↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL579^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:14:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.06s 2.12s
% Output   : Refutation 3.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (  12 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  16   ~;   5   |;   2   &;  34   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   3 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0   ^;  19   !;   0   ?;  22   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ! [C: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( C @ A )
                 => ( C @ B ) )
             => ! [C: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( C @ B )
                 => ( C @ A ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ! [B: $i > $o] :
                ( ( B @ sk1 )
               => ( B @ A ) )
           => ! [B: $i > $o] :
                ( ( B @ A )
               => ( B @ sk1 ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ~ ( ( A @ sk2 )
           => ( A @ sk1 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ! [C: $i > $o] :
          ( ( C @ A )
         => ( C @ B ) )
     => ! [C: $i > $o] :
          ( ( C @ B )
         => ( C @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ! [C: $i > $o] :
            ( ( C @ A )
           => ( C @ B ) )
       => ! [C: $i > $o] :
            ( ( C @ B )
           => ( C @ A ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ! [C: $i > $o] :
            ( ( C @ A )
           => ( C @ B ) )
       => ! [C: $i > $o] :
            ( ( C @ B )
           => ( C @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ sk1 )
        | ( A @ sk2 ) )
      & ( sk3 @ sk2 )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    sk3 @ sk2,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( sk3 @ sk1 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( ( sk3 @ sk2 )
     != ( sk3 @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[6,7]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ sk2 )
   != ( sk3 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    sk2 != sk1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ sk1 )
      | ( A @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( sk1 != sk1 )
    | ( sk1 = sk2 ) ),
    inference(replace_leibeq,[status(thm)],[5:[bind(A,$thf( (=) @ $i @ sk1 ))]]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( sk1 != sk1 )
    | ( sk2 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    sk2 = sk1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    sk1 != sk1,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[13,10]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL579^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.17/0.27  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.27  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.27  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.27  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.27  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 08:54:11 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.28  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.92/0.86  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.11/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (168ms). 
% 1.35/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.88/1.45  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.88/1.46  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.06/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.06/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.06/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.06/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.06/1.59  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.06/2.11  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.06/2.12  % Time passed: 1696ms (effective reasoning time: 1068ms)
% 3.06/2.12  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.06/2.12  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.06/2.12  % No. of inferences in proof: 15
% 3.06/2.12  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1696 ms resp. 1068 ms w/o parsing
% 3.36/2.17  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.36/2.17  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------