↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL562+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:52:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 25.61s 8.39s
% Output   : Refutation 26.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   76
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  154 (  38 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  395 (  24 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1401 (   2   ~;   0   |;  58   &;1158   @)
%                                         (  49 <=>; 134  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   70 (  68 usr;  59 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  314 (   0   ^; 314   !;   0   ?; 314   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(equivalence_2_decl,type,
    equivalence_2: $o ).

thf(axiom_m4_decl,type,
    axiom_m4: $o ).

thf(op_or_decl,type,
    op_or: $o ).

thf(op_strict_implies_decl,type,
    op_strict_implies: $o ).

thf(axiom_m1_decl,type,
    axiom_m1: $o ).

thf(axiom_m3_decl,type,
    axiom_m3: $o ).

thf(op_strict_equiv_decl,type,
    op_strict_equiv: $o ).

thf(op_implies_and_decl,type,
    op_implies_and: $o ).

thf(op_possibly_decl,type,
    op_possibly: $o ).

thf(axiom_m5_decl,type,
    axiom_m5: $o ).

thf(axiom_m2_decl,type,
    axiom_m2: $o ).

thf(strict_implies_decl,type,
    strict_implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(necessarily_decl,type,
    necessarily: $i > $i ).

thf(implies_decl,type,
    implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(is_a_theorem_decl,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

thf(and_decl,type,
    and: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(substitution_strict_equiv_decl,type,
    substitution_strict_equiv: $o ).

thf(op_equiv_decl,type,
    op_equiv: $o ).

thf(substitution_of_equivalents_decl,type,
    substitution_of_equivalents: $o ).

thf(axiom_m10_decl,type,
    axiom_m10: $o ).

thf(possibly_decl,type,
    possibly: $i > $i ).

thf(axiom_s2_decl,type,
    axiom_s2: $o ).

thf(not_decl,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

thf(axiom_s3_decl,type,
    axiom_s3: $o ).

thf(modus_ponens_strict_implies_decl,type,
    modus_ponens_strict_implies: $o ).

thf(op_necessarily_decl,type,
    op_necessarily: $o ).

thf(adjunction_decl,type,
    adjunction: $o ).

thf(strict_equiv_decl,type,
    strict_equiv: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(or_decl,type,
    or: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(axiom_m7_decl,type,
    axiom_m7: $o ).

thf(op_and_decl,type,
    op_and: $o ).

thf(equiv_decl,type,
    equiv: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(axiom_M_decl,type,
    axiom_M: $o ).

thf(and_2_decl,type,
    and_2: $o ).

thf(axiom_K_decl,type,
    axiom_K: $o ).

thf(axiom_4_decl,type,
    axiom_4: $o ).

thf(axiom_5_decl,type,
    axiom_5: $o ).

thf(modus_tollens_decl,type,
    modus_tollens: $o ).

thf(kn2_decl,type,
    kn2: $o ).

thf(axiom_m9_decl,type,
    axiom_m9: $o ).

thf(or_3_decl,type,
    or_3: $o ).

thf(and_3_decl,type,
    and_3: $o ).

thf(axiom_m6_decl,type,
    axiom_m6: $o ).

thf(cn2_decl,type,
    cn2: $o ).

thf(necessitation_decl,type,
    necessitation: $o ).

thf(kn3_decl,type,
    kn3: $o ).

thf(axiom_s4_decl,type,
    axiom_s4: $o ).

thf(r4_decl,type,
    r4: $o ).

thf(axiom_m8_decl,type,
    axiom_m8: $o ).

thf(r2_decl,type,
    r2: $o ).

thf(kn1_decl,type,
    kn1: $o ).

thf(implies_3_decl,type,
    implies_3: $o ).

thf(axiom_B_decl,type,
    axiom_B: $o ).

thf(and_1_decl,type,
    and_1: $o ).

thf(implies_2_decl,type,
    implies_2: $o ).

thf(r1_decl,type,
    r1: $o ).

thf(r3_decl,type,
    r3: $o ).

thf(modus_ponens_decl,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

thf(op_implies_or_decl,type,
    op_implies_or: $o ).

thf(equivalence_3_decl,type,
    equivalence_3: $o ).

thf(cn3_decl,type,
    cn3: $o ).

thf(equivalence_1_decl,type,
    equivalence_1: $o ).

thf(implies_1_decl,type,
    implies_1: $o ).

thf(cn1_decl,type,
    cn1: $o ).

thf(axiom_s1_decl,type,
    axiom_s1: $o ).

thf(or_2_decl,type,
    or_2: $o ).

thf(or_1_decl,type,
    or_1: $o ).

thf(r5_decl,type,
    r5: $o ).

thf(66,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ implies ) )
        = ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_implies_or) ).

thf(282,plain,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ implies ) )
        = ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[66]) ).

thf(27,axiom,
    ( op_necessarily
   => ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ necessarily )
        = ( A @ not @ possibly @ not ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_necessarily) ).

thf(127,plain,
    ( op_necessarily
   => ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ necessarily )
        = ( A @ not @ possibly @ not ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(32,axiom,
    ( axiom_m3
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ and ) @ ( A @ and ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m3) ).

thf(138,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ and ) @ ( A @ and ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m3 )
    & ( axiom_m3
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ and ) @ ( A @ and ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).

thf(88,plain,
    axiom_m2,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(23,axiom,
    ( axiom_s3
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ not @ ( B @ possibly @ not @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_s3) ).

thf(115,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ not @ ( B @ possibly @ not @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_s3 )
    & ( axiom_s3
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ not @ ( B @ possibly @ not @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(52,axiom,
    ( r4
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r4) ).

thf(217,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => r4 )
    & ( r4
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[52]) ).

thf(65,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
          & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
       => ( B @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

thf(276,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
            & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
         => ( B @ is_a_theorem ) )
     => modus_ponens )
    & ( modus_ponens
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
            & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
         => ( B @ is_a_theorem ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[65]) ).

thf(25,axiom,
    ( axiom_m4
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ and ) @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m4) ).

thf(120,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ and ) @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m4 )
    & ( axiom_m4
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ and ) @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(59,axiom,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_1) ).

thf(247,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => and_1 )
    & ( and_1
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[59]) ).

thf(33,axiom,
    ( axiom_m7
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m7) ).

thf(142,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m7 )
    & ( axiom_m7
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(36,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ and ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_equiv) ).

thf(153,plain,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ and ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

thf(71,axiom,
    ( cn1
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn1) ).

thf(301,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => cn1 )
    & ( cn1
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[71]) ).

thf(75,axiom,
    ( or_1
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',or_1) ).

thf(320,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => or_1 )
    & ( or_1
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

thf(44,axiom,
    ( axiom_m9
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m9) ).

thf(184,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m9 )
    & ( axiom_m9
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[44]) ).

thf(47,axiom,
    ( axiom_m6
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m6) ).

thf(196,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m6 )
    & ( axiom_m6
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[47]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ( axiom_m5
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m5) ).

thf(93,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m5 )
    & ( axiom_m5
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(68,axiom,
    ( cn3
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ not @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn3) ).

thf(289,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ not @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => cn3 )
    & ( cn3
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ not @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[68]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    equivalence_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_equivalence_2) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_2,
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(78,plain,
    ~ equivalence_2,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(39,axiom,
    ( axiom_K
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_K) ).

thf(164,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_K )
    & ( axiom_K
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    op_strict_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_equiv) ).

thf(84,plain,
    op_strict_equiv,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(53,axiom,
    ( axiom_m8
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m8) ).

thf(221,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m8 )
    & ( axiom_m8
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

thf(69,axiom,
    ( equivalence_1
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equivalence_1) ).

thf(293,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => equivalence_1 )
    & ( equivalence_1
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[69]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

thf(89,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(56,axiom,
    ( implies_3
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_3) ).

thf(233,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => implies_3 )
    & ( implies_3
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[56]) ).

thf(64,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens_strict_implies
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
          & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
       => ( B @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens_strict_implies) ).

thf(270,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
            & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
         => ( B @ is_a_theorem ) )
     => modus_ponens_strict_implies )
    & ( modus_ponens_strict_implies
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
            & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
         => ( B @ is_a_theorem ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[64]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

thf(85,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(38,axiom,
    ( and_2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_2) ).

thf(160,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => and_2 )
    & ( and_2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(70,axiom,
    ( implies_1
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_1) ).

thf(297,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => implies_1 )
    & ( implies_1
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[70]) ).

thf(46,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_3) ).

thf(192,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => and_3 )
    & ( and_3
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[46]) ).

thf(31,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_equiv) ).

thf(137,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(55,axiom,
    ( kn1
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ and ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kn1) ).

thf(229,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ and ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => kn1 )
    & ( kn1
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ and ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[55]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    substitution_strict_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv) ).

thf(97,plain,
    substitution_strict_equiv,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(76,axiom,
    ( r5
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r5) ).

thf(324,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => r5 )
    & ( r5
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[76]) ).

thf(67,axiom,
    ( equivalence_3
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equivalence_3) ).

thf(285,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => equivalence_3 )
    & ( equivalence_3
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[67]) ).

thf(37,axiom,
    ( axiom_M
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_M) ).

thf(156,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_M )
    & ( axiom_M
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(45,axiom,
    ( or_3
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',or_3) ).

thf(188,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => or_3 )
    & ( or_3
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ implies ) @ ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

thf(77,axiom,
    ( equivalence_2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equivalence_2) ).

thf(328,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => equivalence_2 )
    & ( equivalence_2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[77]) ).

thf(26,axiom,
    ( op_possibly
   => ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ possibly )
        = ( A @ not @ necessarily @ not ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_possibly) ).

thf(124,plain,
    ( op_possibly
   => ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ possibly )
        = ( A @ not @ necessarily @ not ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(54,axiom,
    ( r2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r2) ).

thf(225,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => r2 )
    & ( r2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[54]) ).

thf(30,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) )
        = ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ and ) @ not ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_or) ).

thf(134,plain,
    ( op_or
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) )
        = ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ and ) @ not ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(57,axiom,
    ( axiom_B
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_B) ).

thf(237,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_B )
    & ( axiom_B
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[57]) ).

thf(63,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r3) ).

thf(266,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => r3 )
    & ( r3
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[63]) ).

thf(43,axiom,
    ( kn2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kn2) ).

thf(180,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => kn2 )
    & ( kn2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[43]) ).

thf(35,axiom,
    ( axiom_m2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m2) ).

thf(149,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m2 )
    & ( axiom_m2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(42,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( A @ not @ ( B @ not @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modus_tollens) ).

thf(176,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( A @ not @ ( B @ not @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => modus_tollens )
    & ( modus_tollens
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( A @ not @ ( B @ not @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[42]) ).

thf(49,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ is_a_theorem )
       => ( A @ necessarily @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',necessitation) ).

thf(204,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( A @ is_a_theorem )
         => ( A @ necessarily @ is_a_theorem ) )
     => necessitation )
    & ( necessitation
     => ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( A @ is_a_theorem )
         => ( A @ necessarily @ is_a_theorem ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[49]) ).

thf(62,axiom,
    ( substitution_of_equivalents
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ is_a_theorem )
       => ( A = B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',substitution_of_equivalents) ).

thf(259,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ is_a_theorem )
         => ( A = B ) )
     => substitution_of_equivalents )
    & ( substitution_of_equivalents
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ equiv ) @ is_a_theorem )
         => ( A = B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

thf(74,axiom,
    ( substitution_strict_equiv
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_equiv ) @ is_a_theorem )
       => ( A = B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',substitution_strict_equiv) ).

thf(313,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_equiv ) @ is_a_theorem )
         => ( A = B ) )
     => substitution_strict_equiv )
    & ( substitution_strict_equiv
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_equiv ) @ is_a_theorem )
         => ( A = B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    op_possibly,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_possibly) ).

thf(86,plain,
    op_possibly,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(41,axiom,
    ( axiom_5
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ possibly @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

thf(172,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ possibly @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_5 )
    & ( axiom_5
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ possibly @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

thf(81,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_equiv) ).

thf(98,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(51,axiom,
    ( axiom_s4
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ necessarily @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_s4) ).

thf(213,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ necessarily @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_s4 )
    & ( axiom_s4
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ necessarily @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[51]) ).

thf(60,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_2) ).

thf(251,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => implies_2 )
    & ( implies_2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

thf(21,axiom,
    ( axiom_s2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ and ) @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_s2) ).

thf(108,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ and ) @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_s2 )
    & ( axiom_s2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ possibly @ ( A @ possibly @ and ) @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(28,axiom,
    adjunction,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_adjunction) ).

thf(130,plain,
    adjunction,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(58,axiom,
    ( adjunction
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ is_a_theorem )
          & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',adjunction) ).

thf(241,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( B @ is_a_theorem )
            & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
         => ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ is_a_theorem ) )
     => adjunction )
    & ( adjunction
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( B @ is_a_theorem )
            & ( A @ is_a_theorem ) )
         => ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[58]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_or) ).

thf(80,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(61,axiom,
    ( r1
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r1) ).

thf(255,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => r1 )
    & ( r1
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

thf(50,axiom,
    ( kn3
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( A @ ( C @ and ) @ not @ ( C @ ( B @ and ) @ not @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kn3) ).

thf(209,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( A @ ( C @ and ) @ not @ ( C @ ( B @ and ) @ not @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => kn3 )
    & ( kn3
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( A @ ( C @ and ) @ not @ ( C @ ( B @ and ) @ not @ implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[50]) ).

thf(22,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ implies ) )
        = ( B @ not @ ( A @ and ) @ not ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_implies_and) ).

thf(112,plain,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ implies ) )
        = ( B @ not @ ( A @ and ) @ not ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',use_substitution_of_equivalents) ).

thf(99,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    axiom_m5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m5) ).

thf(87,plain,
    axiom_m5,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ( axiom_m10
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m10) ).

thf(104,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m10 )
    & ( axiom_m10
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ possibly @ necessarily @ ( A @ possibly @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(24,axiom,
    modus_ponens_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies) ).

thf(119,plain,
    modus_ponens_strict_implies,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    axiom_m1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m1) ).

thf(82,plain,
    axiom_m1,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(40,axiom,
    ( axiom_4
  <=> ! [A: $i] : ( A @ necessarily @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

thf(168,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( A @ necessarily @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_4 )
    & ( axiom_4
     => ! [A: $i] : ( A @ necessarily @ necessarily @ ( A @ necessarily @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(34,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ and ) )
        = ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_and) ).

thf(146,plain,
    ( op_and
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ and ) )
        = ( B @ not @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(72,axiom,
    ( axiom_s1
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ necessarily @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_s1) ).

thf(305,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ necessarily @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_s1 )
    & ( axiom_s1
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ ( C @ ( B @ implies ) @ necessarily @ ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily @ and ) @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[72]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    axiom_m4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m4) ).

thf(79,plain,
    axiom_m4,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(29,axiom,
    ( op_strict_equiv
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_equiv ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ and ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_strict_equiv) ).

thf(131,plain,
    ( op_strict_equiv
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_equiv ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ strict_implies ) @ ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) @ and ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(48,axiom,
    ( cn2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ not @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn2) ).

thf(200,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ not @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => cn2 )
    & ( cn2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ not @ implies ) @ ( A @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) )
        = ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_strict_implies) ).

thf(90,plain,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ strict_implies ) )
        = ( B @ ( A @ implies ) @ necessarily ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    axiom_m3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m3) ).

thf(83,plain,
    axiom_m3,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(73,axiom,
    ( or_2
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',or_2) ).

thf(309,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => or_2 )
    & ( or_2
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[73]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ( axiom_m1
  <=> ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ and ) @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m1) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ and ) @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem )
     => axiom_m1 )
    & ( axiom_m1
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ and ) @ ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ strict_implies ) @ is_a_theorem ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(637,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[282,127,138,88,115,217,276,120,247,142,153,301,320,184,196,93,289,78,164,84,221,293,89,233,270,85,160,297,192,137,229,97,324,285,156,188,328,124,225,134,237,266,180,149,176,204,259,313,86,172,81,98,213,251,108,130,241,80,255,209,112,99,87,104,119,82,168,146,305,79,131,200,90,83,309,100]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL562+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.40  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.40  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:44:55 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.91/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.57/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (253ms). 
% 1.57/1.25  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.52/1.65  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.52/1.66  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.79/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 76 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.79/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 75 axioms (removed 1 axioms). 
% 3.10/1.85  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 3.10/1.86  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.10/1.86  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 25.61/8.39  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 25.61/8.39  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 25.61/8.39  % Time passed: 7843ms (effective reasoning time: 7136ms)
% 25.61/8.39  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 25.61/8.39  % Axioms used in derivation (75): op_equiv, kn2, s1_0_axiom_m5, s1_0_axiom_m2, kn1, op_necessarily, op_possibly, modus_ponens_strict_implies, s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies, s1_0_op_strict_equiv, or_3, axiom_m9, axiom_s3, s1_0_axiom_m1, axiom_m3, and_1, axiom_K, adjunction, s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv, equivalence_2, axiom_m6, cn1, cn2, hilbert_op_implies_and, equivalence_3, axiom_s2, modus_tollens, s1_0_op_or, s1_0_adjunction, s1_0_op_strict_implies, op_and, axiom_m2, r5, or_1, kn3, axiom_B, and_3, s1_0_op_equiv, axiom_m5, use_substitution_of_equivalents, r4, modus_ponens, hilbert_op_or, axiom_M, axiom_m7, r1, axiom_s1, s1_0_axiom_m3, implies_3, axiom_m1, op_implies_and, op_strict_equiv, axiom_5, s1_0_op_possibly, cn3, r2, axiom_m4, equivalence_1, or_2, axiom_s4, axiom_m8, implies_1, r3, axiom_m10, and_2, substitution_of_equivalents, s1_0_axiom_m4, op_or, op_implies_or, hilbert_op_equiv, necessitation, axiom_4, op_strict_implies, substitution_strict_equiv, implies_2
% 25.61/8.39  % No. of inferences in proof: 154
% 25.61/8.39  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 7843 ms resp. 7136 ms w/o parsing
% 26.08/8.49  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 26.08/8.49  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------