↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL586^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:14:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.31s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  46 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  265 (  49 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  342 (  32   ~;  19   |;  13   &; 247   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   69 (  69   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   40 (  35 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  11  !!;   9  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  116 ( 107   ^;   7   !;   2   ?; 116   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    individuals: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    prop_a: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    prop_b: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    prop_c: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    mfalse: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    mtrue: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    mimpl: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    miff: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    mall: ( individuals > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    mexists: ( individuals > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    msatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    mcountersatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    minvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    a: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    b: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    r: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_24,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_26,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_27,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_28,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_29,type,
    db3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_30,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_31,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_32,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_33,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
          ~ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mnot) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
    = mor ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mor) ).

thf(f6,axiom,
    ( mimpl
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mimpl) ).

thf(f8,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
         => ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
    = mbox ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mbox) ).

thf(f9,axiom,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
        ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          & ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mdia) ).

thf(f12,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mvalid) ).

thf(f16,conjecture,
    mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mnot @ ( mdia @ r @ a ) ) @ ( mbox @ r @ ( mimpl @ a @ b ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(f17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mnot @ ( mdia @ r @ a ) ) @ ( mbox @ r @ ( mimpl @ a @ b ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
          ~ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
          ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
         => ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
    = mbox ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
             => ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
        ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          & ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
              & ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
    = mor ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ~ ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mnot @ ( mdia @ r @ a ) ) @ ( mbox @ r @ ( mimpl @ a @ b ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mnot @ ( mdia @ r @ a ) ) @ ( mbox @ r @ ( mimpl @ a @ b ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( mimpl
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mnot @ ( mdia @ r @ a ) ) @ ( mbox @ r @ ( mimpl @ a @ b ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( mimpl
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
              & ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
          ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mnot @ ( mdia @ r @ a ) ) @ ( mbox @ r @ ( mimpl @ a @ b ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
             => ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( mimpl
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
          ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
              ( ( Y3 @ Y4 )
              | ( Y2 @ Y4 ) )
          @ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
                ~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
            @ Y0 )
          @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f47,f48,f55]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
      @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
            ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
                ( ( Y3 @ Y4 )
                | ( Y2 @ Y4 ) )
            @ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
                  ~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
              @ Y0 )
            @ Y1 )
        @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
              ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 )
          @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
                ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                    ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
                    & ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) )
            @ r
            @ a ) )
        @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
                 => ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) )
          @ r
          @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
                ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
                    ( ( Y3 @ Y4 )
                    | ( Y2 @ Y4 ) )
                @ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
                      ~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                  @ Y0 )
                @ Y1 )
            @ a
            @ b ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f59,f49,f65,f55,f51,f61,f65]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( r @ Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( ( b @ Y1 )
                  | ~ ( a @ Y1 ) ) ) )
          | ~ ~ ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( a @ Y1 )
                    & ( r @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f67]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( r @ Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( ( b @ Y1 )
                  | ~ ( a @ Y1 ) ) ) )
          | ~ ~ ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( a @ Y1 )
                    & ( r @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK0 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f68]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( r @ sK0 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( b @ Y0 )
              | ~ ( a @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ~ ~ ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( a @ Y0 )
                & ( r @ sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f69]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ~ ~ ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( a @ Y0 )
                & ( r @ sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( r @ sK0 @ Y0 )
         => ( ( b @ Y0 )
            | ~ ( a @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( r @ sK0 @ Y0 )
         => ( ( b @ Y0 )
            | ~ ( a @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f72]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ( r @ sK0 @ sK1 )
     => ( ( b @ sK1 )
        | ~ ( a @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f73]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ( ( ( b @ sK1 )
      | ~ ( a @ sK1 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( r @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ~ ( a @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f75]) ).

thf(f79,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( a @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f77]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ~ ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( a @ Y0 )
              & ( r @ sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f71]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ?? @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( a @ Y0 )
          & ( r @ sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f80]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( a @ Y0 )
            & ( r @ sK0 @ Y0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $false ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f81]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( a @ X1 )
        & ( r @ sK0 @ X1 ) )
      = $false ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f82]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( r @ sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( a @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f83]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( a @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f84,f76]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( a @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f86]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f79,f87]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f90]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL586^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:00:30 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731539)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731548)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=264391724:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=574500229:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731544)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3071394802:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2368526977:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3731539-3731545"...
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731544) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3731539-3731544"...
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731546)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731544)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.31  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731545)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.21/0.31  % (3731539)Success in time 0.053 s
% 0.21/0.31  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------