↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LCL566+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:40:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 247.17s 70.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 247.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   25
%            Number of leaves      :   30
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  153 (  80 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  283 (  48 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  223 (  93   ~;  95   |;  17   &)
%                                         (  10 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   18 (  16 usr;  16 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   27 (  27 usr;  19 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  230 (  10 sgn  56   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(adjunction,axiom,
    ( adjunction
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
          & is_a_theorem(X2) )
       => is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',adjunction) ).

fof(op_strict_equiv,axiom,
    ( op_strict_equiv
   => ! [X1,X2] : strict_equiv(X1,X2) = and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_equiv) ).

fof(substitution_strict_equiv,axiom,
    ( substitution_strict_equiv
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2))
       => X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',substitution_strict_equiv) ).

fof(s1_0_adjunction,axiom,
    adjunction,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_adjunction) ).

fof(s1_0_op_strict_equiv,axiom,
    op_strict_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_op_strict_equiv) ).

fof(s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv,axiom,
    substitution_strict_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv) ).

fof(axiom_m1,axiom,
    ( axiom_m1
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),and(X2,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m1) ).

fof(axiom_m3,axiom,
    ( axiom_m3
  <=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X1,X2),X3),and(X1,and(X2,X3)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m3) ).

fof(s1_0_axiom_m1,axiom,
    axiom_m1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m1) ).

fof(s1_0_axiom_m3,axiom,
    axiom_m3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m3) ).

fof(modus_ponens_strict_implies,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens_strict_implies
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
          & is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',modus_ponens_strict_implies) ).

fof(axiom_m5,axiom,
    ( axiom_m5
  <=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X3)),strict_implies(X1,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m5) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies,axiom,
    modus_ponens_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies) ).

fof(s1_0_axiom_m5,axiom,
    axiom_m5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m5) ).

fof(op_strict_implies,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X1,X2] : strict_implies(X1,X2) = necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(axiom_m4,axiom,
    ( axiom_m4
  <=> ! [X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,and(X1,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m4) ).

fof(axiom_m2,axiom,
    ( axiom_m2
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m2) ).

fof(s1_0_op_strict_implies,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(s1_0_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_op_or) ).

fof(s1_0_axiom_m4,axiom,
    axiom_m4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m4) ).

fof(s1_0_axiom_m2,axiom,
    axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).

fof(axiom_m6,axiom,
    ( axiom_m6
  <=> ! [X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,possibly(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m6) ).

fof(s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m6,axiom,
    axiom_m6,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+5.ax',s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m6) ).

fof(op_possibly,axiom,
    ( op_possibly
   => ! [X1] : possibly(X1) = not(necessarily(not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_possibly) ).

fof(s1_0_op_possibly,axiom,
    op_possibly,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_op_possibly) ).

fof(axiom_M,axiom,
    ( axiom_M
  <=> ! [X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X1),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_M) ).

fof(km5_axiom_M,conjecture,
    axiom_M,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',km5_axiom_M) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X77,X78] :
      ( ( ~ adjunction
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X77)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X78)
        | is_a_theorem(and(X77,X78)) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(esk4_0)
        | adjunction )
      & ( is_a_theorem(esk5_0)
        | adjunction )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(esk4_0,esk5_0))
        | adjunction ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[adjunction])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X153,X154] :
      ( ~ op_strict_equiv
      | strict_equiv(X153,X154) = and(strict_implies(X153,X154),strict_implies(X154,X153)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_strict_equiv])])]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X81,X82] :
      ( ( ~ substitution_strict_equiv
        | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X81,X82))
        | X81 = X82 )
      & ( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(esk6_0,esk7_0))
        | substitution_strict_equiv )
      & ( esk6_0 != esk7_0
        | substitution_strict_equiv ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[substitution_strict_equiv])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
    | ~ adjunction
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    adjunction,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_adjunction]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( strict_equiv(X1,X2) = and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ op_strict_equiv ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    op_strict_equiv,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_strict_equiv]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ substitution_strict_equiv
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    substitution_strict_equiv,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X1)) = strict_equiv(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]) ).

fof(c_0_41,plain,
    ! [X113,X114] :
      ( ( ~ axiom_m1
        | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X113,X114),and(X114,X113))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk22_0,esk23_0),and(esk23_0,esk22_0)))
        | axiom_m1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X121,X122,X123] :
      ( ( ~ axiom_m3
        | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X121,X122),X123),and(X121,and(X122,X123)))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(esk26_0,esk27_0),esk28_0),and(esk26_0,and(esk27_0,esk28_0))))
        | axiom_m3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),and(X2,X1)))
    | ~ axiom_m1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    axiom_m1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m1]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X1,X2),X3),and(X1,and(X2,X3))))
    | ~ axiom_m3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    axiom_m3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m3]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),and(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46])]) ).

fof(c_0_51,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] :
      ( ( ~ modus_ponens_strict_implies
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X73)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X73,X74))
        | is_a_theorem(X74) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(esk2_0)
        | modus_ponens_strict_implies )
      & ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk2_0,esk3_0))
        | modus_ponens_strict_implies )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(esk3_0)
        | modus_ponens_strict_implies ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens_strict_implies])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_52,plain,
    ! [X129,X130,X131] :
      ( ( ~ axiom_m5
        | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X129,X130),strict_implies(X130,X131)),strict_implies(X129,X131))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(esk30_0,esk31_0),strict_implies(esk31_0,esk32_0)),strict_implies(esk30_0,esk32_0)))
        | axiom_m5 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_53,plain,
    ! [X65,X66] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X65,X66) = not(and(X65,not(X66))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X1,X2),X3),and(X1,and(X2,X3)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    and(X1,X2) = and(X2,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_50])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ modus_ponens_strict_implies
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    modus_ponens_strict_implies,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X3)),strict_implies(X1,X3)))
    | ~ axiom_m5 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    axiom_m5,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m5]) ).

fof(c_0_60,plain,
    ! [X151,X152] :
      ( ~ op_strict_implies
      | strict_implies(X151,X152) = necessarily(implies(X151,X152)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_strict_implies])])]) ).

fof(c_0_61,plain,
    ! [X61,X62] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X61,X62) = not(and(not(X61),not(X62))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(c_0_64,plain,
    ! [X127] :
      ( ( ~ axiom_m4
        | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X127,and(X127,X127))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk29_0,and(esk29_0,esk29_0)))
        | axiom_m4 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_65,plain,
    ! [X117,X118] :
      ( ( ~ axiom_m2
        | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X117,X118),X117)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk24_0,esk25_0),esk24_0))
        | axiom_m2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,and(X2,X3)),and(X2,and(X3,X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57])]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X3)),strict_implies(X1,X3))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59])]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( strict_implies(X1,X2) = necessarily(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_strict_implies]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63])]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,and(X1,X1)))
    | ~ axiom_m4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_64]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    axiom_m4,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m4]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
    | ~ axiom_m2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    axiom_m2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m2]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,and(X2,X3)),and(X2,and(X1,X3)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(and(strict_implies(X1,X3),strict_implies(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70])]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]),c_0_73])]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    not(and(not(X1),X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,and(X1,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75])]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77])]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    and(X1,and(X2,X3)) = and(X2,and(X1,X3)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_78]),c_0_78])]) ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X3,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    necessarily(or(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(not(X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    or(X1,X2) = or(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_82]),c_0_81]),c_0_81]) ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    and(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_83]),c_0_84])]) ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(X1,and(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(and(and(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    and(and(X1,X2),X3) = and(X1,and(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_85]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,and(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_84]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    strict_implies(not(X1),X2) = strict_implies(not(X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]),c_0_87]) ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = or(X1,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_89]),c_0_81]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(X1,and(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,plain,
    and(X1,and(X2,X3)) = and(X3,and(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_55]),c_0_91]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X1),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(and(X2,X3)),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_89]) ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    strict_implies(not(X1),not(X2)) = strict_implies(or(X2,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(X1,and(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(and(X3,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(strict_implies(X1,X1),strict_equiv(X1,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(strict_equiv(X1,X2),strict_implies(X1,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X1),not(and(X1,X2)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_98]),c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(not(X1)),or(X1,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_99]),c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(X1,strict_equiv(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X3,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_40]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    strict_equiv(X1,X1) = strict_implies(X1,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_101]),c_0_102])]) ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(or(X1,X1),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_94]),c_0_82]) ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(or(X1,X1)),not(not(not(X1))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_94]),c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(and(strict_implies(X1,not(X3)),strict_implies(not(X2),X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(and(X1,strict_implies(X2,X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]),c_0_106]),c_0_98])]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,or(X3,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_107]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(not(not(not(X1)))),or(X1,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,not(not(X2)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]) ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(not(not(not(X1)))),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112]) ).

fof(c_0_115,plain,
    ! [X135] :
      ( ( ~ axiom_m6
        | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X135,possibly(X135))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk33_0,possibly(esk33_0)))
        | axiom_m6 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m6])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,or(X2,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(not(not(not(X1)))),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_81]) ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,possibly(X1)))
    | ~ axiom_m6 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_115]) ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    axiom_m6,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m6]) ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X1),not(not(not(X1))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_117]),c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,possibly(X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_119])]) ).

fof(c_0_122,plain,
    ! [X149] :
      ( ~ op_possibly
      | possibly(X149) = not(necessarily(not(X149))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_possibly])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    not(not(not(X1))) = not(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_120]),c_0_93]),c_0_98])]) ).

cnf(c_0_124,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X1),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(not(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_125,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,possibly(X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_121]) ).

cnf(c_0_126,plain,
    ( possibly(X1) = not(necessarily(not(X1)))
    | ~ op_possibly ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_122]) ).

cnf(c_0_127,plain,
    op_possibly,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_possibly]) ).

cnf(c_0_128,plain,
    ( X1 = not(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X1),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,not(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_129,plain,
    implies(X1,not(not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_123]),c_0_82]) ).

cnf(c_0_130,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X1),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(not(possibly(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_125]) ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    not(necessarily(not(X1))) = possibly(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_126,c_0_127])]) ).

cnf(c_0_132,plain,
    ( not(not(X1)) = X1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,not(not(X1)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_128,c_0_98]) ).

cnf(c_0_133,plain,
    strict_implies(X1,not(not(X2))) = strict_implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_129]),c_0_80]) ).

cnf(c_0_134,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X2),X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(not(possibly(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_130,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_135,plain,
    possibly(and(X1,not(X2))) = not(strict_implies(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_131,c_0_72]),c_0_80]) ).

cnf(c_0_136,plain,
    necessarily(not(not(X1))) = strict_implies(not(X1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_137,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_132,c_0_133]),c_0_98])]) ).

fof(c_0_138,plain,
    ! [X89] :
      ( ( ~ axiom_M
        | is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X89),X89)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(esk10_0),esk10_0))
        | axiom_M ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_M])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_139,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_M,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[km5_axiom_M])]) ).

cnf(c_0_140,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(not(X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(not(possibly(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_134,c_0_98]) ).

cnf(c_0_141,plain,
    possibly(and(not(X1),X2)) = not(strict_implies(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_135,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_142,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,not(X2)),not(strict_implies(X1,X2)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_121,c_0_135]) ).

cnf(c_0_143,plain,
    strict_implies(not(X1),X1) = necessarily(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_136,c_0_137]) ).

cnf(c_0_144,plain,
    ( axiom_M
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(esk10_0),esk10_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_138]) ).

cnf(c_0_145,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_M,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_139]) ).

cnf(c_0_146,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(not(not(strict_implies(X1,X2)))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_140,c_0_141]),c_0_82]) ).

cnf(c_0_147,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X1),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X2),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_89]) ).

cnf(c_0_148,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(X1),not(necessarily(X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_142,c_0_143]),c_0_89]) ).

cnf(c_0_149,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(esk10_0),esk10_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_144,c_0_145]) ).

cnf(c_0_150,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_146,c_0_137]) ).

cnf(c_0_151,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies(necessarily(X1),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_147,c_0_148]),c_0_137]) ).

cnf(c_0_152,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_149,c_0_150]),c_0_151])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL566+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 22:44:23 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 247.17/70.51  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 247.17/70.51  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 247.17/70.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 247.17/70.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 247.47/70.87  % Total time : 58.208s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------