%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : LCL576+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Jan 17 19:33:08 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 24.61s % Output : FiniteModel 24.61s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL576+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 14:04:03 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : % 24.61/9.70 Nitpicking formula... % 24.61/9.70 Timestamp: 14:04:11 % 24.61/9.70 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 24.61/9.70 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 24.61/9.70 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 24.61/9.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 24.61/9.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 24.61/9.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 24.61/9.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 24.61/9.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 24.61/9.70 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 24.61/9.70 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2: % 24.61/9.70 % 24.61/9.70 Constants: % 24.61/9.70 bnd_adjunction = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_and = % 24.61/9.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.61/9.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2), % 24.61/9.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_4 = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_5 = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_B = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_K = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_M = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m1 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m10 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m2 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m3 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m4 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m5 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m6 = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m7 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m8 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_m9 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_s1 = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_s2 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_s3 = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_axiom_s4 = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_equiv = % 24.61/9.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.61/9.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2), % 24.61/9.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_implies = % 24.61/9.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.61/9.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1), % 24.61/9.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_is_a_theorem = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_modus_ponens_strict_implies = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_necessarily = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_necessitation = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_not = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_and = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_equiv = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_implies = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_implies_and = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_implies_or = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_necessarily = False % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_or = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_possibly = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_strict_equiv = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_op_strict_implies = True % 24.61/9.70 bnd_or = % 24.61/9.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.61/9.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2), % 24.61/9.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_possibly = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_strict_equiv = % 24.61/9.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.61/9.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2), % 24.61/9.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1)) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_strict_implies = % 24.61/9.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.61/9.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2), % 24.61/9.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1)) % 24.61/9.70 bnd_substitution_strict_equiv = True % 24.61/9.70 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 24.61/9.70 Total time: 916 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------