↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL544+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:58:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   24
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  103 (  37 unt;  12 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  215 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  203 (  91   ~;  83   |;   2   &)
%                                         (  17 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   21 (  19 usr;  19 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   0 sgn  67   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X0)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_2) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_3) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    implies_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_2) ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    and_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_3) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',necessitation) ).

fof(f66,axiom,
    ( axiom_m4
  <=> ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,and(X0,X0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m4) ).

fof(f75,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+3.ax',km4b_necessitation) ).

fof(f86,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f89,conjecture,
    axiom_m4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m4) ).

fof(f90,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f89]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    inference(flattening,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
   => axiom_m4 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ( necessitation
   => ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( and_3
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ( implies_2
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
   => ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X0)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ( axiom_m4
    | ? [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,and(X0,X0))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ modus_ponens
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ implies_2
      | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ and_3
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f173,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ necessitation
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | axiom_m4 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_strict_implies
      | strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f143]) ).

fof(f191,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ~ axiom_m4,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f202,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( modus_ponens
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f145]) ).

fof(f206,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( implies_2
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f149]) ).

fof(f210,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( and_3
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f153]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ~ modus_ponens,
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f166]) ).

fof(f223,plain,
    ~ implies_2,
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f169]) ).

fof(f226,plain,
    ~ and_3,
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f173]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ necessitation
      | is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f181]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | axiom_m4 ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f186]) ).

fof(f251,definition,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f252,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f251]) ).

fof(f254,definition,
    ( spl1_4
  <=> op_strict_implies ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f257,plain,
    ( spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f188,f254,f251]) ).

fof(f267,definition,
    ( spl1_7
  <=> axiom_m4 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f271,definition,
    ( spl1_8
  <=> is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f273,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | ~ spl1_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f271]) ).

fof(f274,plain,
    ( spl1_7
    | spl1_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f236,f271,f267]) ).

fof(f308,definition,
    ( spl1_17
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_17])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f309,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
        | is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ spl1_17 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f308]) ).

fof(f311,definition,
    ( spl1_18
  <=> necessitation ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_18])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f314,plain,
    ( spl1_17
    | ~ spl1_18 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f231,f311,f308]) ).

fof(f388,definition,
    ( spl1_37
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1)))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_37])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f389,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,and(X0,X1))))
    | ~ spl1_37 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f388]) ).

fof(f391,definition,
    ( spl1_38
  <=> and_3 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_38])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f394,plain,
    ( spl1_37
    | spl1_38 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f210,f391,f388]) ).

fof(f420,definition,
    ( spl1_45
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_45])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f421,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1)),implies(X0,X1)))
    | ~ spl1_45 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f420]) ).

fof(f423,definition,
    ( spl1_46
  <=> implies_2 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_46])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f426,plain,
    ( spl1_45
    | spl1_46 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f206,f423,f420]) ).

fof(f452,definition,
    ( spl1_53
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
        | is_a_theorem(X0) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_53])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f453,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
        | is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ spl1_53 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f452]) ).

fof(f455,definition,
    ( spl1_54
  <=> modus_ponens ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_54])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f458,plain,
    ( spl1_53
    | spl1_54 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f202,f455,f452]) ).

fof(f459,plain,
    ~ spl1_7,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f201,f267]) ).

fof(f467,plain,
    spl1_18,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f191,f311]) ).

fof(f470,plain,
    spl1_4,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f198,f254]) ).

fof(f473,plain,
    ~ spl1_54,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f221,f455]) ).

fof(f475,plain,
    ~ spl1_46,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f223,f423]) ).

fof(f478,plain,
    ~ spl1_38,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f226,f391]) ).

fof(f488,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X0,X1))
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_17 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f309,f252]) ).

fof(f520,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X0,X1))) )
    | ~ spl1_45
    | ~ spl1_53 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f421,f453]) ).

fof(f545,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_8
    | ~ spl1_17 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f488,f273]) ).

fof(f642,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))))
    | ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_8
    | ~ spl1_17
    | ~ spl1_45
    | ~ spl1_53 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f520,f545]) ).

fof(f645,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_8
    | ~ spl1_17
    | ~ spl1_37
    | ~ spl1_45
    | ~ spl1_53 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f642,f389]) ).

fof(f646,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_8
    | ~ spl1_17
    | ~ spl1_37
    | ~ spl1_45
    | ~ spl1_53 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f645]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f257]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( spl1_7
    | spl1_8 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f274]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( spl1_17
    | ~ spl1_18 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f314]) ).

cnf(s19,plain,
    ( spl1_37
    | spl1_38 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f394]) ).

cnf(s23,plain,
    ( spl1_45
    | spl1_46 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f426]) ).

cnf(s27,plain,
    ( spl1_53
    | spl1_54 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f458]) ).

cnf(s28,plain,
    ~ spl1_7,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f459]) ).

cnf(s36,plain,
    spl1_18,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f467]) ).

cnf(s40,plain,
    spl1_4,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f470]) ).

cnf(s44,plain,
    ~ spl1_54,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f473]) ).

cnf(s46,plain,
    ~ spl1_46,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f475]) ).

cnf(s49,plain,
    ~ spl1_38,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f478]) ).

cnf(s59,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_8
    | ~ spl1_17
    | ~ spl1_37
    | ~ spl1_45
    | ~ spl1_53 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f646]) ).

cnf(s60,plain,
    spl1_53,
    inference(rat,[],[s27,s44]) ).

cnf(s64,plain,
    spl1_45,
    inference(rat,[],[s23,s46]) ).

cnf(s68,plain,
    spl1_37,
    inference(rat,[],[s19,s49]) ).

cnf(s78,plain,
    spl1_17,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s36]) ).

cnf(s83,plain,
    spl1_8,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s28]) ).

cnf(s84,plain,
    ~ spl1_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s59,s60,s64,s68,s78,s83]) ).

cnf(s86,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s40,s84]) ).

fof(f647,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s86]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL544+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:58:37 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.11/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696387)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696393)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696393)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=3667210530:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696393) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3696387-3696393"...
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696393)...printing done.
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696392)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=4140294291_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696394)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1243772615:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696395)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=4078088692:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696397)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2126029288:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696398)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=2217173054:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.11/0.44  % (3696393)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.11/0.44  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.44  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696393)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696393)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696393)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696393)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696393)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696393)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696393)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696393)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 0.11/0.45  % (3696387)Success in time 0.036 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------