.50  % (969728)------------------------------
% 0.18/1.50  % (969718)Success in time 0.447 s
% 0.18/1.50  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------